POSITIVE LAW
ONLY A "POSITIVE,"
... "Enacted,"
and
"Codified" Code IS LAW!
SO HERE IS WHERE
YOU CAN FIND THE TRUTH!
HERE is a "REBUTTAL" or Legal Argument
to any and ALL NON-POSITIVE Codes
being
"LAW."
AND IF.... there are RE-QUOTES
from our
"homepage" that is a REAL GOOD thing,
that some, if not most of us need to
STUDY them again, anyway.
HERE WE GO. . .
[COPIED "IN
PART," Under "Fair Use" Educational,
and PASTED from:
https://www.govinfo.gov/help/uscode]
The United States
Code, is the codification by subject matter
of the general and permanent laws
of the
It is divided by
broad subjects into 53 titles
and published by the
Office of the Law Revision
Counsel
of the U.S. House of Representatives. . . .
[end of copied PARTS.]
[more copied PARTS. .
. ]
". . . .Of the 54 titles,
the following titles have been
enacted into
positive (statutory) law :
1, 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 17, 18, 23,
28, 31,
32, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41,
44, 46,49, 51, and 54.
When a title of the
Code was enacted into positive law,
the text of the title became legal evidence
of the law.
Titles that have not been enacted into positive law
are only prima
facie evidence of the law. . .
[end of the "in part" copied and
pasted educational QUOTE.]
[QUOTING again are . . .]
NON - ENACTED, NOR
CODIFIED and NOT "POSITIVE LAW,"
Titles are 2, 6, 7, 8,
12, 15, 16, 19, 20, 21, 22, 24,
25, 26, 27, 29, 30, 34, 42, 43,
45, 47, 48, 50, 53
WHICH MEANS the Numbers
Just above these two LINES. . .
THEY ARE NOT
"LAW" that Pertain to
"we the people," and only
have "subject matter,"
and "PERSONAL
Jurisdiction," over Federal employees,
nd SUB-Contactors
such as but not limited to,
States "contracting" under any of these "NON-Positive,"
(VIA consented agreement,) or Cities, Counties, Townships,
or any
other "corporate / Contacted entity,
BESIDES "we the
people."
SO IF YOU CAN SEE,
and
understand WHAT YOU SEE...
Title 42 U.S.C. (along with 47, and 50) have NOT been .
. .
1. "ENACTED" NOR . . .
2. NOR
"CODIFIED" NOR . . .
3. Made "POSITIVE
LAW." NOR . . .
OR
RE-VIEWED of the last
COPIED "Educational" INFORMATION Again. . .
1. "the
following titles have been enacted
into positive (statutory) law"
Yes it said . . . ."positive (statutory) law"
Meaning that the OTHERS . . .
Titles are 2, 6, 7, 8,
12, 15, 16, 19, 20, 21, 22, 24,25, 26,
27, 29, 30, 34, 42, 43,
45, 47, 48, 50, 53
ARE NOT . . . "positive (statutory) law"
[AND. . .
Still QUOTING from .gov site above. . . .]
2. "When a
title of the Code was enacted into positive law,
the text of the title became
legal evidence of the law."
if you have one... Peek around your "bar card"
and explain those words to a JURY, "for the RECORD!"
3. "Titles
that have not been enacted into positive law
are only prima facie evidence of
the law. . ."
Clear JUST-us can explain, just by
REPEATING that sentence.
[I case ANY of YOU was taught some other errounious Definition. . .
"prima facie evidence of
the law. . .
"prima facie . . ."
means. . .
COPIED "IN
PART," Under "Fair Use"
Educational, and PASTED from:
https://thelawdictionary.org/prima-facie/
A prima facie case,
then,
is one which is established by sufficient evidence,
and can be overthrown
only by "rebutting"
evidence adduced on the other side.
