NOT PRACTICING LAW
.INFO (or .US)
READ the "DISCLAIMER": at END of this Page. BEFORE you Proceed. HERE.
WE ARE NOT "PRACTICING"
LAW BECAUSE WE KNOW AND LIVE, THE
"LAW OF COMMON LOGIC, AND OR COMMON SENSE."
And WE DO NOT NEED
TO "PRACTICE," NOR WILL
WE NEED TO ASK FOR A LIE-Sense
to DEFEND OUR RIGHTS AS "FREE LIVING BEINGS."
And WE are NOT some
"CORPORATE FICTION(S)," NOR "Agent(s)," Employee(s),
"Sub-Contractor(s), for any "City, County, State, NOR any
Federal "Charted" COMPANY QUASI- Court(s), IMPERSONATING
AND Masquerading (Mask-a-Raiding,) as any "JUDICIAL Tribunal /
NOR ARE WE TO BE "CONTRACTED" (placed
under ANY "NON" FULLY DISCLOSED (a-greed) upon a FULL 4
"OUR FULL CONSENT!"
PREAMBLE : We the People of the United States, in
Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic
Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and
secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and
establish this Constitution HERE
We the People - establish Justice
We the People - insure domestic Tranquility
We the People - provide for the common defence
We the People - promote the general Welfare,
We the People - secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our
We the People - do ordain and establish this Constitution
ARE any of you VIEWING this site, so debased, as to see that
there is NO MENTION of any wordage stating that anyone other than "We the People," including any
words like "City, or County, or State or Federal DO ALL OF THE ABOVE?
REALLY? ONLY in a mal-functional mind would see the words... "We the People -
do ordain and establish this Constitution, and than turned 180
Degrees and GIVE THAT AWAY to "artificial factions!" That was a statement,
more than a question! "WE" wouldn't give OUR "RIGHTS" away
to any agency, or pretended court in any location anywhere, WITHOUT OUR, ON THE
NOR ARE WE BOUND BY ANY MAN
MADE LAWS (READ > *HERE * ) ""WITHOUT OUR CONSENT!"" Since "we the
people" are the ones whom set up THE "Government," than "we
the people" have to "CONSENT" to be "governed," or "judged," including to, but not limited to, summons
into ANY "pretended" court, agency, or department, or any OTHER
hidden "VOLUNTARY" action.
** BUT... **
IF WE BREAK the LAW OF
"COMMON SENSE / LOGIC" BY TRESPASSING, or ENCROACHING, or HINDERING
ANY OTHER LIVING BEINGS, IN THE ENJOYMENT OF THEIR "RIGHTS," WE NEED
TO COME TO AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN the Assumed 'INJURED PARTY,'
""WITHOUT"" THE NEED OF ANY CORPORATE / COMPANY /
CHARTERED, "court(s)," IMPERSONATING an "ARTICLE 3 TRIAL BY
WHO ARE ACTUALLY "INTERFERING" THRU THEIR PRETENDED "ADJUDICATION,"
and OR any need of any "Arbitration," AS PRETENDING TO BE
"JUDICIAL OFFICERS / JUDGES." (the really sad thing is some of these
actual and factual FEDERAL CRIMINALS "ignorantly" believe that they
are "real judges," which is a "DELUSION OF GRANDEUR," to state
the very least, of what they really, and TRULY are > ................
explicatives here ................"
GOLDEN RULE SHOULD RULE:
THESE "IMPOSTERS" . . . "summons," or demand you to
"appear" in their UN-REAL, NON JUDICIAL, UN-Constitutional, ANTI-7th
Amendment, NON TRIAL Action(s) (civil, when their "dispute" is
above $20 USD,) and YOU as a Living Being, and you are not an employee, nor
directly connected as a Sub-Contractor, of "THEIR" Corporation, and .
Amendment of the Constitution of the United States is quoted . . . HERE
In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty
dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a
jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than
according to the rules of the common law.
applies within the states, commonwealths, and territories of the United States. Gonzalez-Oyarzun
v. Caribbean City Builders, Inc., 27 F. Supp. 3d 265 - Dist. Court, D. Puerto
Rico 2014 PDF HERE
[end of quote of the FEDERAL COURT JUDGE, that is not "brain dead" as
some of the rest.]
[AND. . . QUOTING. . . ]
"The text of the
Amendment itself states as much: the right to a civil jury trial was
"preserved," not created. U.S. CONST. amend. VII; see also Baltimore
& Carolina Line v. Redman, 295 U.S. 654,
657, 55 S.Ct. 890, 79 L.Ed. 1636 (1935) ("[The] right of trial by jury
thus preserved is the right which existed under the English common law when the
Amendment was adopted."). HERE
[AND. . . QUOTING. . . ]
"Nonetheless, one of "the best examples" of
the "clauses of the Constitution which guarantee[s] and safeguard[s] the
fundamental rights and liberties of the individual [is] the Seventh
Amendment, which guarantee[s] the right of trial by jury." Continental
Ill. Nat'l Bank & Trust Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co.,
275*275 294 U.S. 648, 669, 55 S.Ct. 595, 79 L.Ed. 1110 (1935). HERE
"[T]he Bill of Rights codified venerable, widely understood
of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S.
570, 605, 128 S.Ct. 2783, 171 L.Ed.2d 637 (2008). The discussion of the
civil jury trial's importance in American history elucidates its paramount
importance. The basic right to a civil jury trial is a fundamental liberty
NOW TO GET RID OF THE LIES the FLAGRANT IGNOR-ANTS OF THE 7th.
