Not Practicing Law . Info

ImTranslation LINK for this site, OR just copy LINK / URL
of this page and than paste, in top box..
Than choose your language to be translated to, and click the
"Translate" button lower left of same box.
OR..... get the browser ...extension
YES..You can also add that extension to all the "major" browsers.

NOTICE. . .
PLEASE... go to END of this PAGE and READ the "DISCLAIMER": at END of this Page.
BEFORE you Proceed. → HERE.

PROMISE: We will REPEAT Statements many times... to REPLACE the LIES
that were TAUGHT TO US, before visiting this site!

And.....We know that this PAGE is LONG
But so is any amount of "jail time," or LOOSING Your children,
and OR Your properity, or your LIFE ... would be ....
WITHOUT A . . . . "TRIAL BY JURY!!"

SECONDLY. . . this ENTIRE site, (means all of it,)
and everything on it, is under a "Positive Law," which is.....
Title 17 U.S.C Sec. 107, criticism, comment, news reporting,teaching,
(including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship,

And is also under the "Preamble" and also the "Bill of RIGHTS,"
Along with the 1st (FIRST) Amendment = freedom of speech!
of the ORGANIC" united states Constitution,
for "Education" and Comment, News. etc., etc., etc.,"

AND, Secondly . . . .
WE ARE NOT "PRACTICING" LAW, BECAUSE WE KNOW AND LIVE,
THE "LAW OF COMMON LOGIC,"
AND OR "COMMON SENSE."
And WE DO NOT NEED TO "PRACTICE,"
NOR WILL WE NEED TO ASK FOR A LIE-Sense
to DEFEND OUR RIGHTS AS "FREE LIVING BEINGS."

And WE are NOT some
"CORPORATE FICTION(S)," NOR "Agent(s)," Employee(s),
NOR any "Sub-Contractor(s), for any
"City of, nor County of, nor State of etc., etc., etc.,. . .
NOR . . . Any Federal "CHARTERED" COMPANY
QUASI- Court(s), IMPERSONATING AND
Masquerading (Mask-a-Raiding,)
as any "JUDICIAL Tribunal / quasi-courts" WITHOUT ANY "TRIAL BY JURY!"

NOR ARE WE TO BE "CONTRACTED"
(nor placed under ANY "NON" FULLY DISCLOSED
(non-a-greed) agreed upon a
"FULL 4 (FOUR) Element CONTRACT," → HERE
WITHOUT
"OUR" or Each and Everyone's Personal FULL "On The Record CONSENT," → HERE
at a Fully Guaranteed Art. 7, 6th. etc . . . "JURY TRIAL."

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union,
establish Justice,
insure domestic Tranquility,
provide for the common defense,
promote the general Welfare,
and secure the Blessings of Liberty
to ourselves and our Posterity,
do ordain and establish this Constitution. → HERE

We the People - secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves
and our Posterity,

ARE any of you VIEWING this site,
so debased, as to see that there is **NO MENTION**
of any wordage stating that anyone other than
"We the People," which does NOT include any words like
"City of, nor County of, nor State of," and nor ANY "Federal,"
NOR "CONGRESS," NOR "PRISEDENT. . . NOR UN! etc., etc., etc.,
Are ANY of THOSE "NGOs" (Non Government ORGINIATIONS LISTED ABOVE
IN THAT "PREAMBLE" other than. .
"We the PEOPLE?
REALLY? Do ya'll See any of them others listed in that PREAMBLE?
Or was that just fictioned into your imagination?

ONLY in a mal-functional mind
would see the words...
"We the People - do ordain and establish this Constitution,"
and than turn 180 Degrees and GIVE THAT IT AWAY to
"artificial factions!" created by
"WE THE PEOPLE!"

That was a statement, more than it was a question!
"WE the People" would *NOT* give OUR "RIGHTS"
away to any agency, and or any pretended court,
in any location anywhere, or any group of paid qasi-"representatives,"
WITHOUT OUR, "ON THE RECORD, CONSENT!"
REALLY WE NEVER EVER LEGALLY or LAWFULL DID! NEVER!

NOR ARE "WE the PEOPLE" BOUND BY ANY MAN MADE LAW(S) READ → *HERE *
""WITHOUT OUR CONSENT in Writing!""

AND WITHOUT "WE the PEOPLE" RATIFING Said ACT!
SUCH AS DUH FAKE 14th. Amendment, which did NOT . . .
1. have QUORUM of our REPERSENTITIVES
2. have 3/4s of the STATES to RATIFY said FAKE amendment!

Since ONLY... "We the People" are the ones whom SET up THE
"Government," than
"We the People" have to "CONSENT" to be "Governed,"
and or "CONSENT" to be"Judged,"
including to, but not limited to, any "summons to appear" into ANY LAW-LESS
(= NOT established by a real 100% "Positive LAW," by any)
"pretended" quazi-court, or agency or department, , etc., etc., etc.
or any OTHER, (even hidden) other
"NOT-VOLUNTARY / NOT CONSENTED" action.

The Following is a very important "copied and pasted" INFO, from link below it, that
most ALL have NEVER LEARNED, including most ALLjudges, and most ALL lawyers,
and if and of the above just mentioned do LIVE it, and they deny it, to ROB "WE the PEOPLE!"

QUOTING, as in Copied and Pasted form LINKS after each QUOTE
[ Brackeded Wprds Added for equalty . . . .]

The Habeas Corpus Act of 1679 looked directly back to
clause 39 of the Magna Carta of 1215 charter, which reads:

"No free man [nor woman,] shall be arrested or imprisoned or disseised
or outlawed or exiled or in any way victimized, neither will we attack him [ or her]
or send anyone to attack him [or her,] except by the lawful judgment of his [nor her]
peers or by the law of the land."
HERE

DEFINTITION of . . . . DISSEISED pleading. This is a word with a technical meaning, which, when
inserted in an indictment for forcible entry and detainer,
has all the force of the words expelled or unlawfully,
for the last is superfluous,
and the first is implied in the word disseised."