AND THIS IS IN FACT THE
"REBUTTING,"
or REBUTTAL"
FACTS that PROVE that above NON-POSITIVE ACTS,
Titles are 2, 6, 7, 8,
12, 15, 16, 19, 20, 21, 22, 24,
25, 26, 27, 29, 30, 34, 42, 43,
45, 47, 48, 50, 53,
are NOT "LAW-FULL LAW STAUTES."
And ALL THESE Codes, that are NOT POSITIVE LAW,
are the "Color
of Law" and ONLY look like a law to anyone
who can NOT UNDERSTAND
"Written Words," in ENGLISH,
or any other language.
AND. . .Under "Fair
Use" Positive LAW,
Title 17 U.S.C Sec, 102 and 105 (see the NUMBERS above.)
used as Educational,
and Comment under
1ST. Amendment of the "BILL OF RIGHTS,
(which is NOT the
"NON
Positive, Code of WRONGS,"
and were Copied and PASTED from:
https://thelawdictionary.org/codification/
Definition of CODIFICATION: The process of collecting
and arranging the laws of
a country or state
into a code, t. e., into a complete system of positive law,
scientifically ordered,
The Law Dictionary Featuring
Black's Law Dictionary
Free Online
Legal Dictionary 2nd Ed.
[AND Quoting....]
A collection or compendium of laws.
A complete
system of positive law,
scientifically arranged,
and promulgated by legislative
authority.
Johnson v. Harrison, 47
28 Am. St Rep.
Railroad Co. v.
State, 104
42
I It A. 518; Railroad Co. v. Weiner, 49
[COPIED "IN PART," Under "Fair Use" Educational,
and
PASTED from:
Codification
(law) From "Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia!"
This article is about the tradition of publishing
the laws of a state or
society
as official documents or books.
For other uses, see Codification
(disambiguation).
In law, codification is the process of collecting
and restating the law of
a jurisdiction in certain areas,
usually by subject, forming a legal code, i.e.
a codex (book) of law."
Codification is one of the defining features of civil law
jurisdictions.[contradictory] In common law systems,
such as that of English
law, codification
is the process of converting
and consolidating judge-made law
into statute law.
[end of quoted, as in
copied and pasted.]
[COPIED "IN PART," Under "Fair Use" Educational, and
PASTED from:
positive_law_codification PDF Just Below LINK. . .
https://uscode.house.gov/codification/positive_law_codification.pdf
Office of the Law Revision Counsel
Positive law titles
The United States Code is divided into subject matter titles.
Some are
"positive law" titles
and some are "non-positive law"
titles.
The difference is this:
A positive law title of the United States Code is
- itself - a Federal
statute
A non-positive law title of the United States Code
is an editorial
compilation of
Federal statutes.
[End of Quote.]
1. SO ONLY "Positive LAW" ARE
"FEDERAL STATUTES,"
which means. . .
2. NON-Positive CODES are
NOT
"FEDERAL STATUTES,
unless someone be
"dummer than a mud fense!"
(that was not a question.)
Title 42 U.S.C. AND Title
42 C.F.R
Tiltle 47 U.S.C. And Title 47 C.F.R (F.C.C)
have NOT been "CODIFIED,"
(among others ie. , 50 etc., etc. and OTHERS ABOVE,)
Legally meaning that THEY ARE ALL NOT "POSITIVE LAW,"
and it is JUST .
. .
"an editorial compilation of [the] Federal statutes,"
but NOT A "FEDERAL STATUTE,"
having ANY LawFull "FORCE or Effect,"
against
ANY OF "we the people."
But does have
legal EFFECT, and jurisdiction over . . .
"Federal
employees, and their immediate families,
any and ALL "State
of," employees,
whom are "Sub-contracting "SERVICES"
and "grants"
FROM the Federal Government.
(and
I use that word very loosely,) as they ALL are
UNDER
the "SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND, CONTACT."
Known as "United States Constitution"
And the "Bill of RIGHTS."
NOW. . .
WHO IS the OLRC?