[COPIED and PASTED, as in quoting . . . from HERE]
76 U.S. (9 Wall.) 274
provision in the Seventh Amendment of the Constitution of the United States
which declares that no fact tried by a jury shall be otherwise reexamined
in any court of the United States than according to the rules of the common law
applies to the facts tried by a jury in a cause in a state court.
2. So much
of the 5th section of the Act of Congress of March
3, 1863, entitled
"An act relating to habeas corpus and
regulating proceedings in certain cases," as provides for the removal of a
judgment in a state court, and in which the cause was tried by a jury, to
the circuit court of the United States for a retrial on the facts and law is
not in pursuance of the Constitution, and is void.
suit or prosecution, civil or criminal, has been or shall be commenced
in any state court,. . . . [end of quote.]
that say...... OH YEA..... ". . . than according to the rules of the common law applies to
the facts tried by a jury in a cause in a state court." [end
SAID AGAIN (like restating the same FACT. . . and LOOK REAL CLOSE to see
the words. . . )
suit or prosecution, civil or criminal, has been or shall be commenced in any
state court,. . . [end of quote.]
Please.....ALLOW a NON-Bar-Carder to show you the TRUTH... 1. ". . . than according
to the rules of the common law applies to the facts tried by a jury in a cause
in a state court." There is the words stating . . . . "rules of the common law applies to the
facts tried by a jury in a cause in a state court," Those WORD should
convey to any NON-Devolved being... mean... "rules of the common law applies to the
facts tried by a jury in a cause in a state court," as the location of a CIVIL
STATE COURT, and that the "TRIAL BY JURY" . . .
a "STATE COURT," that the "TRIAL BY
JURY" was "CIVIL" in that "State COURT," before it was
AND the WORD
in that above "CASE LAW" that state, look real close this
proceedings in certain cases," as provides for the removal of a judgment in a
state court, and in which the cause was tried by a jury," Now
we know that the so-called 'subject matter" was at the beginning of the
corpus," but the fact of the matter is the statements were made TWICE
that. . . ".
. . than according
to the rules of the common law applies to the facts tried by a jury in a cause
in a state court." and a "civil case" is also "at common
the "bar-carders" referring to only to "CORPORATE" law cases, in "state court
civil jury trial cases," (?) NOT having "jury trials?" That must be what the
nay-sayers are referring to, HUH? Corporate Law attempting to over take, and
"common law jury trial, civil actions." And as a great
surprise, they are partly right, EXCEPT if any party, on either side "DEMANDS A JURY
TRIAL," in any "State," OR any Federal Courts THEY SHOULD GET A
"JURY TRIAL" AS A GUARANTEE, by any and all who have taken, any, "Oath of OFFICE,
to "Defend the United States Constitution as follows . .
[Quoting, PDF HERE, as
in copied and pasted . . ]
28 U.S.C.- Judiciary and Judicial Procedure § 453. Oaths of justices and
judges. . . .
Each justice or judge of the United States shall take the following oath or
affirmation before performing the duties of his office: “I, ______________, do
solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to
persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully
and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as
_______ under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God.” [end of quote.]
SO . . .
All the "Actors" are pretending to be UNDER the NON-Enacted, NON-Codified,
NON-Positive, NON-Law, they "fraudulently extort support payments, court
court fees, etc., etc., etc., Title 42 U.S.C then the "THEY" are conversely under
the FOLLOWING. . . since you, and some of "THEY" can see the WORDS .
. . again stating . . . "Each justice or judge of the United States shall take the
following oath or affirmation before performing the duties of his office:"
and the "THEY" be under one U.S.C, then the "THEY" be UNDER
ALL THE US CODE, including the "Oath of Office," ALSO.
case you or the "THEY" missed it . . . "THE PREAMBLE OF THE United States Constitution IS IN
THE CONSTITUTION, that STATES. . .
". . .under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God.”
[end of quote.]
SEE "OATH OF
OFFICE HERE [and QUOTING, in part,
as in copy and pasted . . . ]
§16-10-1 provides: “Any public officer who willfully and intentionally violates
the terms of his oath as prescribed by law shall, upon conviction thereof, be
punished by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than five years.”
(Emphasis supplied.) [end of quote.]
LAW "CIVIL CASES" read (for the pretend-a-judges, and the
pretend-a-prosecutors, and the rest of the "RICO gang" to INSTRUCT them in
"REAL LIFE JURY TRIALS." HERE Oh, yes, you can attempt to persuade with
the LIE, but that is NOT GOING TO HAPPEN IN THIS IMITATE CASE. See the ABOVE
DISCLAIMER > HERE
1 IF . . .you can NOT RECEIVE A "JURY TRIAL," TO
DECIDE THE OUTCOME / VERDICT OF THE "DISPUTE," ACTION, THAN FACT . .
IT IS NOT A "R-E-A-L C-O-U-R-T!"
2 Is that the "THEY" are NOT
"Constitutional," in any aspect, including their violating their
sworn "OATHS OF OFFICE." to UPHOLD and Defend
the Constitution of the United States. Which makes them, not
only "voluntary LIARS," but actual terrorists, who are
"declaring war against the LAW(S) of this COUNTRY," also.
NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES . . .
can be "copied" from this site, BUT . . . any LINK, or referenced
URL, connected to the internet, has to have the URL / Web Address attached,
affixed, pointing to the LINKS provided this information, for legal educational
reference, and, to satisfy all "Copy Write and "Fair USE" LAWS.
ALL (A-L-L,) "INFERIOR
COURTS" ARE 100% "SUBJECT," and OR ARE "UNDER THE
COMPLETE CONTROL" OF THE "UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT'S"
DECISIONS, / VERDICTS, and MUST / SHALL COMPLY TO THE US SUPREME COURT
DECISIONS / VERDICTS, as their "deciding" factors, of ALL decisions,
of any "INFERIOR courts," (yes, ALL of them,) are directly UNDER CASE
"LAW" RULINGS. (LOOK UP the words "CASE LAW RULINGS,"
and than "Abide BY IT ["Abide" means "OBEY
THE FOLLOWING REASON-ABLE FACTS OF TRUTH AS
"REAL LAW" ARE AS FOLLOWS . . .
Holding v. Malley-Duff, 483 U.S. 143 (1987) HERE
Case Law "Ruling" from the United States "SUPREME"
Court . . ]
"Unlike 1983, however, we believe that it is a federal statute that offers
the closest analogy to civil RICO. The
Clayton Act, 38 Stat. 731, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 15, offers a far
closer analogy to RICO than any state law alternative. Even a
cursory comparison of the two statutes reveals that the civil action provision
of RICO was patterned after the Clayton Act. The Clayton Act provides:
person who shall be injured in his business or property by reason of anything
forbidden in the antitrust laws may sue therefor in any district court of
the United States . . . and shall recover threefold the
damages by him sustained, and the cost of suit including a reasonable
attorney's fee." [end of quote.]
enforcement provision provides:
"Any person injured in his business or
property by reason of a violation of section 1962 of this chapter may sue
therefor in any appropriate United States district court and shall recover
threefold the damages he sustains and the cost of the suit, including a
reasonable attorney's fee." [end of quote.]
RICO and the Clayton Act are designed to remedy economic injury by providing
for the recovery of treble
damages, costs, and attorney's fees. Both statutes bring
to bear the pressure of "private attorneys general" on a
serious national problem for which public prosecutorial resources are deemed
inadequate; the mechanism chosen to reach the objective in both the Clayton
Act and RICO is the carrot of treble damages. Moreover, both statutes aim to compensate the same
type of injury; each requires that a plaintiff show injury "in his
business or property by reason of" a violation." [end
[QUOTING . .
"In rejecting a
significantly different focus under RICO, therefore, we are honoring an analogy
that Congress itself accepted and relied upon, and one that promotes the
objectives of civil RICO as readily as it furthers the objects of the Clayton
Act. Both statutes share a common congressional objective of encouraging civil
litigation to supplement Government efforts to deter and penalize the respectively prohibited
practices. The object of civil RICO is thus not merely
to compensate victims but to turn them into prosecutors, "private
attorneys general," dedicated to eliminating racketeering activity.3 Id.,at 187"
(citing Malley-Duff, 483 U. S., at 151 HERE ) (civil RICO specifically has a "further
purpose [of] encouraging potential private plaintiffs diligently
to investigate"). The provision for treble damages is accordingly
justified by the expected benefit of suppressing racketeering activity, an
object pursued the sooner the better."
. . Rule 11(b)(3), allowing
pleadings based on evidence reasonably anticipated after further
investigation or discovery. See, e. g., Corleyv. Rosewood
Care Center, Inc. of Peoria,142 F.3d 1041, 1050-1051 (CA71998) (relaxing particularity requirements of Rule
9(b) where RICO plaintiff lacks access to all facts
necessary to detail claim). It is not that we mean to reject Rotella's concern
about allowing "blameless ignorance" to defeat a claim . . "Uriev. Thompson,337 U. S. 163, 170 (1949) HERE . . ."
of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.
It is so
ordered. [end of quote.]
Did you all actually "SEE" the WORDS......
"It is so ordered?" LOOKS like a
Those WORDS are
a "demand, command," which equals the word,
"ORDER." AND US SUPREME COURT DECISIONS DO "ORDER" ALL of the
"Inferior pretend-a-article-3-judical-courts" BELOW the US
SUPREME COURT, to abide, OBEY, and
AGREE be controlled TOTALLY by THEIR decisions on ALL of
the same "SUBJECT MATTER." The word
"RULING," as in "Case L-A-W" means it is to "RULE" the "LOWER /
INFERIOR courts in this country, as a "STANDARD," a GUIDE to what all
Judgments, ETC: ETC: ETC: are to actually their FINAL VERDICT IS.
That is NOT an . . . "if you feel like it, or
don't feel like following THEIR "DECISION," it is a "O-R-D-E-R" to do so,
by THE "S-U-P-R-E-M-E"
"RULING" AGENT. AND .... NOT if
your so-called "judge" of any so-called "justice of
the peace, or any municipal court, appeals court, state supreme court, or any
"FEDERAL Court, or ANY OTHER PRETENDED COURT, or whatever the
"IMPOSTERS" / IMPERSONATORS think to do or call themselves,
States S-U-P-R-E-M-E Court SAID IT, SO "JUST DO
IT IS SO "ORDERED!"
CHOICE! "JUST DO IT" and EXACTLY THAT WAY, or SUFFER AT YOUR OWN
PERIL, danger, risk, demise, "job loss," down fall ETC, and with "TRIPLE
DAMAGES," at that, and PRISON TIME!