8 T. R. 357; Cro. Jac. 32; vide 3 Yeates' R. 39; S. C. 4 Dall. Rep. 212. → HERE

SO. . .with that difinition of "disseised" placed in that above FACT IT NOW IT READS....

"No free man [nor woman,] shall NOT be "SEARCHED,” or or "arrested”
nor "imprisoned" [= disseised] .. . as in any indictment for forcible entry
and detainer such as a ARREST WARRANT," nor outlawed, nor exiled
or in any way victimized, neither will we attack him [nor her.] or send anyone to attack him
[nor her,] except by the lawful judgment of his [or her,] peer(S) or by the law of the land."

WE the PEOPLE ESTBLISH "JUSTICE," so WE THE PEOPLE BY JUDGEMENT
of OUR PEERS ONLY! (now SEE the original definition of PEERS...
the word . . . ."PEERS" means "EQUALS"

Again, in CASE... anyone just "skimmed and grinned” . . . that said in NON-lawyer speak . . .
". . . except by the lawful judgment of his (or her,) PEER(S), or by the law of the land."

The WORD. . . ."peerS” is PLURAL, meaning MORE THAN ONE to 6 (SIX,) PEERS!
and NOT by a single judge, nor a few judges. . .nor a magistrate, nor . . .
but BY AN INDICTMENT BY A JURY of "12 CITIZENS."
Which is a . . . "Grand JURY!"
AND the word "PEERS" means "EQUALS" NOT some,
nor anyone of seeming greater egos, nor TITLES such as in......
ESQ, or "your honor," nor the "Honorable," nor Your Lordship, sir judge what's IT's name!

NOR ESQUIRE (ESQ,) NOR a "bar card," NOR an "appointment to the Supreme Court,
NOR ordaind, NOR "sworn in" by whom-the-so-ever!

AND QUOTING THE LAW,
Again that Great old "COMMON Law" of this COUNRTY was Fastioned AFTER. . . .

"No freeman [or freewoman,] shall be taken, imprisoned, disseised, outlawed, banished,
or in any way destroyed, nor will We proceed against or prosecute him, [or her]
except by the lawful judgment of his [or her] peerS by the law of the land."

"To no one will We sell, and to no one will We deny or delay, right or justice."
→ HERE

IF ANY of "WE the PEOPLE" BREAK the LAWS OF "COMMON SENSE / LOGIC"
or "COMMON Decency," BY TRESPASSING, or ENCROACHING,
or HINDERING ANY OTHER LIVING BEINGS,
IN THEIR ENJOYMENT OF THEIR FULL and "EQUAL RIGHTS,"
then "We the People"
NEED TO COME TO AN AGREEMENT
BETWEEN US . . and the Assumed "INJURED PARTY(S),"
"WITHOUT"" THE NEED OF ANY CORPORATE / COMPANY / CHARTERED,
LIE-Sensed . . ."pertend-a-court(s)," IMPERSONATING ANY
REAL "4th, Amendment PDF → HERE

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers,
and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures,
shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause,
supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched.
and the persons or things to be seized."

"PROBABLE." That which has the appearance of truth; that which appears to be
founded in reason."

BOUVIER'S 1856 LAW DICTIONARY → HERE

Problbable Does NOT mean MAYBE...
as in "Guessing" which actually is only "PROFILING". . . LOOK IT UP!
But by actual FACTS
AND..
I'd SUGGEST using that Dictionary for "WORD MEANINGS"
BACK when "We the PEOPLE WROTE THE LAW!"]
OR as close to that as you can. . .Which is "Blackstones Commontaries"
And ..... Bouvier Law Dictionary 1856 and . . HERE or HERE
Blacks Law Dictionary NO later than 2nd. Ed.

And
REFER AGAIN Directly to the "MAGNA CARTA," and IT's CASE LAW Just below,
on that that Amendment!

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime,
unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury,
except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia,
when in actual service in time of War or public danger;
nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy
of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself,
nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."

INFAMOUS CRIME ... Describes a major crime like treason or a felony where
where a severe term of jail be imposed!

DID ANY OF THAT ABOVE SAY. . or STATE... or city of, or city of OR a prosecutor,
or a gaggle of "prosecutors,"
NOR a JUDGE, or more than ONE "judge," or a whole "gaggle" of judges,
nor a . . . Supreme Court etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., IT SAID . .
"unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, = J-U-R-Y!)"

Again REFER AGAIN Directly to the "MAGNA CARTA," and CASE LAW Just below,
on that that Amendments!

In all criminal prosecutions,
the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public TRIAL,
by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed,
which district shall have been previously ascertained by law,
and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation;
to be confronted with the witnesses against him;
to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor,
and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his [or her,] defence."
Again REFER AGAIN Directly to the "MAGNA CARTA," and CASE LAW Just below,
on that that Amendments!

"In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars,
the right of trial by jury shall be preserved,
and no fact tried by a jury shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States,
than according to the rules of the common law."
Again REFER AGAIN Directly to the "MAGNA CARTA," and CASE LAW Just below, on that that Amendments!

Section 1.
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States,
and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,
are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.
No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges
or immunities of citizens of the United States;
nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property,
without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

BACK again to **TRIAL BY J-U-R-Y, by A-L-L COURT(S)
And have JUST-US in a "Trial of our PEERS!"