Office of the Law Revision
Counsel
of the United States House of Representatives.
https://uscode.house.gov/browse.xhtml;jsessionid=
CA4FD516E9DC82D586448F075683381B
. . .
Quoting . . .
POSITIVE LAW CODIFICATION
Positive law codification by the
Office of the Law Revision Counsel
is the
process of preparing and enacting
a codification bill to restate existing law
as a positive law
title of the United States Code.
The restatement conforms to
the policy,
intent, and purpose of Congress in the original enactments,
but the
organizational structure of the law is improved,
obsolete provisions are eliminated,
ambiguous provisions are clarified,
inconsistent provisions are resolved,
and
technical errors are corrected.
[And COPIED "IN PART," Under "Fair Use"
Educational, and
PASTED from:
https://uscode.house.gov/codification
/legislation.shtml
[Did you see the
.gov?]
So. . . .
any NON-Codified Act of Congress, is
NOT the 1. "intent, Nor "original enactments,"
NOR 2. "organizational structure of the law is improved,
NOR 3. "obsolete provisions are eliminated,"
NOR 4. "ambiguous provisions are clarified,"
NOR 5. "inconsistent provisions are resolved,"
NOR 6. "and
technical errors are corrected."
Quoting same URL above . . .
Positive Law Titles vs. Non-Positive Law Titles
The Code is divided into titles according
to subject matter. Some are
called positive law titles
and the rest are called non-positive law titles.
A positive law title of the Code is itself a Federal statute.
A non-positive
law title of the Code is an
editorial compilation of Federal statutes.
For
example, Title 10, Armed Forces, is a positive law title
because the title
itself has been enacted by Congress.
For the enacting provision of Title 10,
see first section of the Act of August 10, 1956,
ch. 1041 (70A Stat. 1).
By
contrast, Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare,
is a non-positive law title.
Title 42 is comprised of many individually
enacted Federal statutes––
such as
the Public Health Service Act
and the Social Security Act––
that have been
editorially compiled
and organized into the title,
but the title itself has not
been enacted.
YES
OVER, and OVER AGAIN. . .
"A positive law title of the Code
is
itself a Federal statute."
WHICH conversely means that a
NON-Positive Code is
NOT "a Federal statute!"
[COPIED "IN PART," Under "Fair Use"
Educational, and
PASTED from:
https://uscode.house.gov/
codification/legislation.shtml
The distinction is legally significant.
Non-positive law titles are prima
facie
evidence of the law,
but positive law titles constitute
legal evidence
of the law in
all Federal and State courts.
AGAIN....
THIS IS A REBUTTAL
"Without needing to go to the "Statutes at Large,"
NOR DOES ANYONE ELSE need to go to the
Code of Federal Registar,
NOR do we the people
need to go to the
Code of Federal Regulations (referring to Title 42 C.F.R.)
SINCE IT was NEVER "CODIFIED"
or has not have become "Positive LAW," NEITHER!
JUST BY USING COMMON SENSE,
and OTHER .gov SITES,
which STATE FACTS that .
. .
A NON-Positive CODE IS NOT A
"LAW"
in
any "sense" of the word "LAW!" and that,
any "NON POSITIVE Code,
is NOT A
"Positive LAW"
it must be... NEGATIVE
law,
or in Reality NOT A LAW.
PROOF of a "NON STATUTE!"
Quoted, in PART,
"Fair Use, Educational,
copied and pasted from:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Family_court#cite_note-2
In the
under the heading of
Trial Courts of Limited Jurisdiction.
These types of courts
deal only with
a specific type of case
and they are usually presided over by
a
single judge without a jury.
[2] "Federal
Court Basics". uscourts.gov.
2013. Retrieved
YES that said....
"In the
under the heading of Trial Courts. . ."
So with that FACT they
are SUPPOSED to be
"TRIAL Courts," /
since they are UNDER that
"HEADING." = "TRIAL Courts,"
THAN it states. . .
"they are usually
presided over by a single judge
without a jury?"