"INFERIOR" pretended "courts" want YOU to "OBEY"
their pretended "orders." but are ILLEGAL, and if these "NON JURY
TRAIL" quasi-court do NOT need to follow their RULING COURT'S "ORDERS." That is just a
"double standard" to state the LEAST.
Remember: an UN-Constitutional "order" does NOT have to be "obeyed," as neither does any
[NOW one of my most favor- right, actual,
factual Case "LAW"
as follows . . . . ]
HERE . . . . ]
Field delivered the opinion of the court.
"An unconstitutional act is not a law; it
confers no rights; it imposes no duties; it affords no protection; it creates
no office; it is, in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never
been passed." [end of quote.] United States Supreme Court: NORTON
v. SHELBY COUNTY(1886)
NOTICE: That "VERDICT," or "case L-A-W" has never been
overruled, overturned or set aside, so it still STANDS TODAY, as
an "ORDER," to ALL so-called
LET US, and the "skimmer and
grinners," RE-View that "case LAW. . . . that pertains directly to
ALL other PRETENDED "DECISIONS,"
in ALL "LOWER" courts.
Which are "VOID," and "UNCONSTITUTIONAL" when used
"against we the people."
1. "An unconstitutional act is not a law.
. . that
really means it is "NOT a LAW!"
2. "it confers no rights;" (on
any so-called "law enforcement, nor "NON-TRIAL-courts.)
3. "it imposes no duties;" (on
"we the people." to abide by NOR "obey, NOR be "judged
4. "it affords no protection;" (Nope
"law enforcement or "NON-TRIAL-courts, have "NO IMMUNITY, ZERO, NADA, NONE!")
5. "it creates no office;" (gives
"jurisdiction" over anyone, any time, and anywhere.)
6. "it is, in legal contemplation, as
inoperative as though it had never been passed." (BINGO PLUS
those 6 Parts of a
"RULING" ("R-U-L-I-N-G").... STATES what this site is all about,
which is there exists, "NO immunity" (see NO. 4. above,) in any "ACTION
for any reason," If the perps (perpetrators) could only R-E-A-D, AND, could
understand what those WORDS STATED,, . . . . that one CASE, would STOP any
"LEO (law enforcement officer,) and or "JO" (pretended
"Judicial Officer,") or, like any "clerks of court, like ALL
prosecutors, "process servers," (refer to NOs. 2., 4., 5. and 6. just above,) and or anyone else
connected to said (NONE) "jurisdictional" ACTORS in their OWN
FAKE "NON-TRIAL quasi-court "TRAPS."
And as an Example: Title 42 U.S.C (ie. Family Courts (sick)
pretended RULES, (for PROFIT,) that is Never Been "PASSED NOR
"ENACTED," as POSITIVE LAW."
SINCE Title 42 U.S.C HAS NEVER BEEN . . .
1. "ENACTED" NOR
2. "CODIFIED" NOR
3. "PASSED as POSITIVE LAW,"
which is stated Under the "FAIR USE
LAW" for "Education Purposes" only as follows. . .
QUOTING from (in part from . . . ) uscode.house.gov/codification/term_positive_law.htm
. . .
"in general, the term "positive
law" connotes statutes, i.e., law that has been enacted by a duly authorized
SO. . . what is the OPPOSITE of a. . .
"law that has been enacted by a duly
OH YES. "a NON LAW . . .that "HAS
"been enacted," by as NON-DULY a NON-Authorized NON-Legislature, that is what that "NON-Judicial,
NON-Authority granting, F-A-K-E "LAW," when it is a
"NON-Positive," and "NON-CODIFIED" and NON-"PASSED as
a POSITIVE LAW," making it a "NON-L-A-W." [and all the
"illerate" say, yes it is!]
AND... That is a "No
Brainer" when anyone can NOT understand that "SIMPLE
FACT." NO ONLY are they legally and law-fully UN-FIT for any "Public
OFFICE" they need to be "INCARCERATED until the PAY for their CRIMES.
AND Again QUOTING more Easy to Understand
FACTS . . (fair use parts. . . )
"Positive law typically consists of enacted
law—the codes, statutes, and regulations that are applied and enforced in the
courts. The term derives from the medieval use of positum (Latin
"established"), so that the phrase positive law literally means law
established by human authority." Black's Law Dictionary
1200 (8th ed. 2004) HERE
So what does the WORDS mean
stated above that stated. . . "Positive law typically consists of
enacted law—the codes, statutes, and regulations that are applied and enforced
in the courts." [end of quote.]
OH.... that means.... that... ONLY. . . "Positive law - are "enacted"
as codes, statutes, and or "regulations (RULES), are the ONLY LAWS . .
. "that are applied
and enforced in the courts."
The REST DO NOT APPLY, AGAINST US, or
AFFORDS ANY "AUTHORITY"
to be used AGAINST US, and only THEM.
[QUOTING . .
. in part. HERE ]
"Positive laws (Latin: ius positum) are
human-made laws that oblige or specify an action.
It also describes the establishment of
specific rights for an individual or group. Etymologically, the name derives
from the verb to posit.".
DID YOU HAPPEN TO SEE THE WORDS...."It also
describes the establishment of specific rights for an individual or
And with those words stated . . . WHAT IS THE
OPPOSITE OF A "POSITIVE LAW,"
OH YEA....A "NEGATIVE LAW" that DOES
NOT "describes the
establishment of specific rights for an individual or group."