AGAIN. . . LEGAL DEFiNITION of "PEER".
Equal. A man's or woman's peers are their EQUALS!
OR..:
"One that is of equal standing with another"
OR
as a VERB .. .
"to look narrowly or curiously"
OR:
"especially : to look searchingly at something difficult to discern" → HERE

ALL NON-Jury-Trial quazi-courts ARE ACTUALLY
"INTERFERING" THRU THEIR
PRETENDED "ADJUDICATION," = PERSONAL JUDGEMENTS
and OR, any REAL need of any REAL Legal "Arbitration,"
AS PRETENDING TO BE "JUDICIAL OFFICERS / JUDGES."
(the really sad thing is, some of these *ACTORS* are actual and factual
FEDERAL CRIMINALS which are
"Ignorantly," and TOTALLY "Arrogantly" believe
that they think they are the ONLY "real judges,"
which is the height of a "DELUSION OF GRANDEUR,"
to state the very least, of what they really,
and TRULY are . . . which is.....
> "................ thourght-full expletives here ................" <

THE GOLDEN RULE SHOULD RULE:

AND.... IF ANY of THESE "IMPOSTERS" . . . pretend to . . "issue any "summons,"
or demand you to "appear" in their "LAW-LESS," UN-REAL, NON JURY building or hut!
ARE ALL NON JUDICIAL,
Actual . . .
UN-Constitutional = NOT CONSTITUTIONAL
Against ALL OUR COMMON LAW of . . . "judged by OUR PEERS" Under their. . .
ANTI-7th Amendment, **NON JURY TRIAL** Action(s)
(Such as any "civil," ....when their "dispute" is above $20 USD,
or any and all "criminal," which would include any "jail time," crimes what so ever...
(and there are NO other types of "cases, JUST THE TWO Types,")

and IF... YOU as a Living Being / Citizen, and you are not an employee,
and or not directly connected as a Sub-Contractor,
(as "under a fully informed consented and SIGNED "4 Element" contract,")
AND Via A LEGAL AFFIDAVIT NOTARIZED by a NOTARY!
And SIGNED BY 2 WITNESSES 21 years and UP,
and IF any of those IMPERSONATING "WE the PEOPLS" COURTS
Summons ANYONE into "THEIR" Private Corporation, hearings
THAN the FOLLOWING is Pertinent to ALL
PARTIES, but NOT LIMITED to any
"ACTING".... "judicial Officer" (JO)
"judges, justices of the peace, (JP)
or prosecutors,
or clerks of any court, or any
"process servers,"
or so-called "law enforcement officers," (LEOs)
and or, ANY other NOR any judge, or any "justice of the peace" NOR ANY....
city of, county of, state of, parish of, or terratory of,
and or . . . any federal officers . . .UNDER THE 4th. 5th, or 6th., OR . . .

AGAIN.... THE 7th Amendment of the 1791 Constitution
of the United States is . . . → HERE

"In Suits at common law,
where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars,
the right of trial by jury shall be preserved,
and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined
in any Court of the United States,
than according to the rules of the common law."

SO when any CIVIL ACTION which exceeds "$20 USD than
"PRESERVED means.....
To keep from injury, peril, or harm; protect.
synonym: defend.
To keep in perfect or unaltered condition;
maintain unchanged. To keep or maintain intact."

This "RIGHT" applies WITHIN ALL the States, Cities, Counties
commonwealths, townships, parishes and also ALL territories of the

United States

.
Gonzalez-Oyarzun v. Caribbean City Builders,
Inc., 27 F. Supp. 3d 265 -
Dist. Court, D. Puerto Rico 2014 → HERE
[end of quote, Extra Emphasis Added!
Verdict by a REAL FEDERAL COURT JUDGE,
who is NOT as "brain dead" as a FEW of the rest.]

And IF anyone is having problems with the WORD.. "SUIT"
in the phrase. . . "In Suits at common law,"
we will PROVIDE A LEGAL Definition
from → HERE
[Quoting, in part ... see "Fair Use LAW...]

"Suit is a generic term, of comprehensive signification,
and applies to any proceeding in a court of justice
in which the plaintiff pursues, in such court,
the remedy which the law affords him
for the redress of an Injury or the recovery of a right.
It is, however, seldom applied to a criminal prosecution."
[end of quoted, and . . .
IF you can READ, than that means there are . . .
**ONLY** 2 (T-W-O)
Different TYPES of "cases, or actions"
EITHER
1. "CIVIL" or C-I-V-I-L... or
2. "CRIMINAL" = C-R-I-M-I-N-A-L...
and any and all of those who repeat, or try to convince you other-than-wise
that WHATEVER OTHER type of case(s),
and or actions are
NOT EITHER "CIVIL OR CRIMINAL,"
rush them to a MENTAL HOSPITAL AS SOON AS POSSIBLE... because....
they need a "frontal lobotomy reversal, Post Haste"
because they,
do NOT HAVE A CLUE what they are
"talking about" or just plain ole LAIRS, making "Stuff UP,"
And that includes to anyone with, (or without,)
a LAW DEGREE, and OR LIE-Sense.
S-T-U-D-Y . . Murdock vs Pennsalvina, 319 U.S. 105 → HERE

FACTS...
SUITS 1. applies to any proceeding in a court of justice
in which the plaintiff pursues,
(and that INCLUDES ANYONE being a PLAINTIFF,
or anyone who STARTS an "action," including "We the People," that is US, not the U.S
and nor any of them, if they be "called" judges, prosecutors, (or other any other potanta
OR "WHO THE FLIP" OTHERS, except
2. . . "however, seldom applied to a criminal prosecution."
OR....
3. . . When it is a "C-I-V-I-L MATTER!"

You might ask. . . . what is the differance of a
"court of justice,"
and a "court without justice?"

JURY Tr-i-a-l-s, = Trials by Jury of OUR **PEERS,** to
have a JUDICIAL..and... LAW-Full Verdict.

and the meaning of....
"courts without justice"
do NOT have "Jury Trials," (**NO Trials by a Jury of OUR PEERS / EQUALS**)
WHICH ARE in FACT 100% TOTALLY . . . UN-LAW-Full Verdicts.

And IF they happen to send you, or anyone that you know to JAIL,
even for "Contempt of Court,"OR "NO SHOW," or etc., etc., etc.
THEY are IN FACT .....commiting a "C-r-i-m-i-n-a-l Action,"
and then "WE the PEOPLE," CAN *DEMANED* the REQUITED
"Trial By JURY" of OUR PEERS, = a their ... Jury Trial,)
BEFORE ANY "INCARSERATION!"
Unless they have a Passport and are a "flight RISK!"