HUH? When the word,
"presided" means. . .
preside: verb act as
chairman, act as president,
administrate, assume command,
be at the head of, be
in authority, be in charge,
be in the chair, be the chairran, chair,
command,
control, direct, exercise supervision,
govern, guide, have authority over,
have
control, head, hold a position of authority,
hold authority, hold sway, hold
the chair,
keep order, lead, manage, occupy the chair,
overlook, oversee,
pilot, praesidere, regulate,
reign, rule, steer, superintend, supervise,
sway,
take care of, take charge,
take over, wield authority
Associated concepts:
preside over a hearing,
preside over court, presiding justice, presiding officer.
When a "judge,' is ONLY A REFEREE, and nothing else,
NOT to
be bias,
or prejudice in any way, shape or form,
and is there to make sure that
the
"court" HAS A "JURY TRIAL," and that
all "parties to any action"
get
full and complete "DUE PROCESS,"
during the "TRIAL BY JURY!"
IF they were, or should be.... under the
"Heading of Dog
Catcher Courts,"
they would be having "
Logic has it . . . IF
they are UNDER
"Heading" of "TRIAL COURTS"
than they
should be
TRIAL "ONLY" COURTS.
SAVVY?
FACT: Since they are NOT Established by any
"POSITIVE
LAW,"
NOR "Codified," LAW....
NOR "Enacted"
by the
and
"tweaked" by they are
NOT
IN FACT "COURTS,"
of "LAW"
FACT:
NO LAW,
Now that is
"LIMITED Jurisdiction!
AND SINCE they are quoted . .
.
"courts of Limited Jurisdiction."
THEY ARE ALL VERY . . .
"LIMITED" as in REAL NO
"JURISDICTION,"
as they have NO
"POSITIVE LAW,' . . .
NOR "Codified LAW, . . .
NOR "ENACTED"
by the CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES.
NOW THAT IS TOTALLY "LIMITED"
"jurisdiction," to state the LEAST!
NOW, Since the "NON
State Licensed,"
but rather, Private Association of the "bar
carded,"
most have been wrongly taught, that the
"BILL OF
RIGHTS" does not cover a "State Court,"
as in "7th.
Amendment "TRIAL BY JURY".....
so "some of
them" can fantasize themselves
as being "judges" in their own
NON-LAW-FUL quasi-courts.
So some of the "They" can make
MILLION$ in their illegal
profession, via their own
"ILLEGAL
FALLACY."
That "LIE" seems to be the pre-VEILING
fallacy by some of the
"banisters,"
or the NON-"State" Licenced "bar card
gang."
(NO offence intended, just a "Common Defense. ]
SO Let's prove that to be
another
"law-school-bar carded" FALLACY," as in a LIE!
WE could go PAST that ole "LAW of the
LAND,"
which not only INCLUDES,
the "BILL OF RIGHTS," but also the
7TH. Amendment, within
the "Bill of RIGHTS,"
within the "Constitutional CONTRACT,"
which "GUARANTEES"
a "Trial by
Jury"
for ANY AMOUNT ($$) "in controversy,"
ABOVE $20 (USD), which has NEVER BEEN CHANGED,
NOR "REPEALED," by Anyone, at Anytime, Anywhere."
AND... LET the REST OF
US,
as in EACH AND EVERYONE OF US. . .
GO TO OUR OWN
STATES CONSTITUTION,
and STUDY... AND....
for this FIND another
Legal EXAMPLE of a
"TRIAL BY JURY" we will LOOK in the. . .
"
NOTE: since this ENTIRE
SITE is a DIY
(Do It Yourself,) assistance site,
so be my guest, and "YOU" can go
and LOOK UP YOUR
OWN STATE!
[Copied in Part ,
Under "Positive Law"
Title 17 Sec. 105 and Pasted from:
https://tlc.texas.gov/docs/legref/TxConst.pdf
Sec. 15. RIGHT OF TRIAL BY JURY.