AND IF THAT "GROUP" such as any
quasi-court are attempting to USE "NON POSITIVE" NON-LAWS against us? WOE!
THEN FOLLOWING "ACTION" COMES INTO
EFFECT . . . .
these perps, get in Title 18 U.S.C. Sec. 241 and 242 HERE, ( Sec. 241.
in part. . . ) [QUOTING . . . . ]
U.S.C Sec. 241 states. . . .
If two or
more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in
any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free
exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the
Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so
exercised the same; or
If two or
more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with
intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or
privilege so secured-
be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and
if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if
such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse
or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for
life, or both, or may be sentenced to death." [end
YES.... and the "they" do NOT have to "PLAN to commit a FELONY," all they have to do is "APPLY an
a law, (also known as the "color of law, any NON-ENACTED-NON-POSITIVE law,
also known as "prima facie" which means...."At first look as fact
presumed to be true unless it is disproved (as a law,) as in
"UNCONSTITUTIONAL, THEN the "perps" get to enjoy G-POP (General Population) in a Federal
Penitentiary., up to 10 YEARS, **PER COUNT.**")
[from HERE ]. . .
1 USC § 204. Codes and supplements as evidence of the
laws of United States and District of Columbia; citation of Codes
(a) United States Code
Provided, however that whenever titles of such Code shall have been enacted
into positive law the text thereof shall be legal evidence of the laws therein
contained, in all courts of the United States, the several states, and the
territories and insular possessions of the United States. [end
means any "NON-ENACTED"
"Code" "NON-Positive, NON-CODIFIED as a REAL LAW," that "text thereof
shall," NOT "be
legal evidence.... in all the courts of the United States."
Please NOTICE the
"words pertaining directly, to the "NON-POSITIVE
law" equals the legal
phrase . . .
for as "An Example, any
Title 42 U.S.C. "NON-POSITIVE," and "Non-Enacted,
NON-Court of the "United States [Inc.] (see here **
Funded (Fed Pay Offs,) Family Courts, which are " . . . such acts include kidnapping or
an attempt to kidnap. . ." since that CODE (Title 42,) that is actually a FAKE, "color of
law," (colored to look like a law,) pertain directly to ONLY Federal
employees, and or a Federal Sub-Contractors, and or their families, ONLY. . .
the people CONSENT" to abide by Title 42, U.S.C. under a "fully
disclosed" (explained.) 4 element, contract, is as follows....
1. the "offer"
is "fully disclosed" contract, and
that understand the entirety of the contract, as in the phrase "meeting of the
subject matter, or has to be LEGAL see NORTON v. SHELBY COUNTY(1886) No. 264 AGAIN..... (
4. and the acceptance, and if the
"contract' runs more than a YEAR, it has to be writing.
SO as the EXAMPLE above, or
Title 42 U.S.C is NOT "ENACTED" as "Positive LAW" to
be, LEGAL, or Binding, or LAWFUL to gain any "subject matter"
NOR "personal jurisdiction," over Any NON-Federal employees, their immediate
families, and or Sub-Contractors, and their immediate families, with a 4
QUOTING (in part) . . .
LAW CODIFICATION - Office of the Law Revision Counsel
Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, is a non-positive law title. Title 42
is comprised of many individually enacted Federal statutes--such as the Public
Health Service Act and the Social Security Act--that have been editorially
compiled and organized into the title, but the title itself has not been enacted. [end
Quote and PDF HERE under "Fair Use Law" (in part) . .
[QUOTING . .
. . ]
StatesCode is divided into subject matter titles. Some are "positive
law" titles and some are "non-positive law" titles. The
law title of the United States Code is - itself - a
non-positive law title of the United States Code is an editorial
compilation of Federal statutes.
title 10, United States Code, "Armed
Forces", is a positive law title because the title, per se, has been
title 42, United States Code, "The
Public Health and Welfare", is a non-positive law title. The Federal
statutes set out editorially in title 42 have been explicitly enacted, but
title 42, per se, has not.
set out in non-positive law titles of the United States Code may vary slightly
from the precise language enacted into law; cross references are adapted and
stylistic changes are made in order to facilitate the integration of Federal
statutory provisions into the United States Code. By contrast, a positive law
title of the United States Code constitutes the
precise statutory language enacted into law. [end of quote.] http://uscode.house.gov/codification/positive_law_codification.pdf
again, and again, until the perps can understand ......
[QUOTING . .
. . ]
title 42, United States Code, "The
Public Health and Welfare", is a non-positive law title. The Federal
statutes set out editorially in title 42 have been explicitly enacted, but
title 42, per se, has not." HERE [end
SO just another FACT of "specific
evidence" that the EXAMPLE Title 42 U.S.C IS NOT "A NON-POSITIVE LAW
. . . and
these "ACTORS ACT".... "under the color of law," pertaining to lawful
judges, or lawful prosecutors or lawful "clerks of a lawful court"
ARE NOT and CAN NEVER BE SUCH, in any sense of the DEFINITIONS thereof. AND
without OUR "FULL
KNOWLEDGEABLE CONSENT," it is a FEDERAL FELONY / FRAUD to pretended
"jurisdiction," and or any "legal or lawful
complicity," what-so-ever, NEVER!
BESIDES. . .
[QUOTING . .
. . ]
DOANE'S ADMINISTRATORS (Supreme Court of the United States 1795) HERE quoted as follows. . .
"Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an
abstraction, and a creature of the mind only, a government can interface only
with other artificial persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor
substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible.
The legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any law,
agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than
corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them." [end
of copied and pasted.]
QUOTING in the yellow color ....
1. "Inasmuch as
every government is an artificial person,". . . NOW. . . DID that
BRAKE THE ICING ON THE FAKE COURT CAKE? And if any
entity, or group of people, work for ANY "government" agency, City,
County or State (sub-contracted to the FEDERAL) government, they ALL are in
fact are "Artificial
persons," ALSO . . .
"government can interface onlywith
other artificial persons."
ARE YOU AN "ARTIFICIAL PERSON?" YES OR NO!
answer is. . . . "NO" . . . than the "THEY" have NO "subject matter jurisdiction," NOR ANY "PERSONAL
JURISDICTION," NOR ANY "JUDICIAL STANDING," what so flipping EVER, over ANY of
OUR, AFFAIRS, by "any of their" contrived CORPORATE NON-Positive
LAWS, Statutes, Codes, Rules or REGULATIONS, and duh "they" are NOT
even to communicate with you without YOUR PERMISSION.
THEY also lied, committed FRAUD, pretending / ACTING that YOU ARE AN "ARTIFICIAL
Some, if NOT most, bar carders, were taught NOT TO READ, the actual words in a
simple statement or question.
3. AND to be
more CONCLUSIVE .... "The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed
from creating and attaining parity with the tangible," JUDICIAL
NOTICE: WE ARE THE "TANGIBLE," and NOT duh they, who are the "ARTIFICIAL
PERTAINS TO ANY, NON JUDICIAL, NON-JURY TRIAL, UN-CONSTITUTIONAL "artificial
Examples, just to name just FEW, such as....and ALL Family (pretended) Courts,
and Municipal (pretended) Courts, Justice of the Peace (pretended) Courts, and
ANY OTHER """NON TRIAL,"""" quasi
governmental agents, and ANY AND ALL NON-COMMON LAW, "artificial
persons," or "government" agencies."
4. AND..... "The legal
manifestation of this is that NO government, as well as any law, agency,
aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than corporate,
artificial persons and the contracts between them." [end
CORPORATE, ADMINISTRATIVE, government, artificial FRAUDULENT COURT'S, agents,
can ONLY under a "legal manifestation of this is that NO government, as well
as any law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other
than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them." [end
SO .... DEMAND these "artificial" courts.....their evidence, of THE ABSOLUTE
PROOF THAT "WE the Living People," are "Artificial PERSONS?" WHERE IS YOUR PROOF?
"IF" the "ACTORS" could READ. . . (be like a "heaven
on earth," SITUATION.") But they can NOT read thru "GREED
stained bar cards."
HALE v. HENKEL 201 U.S. 43 at 89 (1906) HERE [most viewers, will, and or, should re-read
the following more than twice (2 TIMES), to re-place the
"lies" that your, [and or their teachers,] may have lied to you, [and
to them,] about . . . while you or they were "falsely"
believing that they were "studying" LAW. . . . ]
verbatim . . . ]
of the court states:
"The "individual" may stand upon "his Constitutional
Rights" as a CITIZEN. He is entitled to carry on his
"private" business in his own way." His power to contract is
unlimited." He owes no duty to the State or to his neighbors to divulge
his business, or to open his doors to an investigation, so far as it may tend
to incriminate him. He owes no duty to the State, since he receives nothing
there from, beyond the protection of his life and property. "His
rights" are such as "existed" by the Law of the Land (Common
Law) "long antecedent" to the organization of the State", and
can only be taken from him by "due process of
law", and "in accordance with the Constitution." "He
owes nothing" to the public so long as he does not trespass
upon their rights." [end of quote. And I should
not have to use words like "Emphasis added," for anyone that actually
has an IQ above their shoe size.]
THIS IS A "JUDICIAL WARNING" TO "ALL" COURT PERSONAL:
Including "judges," prosecutors,
clerks, ETC. ETC.
AND ANY AND ALL OTHER Quasi-NON-Positive Law
Departments, State, City, County, Township,
FACTS as Evidence as follows . . .
Not ONLY the "case LAW" Rules, but
ALSO the United States Codes shall be
applied within the "States" as in 28 U.S.C. § 1652 - Judiciary and Judicial
Procedure § 1652. State laws as rules of decision.
"The laws of the
several states, except where the Constitution or
treaties of the United
States or Acts of Congress
otherwise require or provide, shall be regarded as rules of decision in civil
actions in the courts of the United States, in cases where they
to * 28 U.S.C. § 3002 below.] [end of
That pertains DIRECTLY to any "court" anywhere IN THE UNITED
STATES. Unless they provide an "AFFIDAVIT Under the Pains and Penalty, and
under "Full Liability [not lie-ability,] signed by judges and clerk of
court's own hands' and quasi-court Seal affixed to their AFFIDAVIT, than
1. Silence Equals Consent by NOT responding to
"REQUEST / DEMAND for said Affidavit or 2. Also that becomes
Evidence of their CORPORATE status, and will be used in one of THEIR CORPORATE
Superior Quasi COURTS under an "Grand Jury INDICTMENT, and than with a
3. OR you are invited to the INTERNATIONAL COURT . .
. PDF Handbook HERE
officer of the United States (Federal,
and or State (any and ALL inferior courts,) is a federal felony
violation of 18 U.S.C. 912.
[QUOTING . .