STUDY the Amendments . .
4th. 5th. 6th. and 7th, which EQUALS the MAGNA CARTA AGAIN!

QUESTION....So are you really, truthfully, without any "REMENDY,"
and or, by Confinement or any FINE = THREATEND, or Harassed?
WITHOUT A "GRAND JURY" INDITEMENT or "JURY TRIAL? .... Yes or NO?
And were you or someone you know of . . . or are you really "LAW-FULLY"
required to "appear" in their "ILLEGAL administrative"
tribunal functional buildings.... , with "NO TRIAL BY JURY,"
as in a FALSE, FAKE, pretend-a-court function,
even if you did sign any "ticket,"under Duress"
or have you received any "lawless summons, to appear in a "NON JURY TRIAL, NON COURT!"
or any FAKE "search or arrest....warrant" from any.... "NON JURY TRIAL, NON COURT!"
Are you or anyone REALLY, legally or LAWFULLY need to Appear?
THE .......
Answers to ALL ABOVE IS RE-SOUNDING . . . **NO!**

[AND. . . QUOTING. . . ]
OUT OF COURT . . .
"[THEY] who has no legal statue in court is said to be “out of court.”
[end of quote, AND That the FACTS of this SITE,
and any FAKE city of, NOR county of or state of etc., etc.,
any fake "ordenance(s),"are NOT A "STATUTE, "

So YOU CAN NOTIFY ALL PARTIES of any "action,"
that if. . .
ANYONE "has NO legal statute," "RATIFIED BY WE the PEOPLE,"
(AS.... as in 3/4 Three Quaters of all the states,") than they are ALL. . .
"OUT OF COURT,"
and NOT a "LEGAL ACTION, under any CASE of
ANY LAW. AND TOTALLY WITHOUT. . .
1. Subject Matter or
2. PERSONAL JURISDICTION, what-so-ever!
NOR any "standing," NOR any "AUTHORITY to Proceed,"
in ANY "ACTION, (or reaction,) without . . . .
OUR ON the RECORD, CONCENT!

"The text of the Amendment itself states as much:
the right to a civil jury trial was "preserved,"
not created."
U.S. CONST. amend. VII;
see also Baltimore & Carolina Line v. Redman,
295

U.S.

654, 657, 55 S.Ct. 890, 79 L.Ed. 1636 (1935) → HERE
("[The] right of trial by jury thus preserved
is the right which existed under the English
common law when the Amendment was adopted.").
(End of Quoted Case LAW → HERE

DID you happen to see the words . . .
"RIGHT of a TRIAL BY JURY... *** . . . thus preserved. . .***

"Nonetheless, one of "the best examples" of the
"clauses of OUR Constitution which guarantee[s]
and safeguard[s] the fundamental rights
and liberties of the individual [is]
the Seventh Amendment,
which guarantee[s] the right of trial by jury."
Continental Ill. Nat'l Bank & Trust Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island
& Pacific Ry. Co., 275*275 294 U.S. 648, 669, 55 S.Ct.
595, 79 L.Ed. 1110 (1935). → HERE

"[T]he Bill of Rights codified venerable, widely understood liberties."
District of Columbia v. Heller,554

U.S.

570, 605, 128 S.Ct. 2783,
171 L.Ed.2d 637 (2008). → HERE
"The discussion of the civil jury trial's importance in American history elucidates
its paramount importance.
The basic right to a civil jury trial is a fundamental liberty interest.
(end of quoted LAW Emphasis Added for FOCUS, Only!)

NOW TO GET RID OF THE LIES the FLAGRANT
IGNOR-ANTS OF THE 7th. Amendment ....
conjured up out of their fictional pretended Quasi "law" schools.

NEXT: [COPIED and PASTED, and NEVER has
been "over-ruled," nor "overturned," nor "set aside,"]
by any real "JUDICAL COURT" as in quoting . . . from → HERE

1. The provision in the Seventh Amendment
of the Constitution of the United States which declares
that no fact tried by a jury shall be otherwise
reexamined
in any court of the United States
than according to the rules
of the common law applies to the facts tried
by a jury in a cause in a state court.

"An act relating to habeas corpus and
regulating proceedings in certain cases
as provides for the removal of a judgment
in a state court,
and in which the cause was tried by a jury,
to the circuit court of the United States
for a retrial on the facts
and law is not in pursuance of the Constitution, and is void. "

"If any suit or prosecution, civil or criminal,
has been or shall be commenced in any state court,. . . ." → HERE
[end of quote.]

WHAT did that say...... OH YEA.....
". . . than according to the rules of the common law applies to the facts
*** tried by a jury ***. . . . in a cause in a state court."
[end of quote.]

AND THAT SAID AGAIN (like restating the same exact
FACTS of EVIDENCE. . . and LOOK REAL CLOSE
to see the words. . . )

"If any suit or prosecution, civil or criminal, has been or shall be commenced in
any state court,. . .
[end of quote.]

1. ". . . than according to the rules of the common law applies to the facts
tried by a jury in a cause in a state court."

Those WORDS should convey to any mentally
NON-Devolved
being as a meaning...
2. "rules of the c-o-m-m-o-n law applies to the facts tried by a jury
in a cause that STARTED.... in a state court,"
as the location of a
"CIVIL STATE COURT," and that the
"TRIAL BY JURY" . . .
"STARTED," IN a
"STATE COURT," that the
3. "TRIAL BY JURY" was "CIVIL" in that
"State COURT,"
before it was "re--examined."
BY a "CONSTITUTIONAL 7th. Amendment "TRIAL BY COURT!"

OH. . . that applies, unless it is NOT A REAL, as in a
"Positive Law Statute"
"STATE COURT OF LAW?" Right!