The right of trial by jury shall remain
inviolate.
The
Legislature shall pass such laws
as may be needed to regulate the same,
and to
maintain its purity and efficiency. . . "
(Amended Aug. 24,
1935.)
[QUOTED ... in PART,
"Positive Law"
Title 17 Sec. 102. . . from. . .
https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/inviolate]
inviolate: adjective complete,
consecrated,
free from desecration, free from impairment,
hallowed,
intact, integer, inviolatus, pure, sacred,
sanctified, secure, sound, spotless,
stainless,
unaffected by injury, unaltered, unblemished,
unbroken, uncorrupted,
undestroyed, undisturbed,
unharmed, unhurt, unimpaired, uninjured, unpolluted,
unprofaned, unscathed, unspotted,
unstained, untouched, whole
IN Simple TERMS...
NOT TO BE CEASED: STOPPED, or
IMPAIRED,
meaning NO "court, (equals NONE,)
NO judge, NO Law
enforcement agent,
NO LAW, NOR ANYONE, OR THING CAN PUT
"TRIAL BY
JURY" ASIDE,
AND the "State of
"maintain its
purity and efficiency. . . "
of the "UNSTOPPABLE LAW"
of a "TRIAL BY
JURY!" SAVVY YET! YES BUBBA. . .
"Trial by JURY" IS THE LAW!"
So that MEANS....
NOT any "No Trial". . . "traffic court,"
NOR any No Trial, . . ."justice of the
peace,"
NOR any No Trial . . . "municipal,"
NOR any No Trial, . . . "juvenal" thingy,
NOR any UNLAWFUL No Trial "family" thing,
All ARE NOT REAL "C-o-u-r-t-s!",
NOR any county, district, appeals, state
supreme
or superior court,
NOR any FEDERAL,
NOR any FED. Appeals,
NOR any
so-called "Bankruptcy,"
NOR EVERYONE ELSE
below the United Supreme
COURT,
(that kind of COVERED ANY AND ALL THE REST
not mentioned herein!) can
"DENY" anyone a "TRIAL BY JURY."
And a SIDE FACTUAL
Fact:
the "PEOPLE" of the "State of
also have this
LAW,
that YOU may want,
or need to ADD to YOUR state of, also!
[QUOTING. . . verbatim ]
Sec. 29. BILL OF
RIGHTS EXCEPTED FROM
POWERS OF GOVERNMENT AND INVIOLATE.
To guard against
transgressions of the high powers
herein delegated, we declare that
everything
in this "Bill of Rights" is excepted out
of the general
powers of government,
and shall forever remain inviolate,
and all laws contrary
thereto,
or to the following provisions,
shall be void.
QUOTING AGAIN, in case,
anyone is STILL
Trying to see thru a "bar card,"
while the REST OF US
SEE the ""GUARANTEE""
which states. . . .
". . . this "Bill of Rights" is excepted out
of the
general powers of government,
and shall forever remain inviolate,
and all laws
contrary thereto,
or to the following provisions,
shall be void."
(WOW!)
SO allow me to be one
of the FIRST to STATE Here . . .
"that
ALL NON-Positive "ACTS"
are 'VOID" HERE in the State of
AND since the so-called "family,"
so-called
"courts" (pretend to be courts,
without a "JURY TRIAL") ,.... then any and ALL
"ORDERS," and any and all
"Judgments,"
and any and ALL (ALL) "VERDICTS ARE "VOID," (V-O-I-D)
WITHOUT A "TRIAL BY JURY," because
NO "LAW" can contrary thereto,
and
SHALL BE VOID."
which INCLUDES, any pretended LAW.
Including any Codes, any Statutes,
any City,
or any County "Ordnances," equals . . .
JUDICIAL NOTICE:
YOU_ALL_ARE_VOID of any JURISDICTION
without a "TRIAL BY
JURY."
___________________________________
BACK to HOME PAGE HERE!