. . ]
assumes or pretends to be an officer or employee acting under the authority of
the United States or any department, agency or officer thereof, and
acts as such, or in such pretended character demands or obtains any money,
paper, document, or thing of value, shall be fined under this title or
imprisoned not more than three years, or both." [end
Aiding and abetting such impersonation is a felony violation of 18 U.S.C. 3 . as an "accessory after
(before or during,) the fact."
[QUOTING. . .]
knowing that an offense against the United States has been committed, receives,
relieves, comforts or assists the offender in order to hinder or prevent his
apprehension, trial or punishment, is an accessory after the fact.
as otherwise expressly provided by any Act of Congress, an accessory after the
fact shall be imprisoned not more than one-half the maximum term of
imprisonment or . . . fined not more than one-half the maximum fine prescribed
for the punishment of the principal, or both; or if the principal
is punishable by life imprisonment or death, the accessory shall be imprisoned
not more than 15 years." [end of quote.]
18 U.S.C. 4 When anyone tell anyone else, that
a crime is being committed, and that "anyone else" is in ANY
"law enforcement, judicial, or governmental compactly," and they do
NOT DO ANYTHING TO STOP the criminals, or notify other "LEOs or JOs.
"IMMEDIATELY: they become. . . the "WHOEVER" . . . .
[QUOTING . .
. . ]
knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the
United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to
some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United
States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three
years, or both. [end of quote.]
or concealing a material fact that is within the jurisdiction of any branch
of the Federal government, and is another felony violation of 18 U.S.C. 1001. Includes "electronic" email, posting your name on the internet ETC. ETC.
[QUOTING . .
. . ]
Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the
jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the knowingly
d willfully-- , (a) falsifies, fact; Government of the United States conceals,
or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material
any representation; materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or
materially makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to
contain any false,
fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry; shall be fined under this title,
imprisoned not more than 5 years." [end of quote.]
Transmitting false and/or fraudulent court "process," subpoenas,
orders ETC., ETC., via U.S. Mail is mail fraud, another felony violation
of 18 U.S.C. 1341.
in part . . . ]
Whoever, having devised or
intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or
property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses,
representations . . . for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice or
attempting so to do, places in any post office or authorized depository for
mail matter, any matter or thing whatever to be sent or delivered by the Postal
Service, or deposits or causes to be deposited any matter or thing whatever to
be sent or delivered by any private or commercial interstate carrier. . . shall be fined under
this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both . . .
" [end of quote. that also includes, "Public Notices"
in news papers, or uploaded, and or posted into the internet, which
is covered by the words . . . "sent or delivered by any private or commercial
interstate carrier. . ."]
one of the RICO "predicate
acts" itemized at 18 U.S.C. 1961 et seq.
See also 28 U.S.C. 1691 in this context. (to
name a few of the 10 more FEDERAL CRIMINAL STATUTES that RULE any and ALL COURT
PERSONAL within the BORDERS of the United States.)
[QUOTING . .
. . ]
*** 28 U.S.C. § 3002 14 & 15A - Judiciary
and Judicial Procedure § 3002. Definitions. . .
State " means any of the several States, the District
of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, the Commonwealth of
the Northern Marianas,
or any territory or possession of the United States
(15) ' United States " means--
(A) a Federal
agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or
instrumentality of the United States. [end
[SO let us
allow LOGIC to RULE in using the "Definition" of "United
a " Federal Corporation," by injecting the meaning, into (B) and (C) as follows. . . .]
agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the "Federal
(C) an instrumentality
of the " Federal corporation."
LOGICAL LOOK WE READ. . .]
State " means . . . .[a] " possession of the United States [A Federal
"14) " State " means . . . .[a] " possession
of the Federal Corporation.
SO, . . . FACT:
There is NO REAL, DEJURE, (equals any TRUE, REAL, ACCRUAL,)
"STATE and or FEDERAL " government" / COURTS, Agencies,
of and by "We the People" of the united states
of America. That includes ALL City, County as
Sub-Contractor's of United States. AND you do not have
to believe that for it, for that to still be a FACT.
** NO ONE ONE! **
But YOU CAN FORCE THESE PERPS / Perpetrators /
"ACTORS" INTO "THEIR" so-called HIGHER COURTS,
to have "THEM" TRIED BY A JURY, as a "REMEDY," and at
"TRIPLE DAMAGE VIA A "FEDERAL CRIMINAL
AND if the OTHER "ACTORS" /
"PRETENDED" GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, COURTS, etc., etc., etc.,
DO NOT ACT UPON SAID FED COMPLAINT,
THEY "JOIN" INTO THE CONSPIRACY UNDER Title 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3 AND 4 HERE
. . . . ]
AND BY HINDERING AN INVESTIGATION Title 18 Sec.
with intent to avoid, evade, prevent, or obstruct compliance, in whole or in
part, with any civil investigative demand duly and properly made under the
Antitrust Civil Process Act, willfully withholds, misrepresents, removes
from any place, conceals, covers up, destroys, mutilates, alters,
or by other means falsifies any documentary material, answers to written
interrogatories, or oral testimony, which is the subject of such demand; or
attempts to do so or solicits another to do so; or
Whoever corruptly, or by
threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences,
obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due
and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is
being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due
and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or. . .
Shall be fined under this title, imprisoned
not more than 5 years . . ." [end of quote.]
[QUOTING . .