AND the WORD in that above "CASE LAW" (CASE L-A-W)
that stated, look real close this time .....
"regulating proceedings
in certain cases," as provides for the
removal of a judgment in a state court,
and in which the cause was tried by a jury,"

Now we know that the so-called
"subject matter"
was at the beginning of the sentence
"habeas corpus," [means produce the body,]
and that DOES NOT MEAN "DEAD BODY", but the fact of the matter is the statements
were made TWICE that. . .
". . . than according to the rules of the
common law
applies to the facts tried by a jury in a cause in a state court."
and that was, and is a "civil case," and is also "at common LAW."

OR are the "bar-carders" licenced under a Private Corporation ...referring to only to their
"PRIVATE CORPORATE"
ADMINISTRATIVE
NON-CONSTITUTIONAL = NO JURY TRIAL fake court
cases, in a NON "civil jury trial cases," (?)
NOT having "jury trials?"
OH...That must be what the nay-sayers are referring to, HUH?

SINCE in Corporate Law, there has to have a LICENCE,
since it is "CORPORATE," attempting to over take,
and CON-Troll
"common law jury trial, in civil actions."
And as a great surprise, they are partly right,
EXCEPT if ANY PARTY, on either side
"DEMANDS A JURY TRIAL, by the LAW of THIS LAND" in ANY so-called...
or any FAKE dog catcher thing,
OR any FAKE traffic court, OR any FAKE juvenile court, or any FAKE "family court," or any
FAKE "Justic of the Peace court," or FAKE Municipal court, or FAKE county court, or any FAKE "State" court.
or FAKE any Tax court, or any FAKE Small Claims court or any FAKE Bankruptsy court......
,. . . . . . .Etc., Etc., Etc.,
OR any FAKE "Federal Courts," than THEY SHOULD GET A
"JURY TRIAL" AS A GUARANTEE,
by any, and ALL (A-L-L) who have taken, any,
"Oath of OFFICE, to
"Defend / or UPHOLD"
within the United States of America
and within the United States Constitution
as follows . .

[Quoting, as in copied and pasted . . . SEE
"OATH OF OFFICE" → HERE ]
28 U.S.C. Sec 453- Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
Oaths of justices and judges. . . .
Each justice or judge of the United States shall take the
following oath or affirmation before performing the
duties of his office:
“I, ____________________, do solemnly swear
(or affirm) that
I will administer justice without
respect to persons,
and do equal right to the poor
and to the rich,
and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge
and perform all the duties incumbent
upon me as _________________
under the Constitution and laws of the United States.
So help me God.”

[end of quote. and ALL, or anyone who is an "officer"
of ANY Judicial hearing or, and or "Judicial" Procedure, or Action
IS REQUIRED to, under THAT
"POSITIVE LAW STATUTE,"
to give their "SWORN OATH" to ALL THEM THERE WORDS,
also be "BONDED," (as in "INSURED,")
And
these Pretend-a-courts, are NOT R-E-A-L "Judges"
of any
"JUDICIAL PROCEDURE,"
EVERYWHERE IN THIS COUNTRY!,
and for that matter,
in any where in the ENTIRE WESTERN HEMISPHER that the Brits setteled, such as...
The Magna Carta as their "COMMON LAW,"

BUT.... IF they VIOLATE their Sworn OATH OF OFFICE
SO . . . which is in FACT also "PERJURY" is in... LYING UNDER OATH,
THEY OFFICIALY HAVE REMOVED THEMSELVES form the bench,
besides they HAVE commited many other FELONIES, under the "color of LAW,"
such as.... Title 18 U.S.C Sec. 241 and 242 etc. etc. etc.

AND COMMITED "JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT!" which includes the
"Supreme Court of the UNITED STATES!"

WARNING TO ALL the "Actors," DBA...
or whoever, that are pretending to be licenced under...
UNDER the
NON-Enacted, NON-Codified, NON-Positive,
NON-RATIFIED NON-LAW, that they are "fraudulently"
charging FINES, and False Jail Time,
AND extorting support payments, and court fees, and lairs fees, etc., etc., etc.,"
which they are based on. . .
Title 42; OR Title 21 ; OR Title 47 U.S.C.,
then YOU / "THEY"
are conversely under the FOLLOWING. . .
since you, and some of "THEY"
can see the WORDS . . .
again stating . . .
"Each justice, or judge of the United States shall take the following oath or affirmation
before performing the duties of his office:"
and if the "THEY" be under any
NON "POSITIVE LAW," Acts of the
U.S.C, then the
"THEY ALL" are UNDER ALL THE US CODES,
including their BREAKING THEIR "Oath of Office," ALSO.

THAT SAID. . .
"Each justice or judge of the United States" and was their action started / filed
WITHIN THE UNITED STATES"
Yes or NO?

(Answer is "YES" it was!)
than WE WILL HAVE A "TRIAL BY JURY,"
or NO LAW-FULL ACTION is to continue.

AND, in case you, or the "THEY" missed it, . . .
"THE PREAMBLE OF THE

United States

Constitution . . .
**IS IN**
THE CONSTITUTION,
Along WITH the . . .
"BILL OF RIGHTS,"
are WITH-IN
the Constitution of the united states,"
and YOU ALL are also INSIDE THAT CONTRACT, that STATES. . .
". . .under the Constitution and laws of the UNITED STATES

So help me God.”
[end of quote.]

1. Maybe their "god," or God, or GOD, just is not "helping" them, in the least part? Huh! ....

And OR. . .
2. They are just "mouthing" the words, and did NOT REALLY mean ANY OF Those WORDS they "SWORE TO!"

And OR . . .
3. or they DO NOT "understand" the English words, THEY SPOKE,
and than SIGNED,
in front of EYE WITTINES(S)! such as. . .

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will . . . .
faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me
as _________________ under the Constitution and laws of the United States"
[END OF WHAT WAS "SWORN" AS AN "OATH". . .
UNDER THE CONSTITUTION and LAWS,"
of the United States,"
[not the NON LAWS made up for profit only,]

And IF they DO NOT FILL_FULLY that PUBLIC "OATH," was ALSO A.... "SIGNED CONTRACT"

1. "GO TO PRISON" for "LYING UNDER AN "OATH,"
That is Prejury!
Also Equals PRE-JURY! (and therei I stated the TRUTH again....to replace the LIES they
TAUGHT you, and everyone else, IN THIS COUNTY and ON THIS LAND!

2. "MUST....PAY BACK to ANY and ALL their VICTIMS OF "THEIR PERSONAL FRAUD,"
in TRIPPLE DAMAGES,

and ALSO . . .
3. There is a Lack of "Specified PERFORMANCE,"
of All ITEMS of said "SIGNED CONTRACT" and at LEAST 30 (THIRTY,) OTHER FEDERAL FELONIES that
"We the People," can ADD to "THEIR" Personal FEDERAL CRIMINAL Complaints,
and after them, than CIVIL Complaints AND ALL IN A TRIAL BY JURY...FEDERAL COURT!
via "Rotella vs Wood 528 US 549 → HERE

AGAIN... that was NOT a "threat," that is a Promise,
via the protection of a "Positive LAW,"
found at
Title 18 Sec. 1512 → HERE

Example: ". . . OCGA §16-10-1 provides:
“Any public officer who willfully and intentionally violates
the terms of his oath as prescribed by law shall,
upon conviction thereof, be punished by imprisonment
for not less than one nor more than five years.”
(Emphasis supplied.)

UNLESS they commited Title 18 U.S.C Sec. 3 and 4 CRIMES
[end of quote. and "ANY" means "ALL" of them there
"public officers," get "IMPRISONMENT," → HERE
and I'd vote for ....
a Without PAROLE for the whole
"FIVE (5) YEARS!!" PLUS "RICO ACT of Orginized Crimes!

And THE LAW to have a
"TRIAL BY JURY"
is IN, as INSIDE, ALL the State's Constitution,
and the US Constitution,
so NO ONE has a "free form dumb pass"
on that fact, either. Making an "OATH"
to do something, with hand or on a bible, means
no more than to them, PERPS,
than lying about most everything else,
that their "dirty little" hand(s) touch,
or their LYING mouths state,
FROM their "OATH" onward.

COMMON LAW "CIVIL CASES" read
(for the "pretend-a-judges,"
and the "pretend-a-prosecutors,")
and all the REST or the "pretended
law enforcement officers,
are "OPERATING OUTSIDE ANY REAL LAW,"
which makes them ALL...
a "RICO Gang of ORGINIZED CRIME!"
And instead of wasting time, and money trying to INSTRUCT them in
"REAL LIFE JURY TRIALS." PDF → HERE

Then You USE.... Title 18 U.S.C 241 and 242
Duh THEY Shall be CHARGED by FEDERAL CRIMINAL CHARGES.

Not a patty cake, patty cake "civil suit" cake... BUT... ONLY...a "Criminal Action FIRST"

Hey WARNING to all you pretend-dah-judges...
Oh, yes, you can attempt to persuade "others" with that LIE,
but that is NOT GOING TO HAPPEN IN THIS IMMEDIATE CASE ACTION!

FACT: 1
IF . . .you Did NOT or can NOT RECEIVE A "JURY TRIAL," TO DECIDE THE OUTCOME
/ VERDICT OF THE "DISPUTE," IN ANY ACTION,
THAN FACT . . . .
"IT IS NOT A "R-E-A-L C-O-U-R-T!"
REALLY, it is NOT a "REAL COURT,"
it is a
"FALSE,
FAKE,"
Pretend-a-judicial something,
(that I can't state here!)

FACT: 2
And the "PRETENDERS" are NOT
"Constitutional,"
NOR "LAWFUL,"
NOR "LEGAL," in any aspect,
including their violating their sworn
"OATHS OF OFFICE. to UPHOLD and Defend
the Constitution of the

United States

."
Which makes them, NOT only
"voluntary LIARS commiting Prejury"
but actual CRIMINAL terrorists, who are
"declaring war against the LAW(S) of this COUNTRY," which is "TREASON!"

Hey "actors," Would you LIKE to bet your LIFE(S),
that WE can not CONVINCE a Hale vs Henkel 201 US 43, 44 (1906) ... "GRAND Jury"
of that FACTS HERE
HUH?

SO OPPS....
"IT" may Look LIKE a court, as it has a sign saying it's a court,
and
"IT" may even SMELL something like a court,
but OOOOOOOOH . . .
I'm sure happy I did NOT to STEP IN IT!"

It is LIKE you "pretenders" should drop any and ALL "Illegal," Unlawfull action(s),
and wipe OUR files Sparkling CLEAN, as in a FREE "Expungment,"
([email protected]@k that WORD... up in a "L-A-W Dictionary,)
and "WE the People," might DROP the Federal, and State CRIMINAL
CHARGES, and there exists NO other options.

Anything can be "copied" from this site,
BUT . . . "any QUOTE," or referenced URL,
connected to the internet, has to have the
URL / Web Address attached, affixed,
pointing to the LINKS provided this information,
for legal educational reference, and,
to satisfy all "Copy Write and "Fair USE"
Positive LAWS, in "OUR country."
Find them in "Positive LAW"
Title 17 U.S.C → HERE
Sec. 107 (among others.)

FACT 3:
ALL (A-L-L,) "INFERIOR COURTS"
ARE 100%"SUBJECT," and OR ARE
1. "UNDER THE COMPLETE CONTROL "FIRST" . . . to the "ORGANIC" Constitution of the united States
And 2. By the "LAW-FILLED UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT'S"
DECISIONS, / VERDICTS, and MUST / SHALL COMPLY
TO MOST ALL US SUPREME COURT DECISIONS
/ VERDICTS, Unless they also violated the st thur 10th AMENDMENTS...
as their, the "LOWER COURTS,"rulings or "their"
deciding" factors, of ALL decisions,
of any "INFERIOR courts,"
(yes, ALL of them, ARE "INFIERIOR,") and are directly
UNDER
C-A-S-E "L-A-W" RULINGS.
(LOOK UP the words "CASE LAW RULINGS,"
and than
"Abide BY THEM ["Abide" means "OBEY THEM."]