. . ]
Title 18 Sec 1506 Theft or alteration of
record or process; HERE
Whoever feloniously steals, takes away, alters,
falsifies, or otherwise avoids any record, writ, process, or other
proceeding, in any court of the United States, whereby
any judgment is reversed, made void, or does not take effect;
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned
not more than five years, or both. [end of quote.]
[QUOTING . . . . And
here is a GREAT AFFIRMATION for "It is so ORDERED" issued by the United States Supreme Court, as in
THEIR "IT IS SO ORDERED" challenge. ]
18 U.S.C. § 1509 - Obstruction of court orders
Whoever, by threats or force, willfully
obstructs, impedes, or interferes with, or willfully attempts to prevent,
obstruct, impede, or interfere with, the due exercise of rights or the performance
of duties under any order, judgment, or decree of a court of the United States,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
No injunctive or other civil relief against
the conduct made criminal by this section shall be denied on the ground that
such conduct is a crime.
[end of quote.Copied and pasted....]
This is an actual NOTICE that anyone
(which can include you,) who READS THIS NOTICE is being duly NOTIFIED as the "WHO-EVERS" MENTIONED ABOVE U.S.C.
which includes, but not limited to,) PO "Police Officers, LEOs (Law
Enforcement Officers, JOs (Judicial Officers,
including prosecutors, clerks etc. etc) OF THAT FACT IN A WARNING AT THE
BEGINNING OF THE COMPLAINT RIGHT AFTER THE HEADING.
FOR THE LINKS!
ANY OR ALL OF THE LINKED SITES, on this site, may (or may,) NOT
Agree, with any "subject matter," on this site. AND .....
SO With that FACT in Mind..... "NONE of the LINKED SITES
ARE LIABLE FOR ANYTHING ON THIS SITE."
AND. . . We are "NOT" RESPONSIBLE
for any "DEAD" Links!
BUT YOU can kindly, Let Us Know, and when we
we will attempt to fix, or what needs to be to
updated in any "dead" links. THANKS!
OUR Newest Youtube Vid about this site. HERE
THE SUPREME LAW LIBRARY HERE
FAMILY Guardian HERE
Bouvier's LAW DICTIONARY HERE
Law Dictionary - Free Online HERE
ALL Municipal, and all JP / Constable courts
are in "TOTAL LACK of LAWFUL Jurisdiction" to issue
"search warrants and or arrest" warrants, that
upon conviction could end in ANY "Jail Time" what so ever.
LAW-FULLY . . .
FAC: They are ALL ONLY "Class C
1. FINE ONLY, PDF HERE Quoting verbatim . . . "They also have jurisdiction in misdemeanor cases where punishment upon
conviction may be by fine only. [end of quote.]
2. NO "jail,"
3. NO "Confinement," SEE above PDF, refer to the IMAGE on Municipal Court QUOTING . .
"Criminal misdemeanors punishable by fine only (no confinement)" [end of quote,]
And to a normal minded "living being" that is NOT trying to "READ thru a "bar card," . . . the words . . .
"Criminal misdemeanors punishable by fine only (no confinement)" means NO ARREST, NO JAIL TIME, NO DETAINMENT PEROID!
and REMEMBER that means they can NOT ARREST ANYONE and must bump the case / ACTION to the county level where a
"JURY TRIAL" is available, for a "JURY TRIAL."
AT Youtube™ (until they take it
Municipal Court have NO Jurisdiction
Municipal Court have NO Jurisdiction 2 HERE
Tap the PIC BELOW.
THAT Excellent DONATION
SECURE: CONTACT US HERE
TO "HELP" PROMOTE and GROW THIS SITE
THE FOLLOWING SITES are "SUBMIT
SO "ADD YOUR SITE" from the
"CLICK ON the TEXT LINKS!"
MORE TO COME INCLUDING DOCS / PDFs
NOTICE: ON ALL EXTERNAL LINKS . . . .
"ANY "LINKED" SITES, above may
or may NOT agree with SOME, or ALL
of the "Subject Matter" contained
herein, and are only provided as EDUCATIONAL
REFERENCE MATERIAL, FOR "RESEARCH,"
and totally HERE under the "FARE USE LAW," ONLY!!
** THIS IS THE DISCLAIMER at the END of the
SO YOU DON'T WASTE "OUR" TIME. . .
WE ARE NOT LEGALLY, nor MORALLY RESPONSIBLE
FOR ANYTHING YOU DO,
AND, OR DO NOT DO,
IF YOU DO IT INCORRECTLY, OR
YOU DO IT WITH THE WRONG ATTITUDE.
[The "attitude" part is about if you
"believe" in what you are using, or not, or if it works or does not
If YOU DO NOT "REALLY" BELIEVE IN
WHAT YOU ARE USING WILL WORK,
OR EVEN .....
"IT WILL WORK," equals "The
BUT. . .
IF YOUR ATTITUDE / Belief is....
"it maybe should work,"
OR . . . "has it worked
OR "How do you know if it works
THAT IS YOUR FAULT,
and REALLY has NOTHING TO DO WITH THE
MATERIAL, NOR the Process.
BE-LIVE IT OR NOT.....
IF YOU DO NOT BELIEVE SOMETHING WILL
MORE THAN LIKELY, IT WILL NOT WORK!
SO . . . YOU SHOULD DO THE "ATTITUDE
Adjustments" BEFORE YOU
1. BEGIN any "process" filings
before you file, and
2. YOU START THROWING BLAME, on any