"Unlike 1983, however, we believe that it is
a federal statute that offers the closest analogy to civil RICO."
The Clayton Act, 38 Stat. 731,
as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 15, offers a far closer analogy to RICO than any state law alternative.
Even a cursory comparison of the two statutes reveals
that
the civil action provision of RICO was patterned after the Clayton Act.

The Clayton Act provides:
"Any person who shall be injured in his business or property
by reason of anything forbidden in the antitrust laws
may sue therefor in any district court of the United States . . .
and shall recover threefold the damages
by him sustained,
and the cost of suit including a reasonable attorney's fee."
[end of quote.]

IF anyone can rely on finding an a-torn-knee that is REASONABLE!
That would be like fining PURE GOLD, in a goose egg, Good Luck with that!

"Any person injured in his business
or property by reason of a violation of section
1962 of this chapter may sue therefor in any
appropriate United States district court
and shall recover threefold the damages
he sustains and the cost of the suit, including a
reasonable attorney's fee."
[end of quote.]

Did you SEE the words....
"May sue therefor in any appropriate United States District Court"
NO IMMUNITY THERE "bar-carders!"

"Both RICO and the Clayton Act are designed to
remedy economic injury by providing for the
recovery of treble damages, costs, and attorney's fees.
Both statutes bring to bear the pressure of
"private attorneys general"
on a serious national problem for which
public prosecutorial resources are deemed inadequate;
the mechanism chosen to reach the objective in both
the Clayton Act and RICO is the carrot
of treble damages.
Moreover, both statutes aim to compensate
the same type of injury;
each requires that a plaintiff
show injury "in his business or property
by reason of" a violation."

LET US LOOK at the words. . . "private attorneys general"
WHICH..... MEANS . . . . they do **NOT have a BAR CARD!**
Different than some of our "PEERS" = EQUALES

"In rejecting a significantly different focus under RICO,
therefore, we are honoring an
analogy that Congress itself accepted and relied upon, and one that promotes the objectives of civil RICO
as readily as it furthers the objects of the Clayton Act.
Both statutes share a common congressional objective of encouraging
civil litigation to supplement Government efforts to deter and penalize the respectively
prohibited practices.
The object of civil RICO is thus
not merely
to compensate victims
but to turn them into prosecutors,
"private attorneys general,"
dedicated to
eliminating racketeering activity.
3 Id.,at 187"
(citing Malley-Duff, 483 U. S., at 151 → HERE )

(civil RICO specifically has a "further purpose [of]
encouraging potential private plaintiffs
diligently to investigate").
The provision for treble damages
is accordingly justified by the expected benefit of
suppressing racketeering activity,
an object pursued the sooner the better."

". . . Rule 11(b)(3), allowing pleadings
based on evidence reasonably anticipated
after further investigation
or discovery.
See, e. g., Corleyv. Rosewood Care Center, Inc.
of Peoria,142 F.3d 1041, 1050-1051 (CA71998)
(relaxing particularity requirements of Rule 9(b)
where RICO plaintiff lacks access to all facts
necessary to detail claim).
It is not that we mean to reject Rotella's
concern about allowing
"blameless ignorance to defeat a claim . . "
Uriev. Thompson,337 U. S. 163, 170 (1949) → HERE . . ."

"The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed."
It is so ordered.
[end of quote.]

LOOKS IS A ....
"C-O-U-R-T O-R-D-E-R,"
to anyone with their IQ above their SHOE SIZE,
which they also should know a Legal term called
"Stare Decisis"
meaning
"All judges are bound to follow precedent of earlier decisions."

IF THE DECISIONS ARE 100% PERAMBLE and 100% Bill of Right, and
100% the REALLY **RATIFIED** FIRST 13 Amendments
of **ORIGINAL ORGANIC** Constitution!

And the word "PRECEDENT" means as a
Stated "RULE," a "to be followed,"
and "abide by the VERDICTS."
and NOT make up "your own" "get rich" quicker "ponzy schemes" with "pretend-a-verdicts,"
in YOUR UN-LAW-FOOL pretend-a- judicial
FRUDULENT, FAKE, FARCE NON-TRIAL by JURY Anti-courts!

HEY you SO-Called..... delusional "judges"
do "WE the PEOPLE... need to provide you also with the DEFINITION of the word
"BOUND,"
OK... HERE. . . That means
1. to adhere to.
2. to abide by.

Those are your only 2. choices,
or would you RATHER choose the experience
of being "bound" as in
"incarceration" as OUR Only Other Choice No. 3. ??

Those WORDS are a "a demand, or a command,"
which equals the word,
"ORDER."
OF THE...
US
SUPREME
COURT
DECISIONS THAT AGREE 100% WITH the US Constitution.

IF THEY AGREE 100% WITH the Constitution, LAW OF THIS LAND!
AND....The "BILL of RIGHTS!" AND. . . ALSO the "Magna Carta"
SO it is.... "ORDERED" to ALL of the
"Inferior . . . .
pretend-a-article-4-judical-quasi-courts"
WHO are ALL B-E-L-O-W the
Centered and RULED BY. . . LAW OF THIS LAND
When the, your "Supervisors" dba... the US SUPREME COURT,
to faith-fully
abides,
OBEYS,
and AGREES TOTSLLY be controlled
TOTALLY only by THEIR "Constitutional" decisions
on ALL of the same
"SUBJECT MATTER."

The word "RULING," as in "Case L-A-W"
means it is to
"RULE" = R-U-L-E,) the "LOWER / INFERIOR courts
in this WHOLE country, on the 1. LAND, and in the 3. AIR above it,
and 11 Miles.... OUT . . . into International Waters.... and or,
any where "the Magna Cater was enacted, and or installed,
as a "STANDARD," and or, as a
GUIDE to what all courts, or as a LAW or
"VERDICT," or Judgdments, or Decisions,
and is a DIRECT "Order!,
ETC: ETC: ETC:
are to actually RULE ABIDE BY the
THEIR FINAL VERDICT Which EQUALS
the "Verdicts" by the
S-U-P-R-E-M-E COURT VIA the LAW of THIS LAND!

AND ...
ALL You who pretend to be "judges" and that includes anyone who calls themselves judges...
BELOW the United States Supreme Court,
are "ACTING" as ANY court,
in ANY Cities, Counties, States, districts, parishes, territories, AND any State of Appeals, or any
"Federal District, or Bankrupsy, or Tax or Federal Criminal, or Civil, or any Justice of the Peace COURT, or
Municipal COURTS, Or Traffic, or Lawn Care, etc., etc., etc., or any other "court" between them to the
United States SUPREME COURT!

FACT... IF IT IS Named or CALLED a COURT, it is to ABIDE, ADHEAR, by the
United States SUPREME COURT RULINGS / VERDICTS / ORDERS, and ONLY when ...
100% constitutional ! And to many "pretend-a-juges" do NOT have a clue what that means!

AGAIN. . . for those who have not quite LEARNED YET.....
"Stare Decisis"
meaning . . .
"All judges are bound to follow precedent of earlier decisions."
OR YOU / THEY ARE NOT JUDGES!
And this was provided in
common English, that did NOT mean
NOT abiding by "some traffic," grass,
parking ticket, nor Juvenile, or Animal Control court, or
Family, OR any what the FLIP Other NAMED ANYTHIG ELSE thing
(and any OTHER quasi-court, UNTIL we get you
into the
United States
SUPREME
COURT And the US CONSTITUTION, ALL OF IT that was LAWFULL RATIFIED by 3/4 of the STATES!!
OR.... ON YOUR DIME and on YOUR JAIL TIME!

Another EXAMPLE would be....
The Head CEO states
. . . "IT IS SO ORDERED!"
and EVERYONE below the HEAD CEO
do what was so "ORDERED!"
Which would be like....
the United States SUPREME Court
stating. . .
"IT IS SO ORDERED!"

BECAUSE .... That is NOT an . . .
"if you feel like it, or do not feel like following THEIR
**LAWFUL CONSTITUTIONAL DECISIONS,** NOPE not your choice! And again, and AGAIN...
ONLY IF their VERDICTS are NOT 100% Constitutional, they have
VIOLATED THEIR OATH OF OFFICE ALSO..it is an . . .

BUT IF THEIR VERDICT was 100% Constitutional....
"O-R-D-E-R" to do so,
by THE "S-U-P-R-E-M-E" "RULER" / AGENT,
HEAD CEO of the "JUDICIAL SYSTEM!"
AND ....
NOT if your so-called
"inferior judges,"
of any
so-called "justice of the peace court,"
nor any "municipal court,"
nor so-called
municipal court"
or any "family court,"
nor any "juvinal court,"
nor any "county court,"
nor any "district court,"
nor any "appeals court,
nor state supreme court,"
nor any "tax court,"
nor any "FEDERAL Court,
nor ANY OTHER Quasi- COURT,
nor whatever the "IMPOSTERS" /
"IMPERSONATORS"
think to do or call themselves,
"other-than-wise" as.
So for a "reiteration". . .
The United States S-U-P-R-E-M-E Court SAID IT,
SO "JUST DO IT!"
IT IS SO
"ORDERED!"

"JUST DO IT,"
and EXACTLY THAT WAY, or SUFFER AT YOUR OWN PERIL,
danger, risk, demise, "job loss,"
down fall ETC, and with
"TRIPLE DAMAGE$,"
at that, and
"PRISON TIME for VIOLATING your Oath of Office!"
(WOOPY! Who-rah! I'd vote for all that!)

The "LAW-LESS INFERIOR"
(means with-out or OUTSIDE the LAW,)
or any of the pretended
"courts" want YOU to "OBEY"
"their"pretended-court "orders," but without an actual
"REAL LAW"
(example Title 42 U.S.C or Title 42 C.F.R
AND.... Title 47 U.S.C and 20 PLUS OTHERS as the CDC, HHS, FDA, FCC ETC., ETC....)
since these "NON JURY TRAIL" quasi-fake-courts PRETEND that they...
DO NOT need to follow, (obey or adhere to.)
"THEIR" SUPREME COURT RULINGS
(THEIR ....Head CEO's) "ORDERS."
BUT as in "hind-end sight," they want "YOU"
to OBEY their "law-less odors, (lol,)
and NON Jury Trail verdicts."

Remember: an UN-Constitutional "order"
does NOT
have to be "obeyed,"
as neither does any
UN-Constitutional ILLEGAL NON-LAW(S). Coming up just below...
NOW one of my next most favor- right,
actual, factual US. SUPREME COURT Case
"LAW VERDICTS"
is as follows . . . .

[QUOTING From a real SUPREME Court
Article 3 Bill of RIGHTS JUDGE → HERE . . . . ]
PLEASE STUDY the following....

"An unconstitutional act is not a law;
it confers no rights; it imposes no duties;
it affords no protection; it creates no office; it is,
in legal contemplation, as inoperative
as though it had never been passed."
[end of quote.]
United States Supreme Court:
NORTON v. SHELBY COUNTY(1886) No. 264 → HERE

NOTICE: That "VERDICT," or that...
"Case L-A-W"
has never been overruled,
nor overturned,
nor set aside,
so it still
STANDS TODAY, as an "O-R-D-E-R," to ALL
so-called "INFERIOR" courts."

LET US, and all the "skimmers and grinners," RE-View that "Case L-A-W". . . .
that pertains directly to
ALL other PRETENDED "DECISIONS,"
FAKE VERDICTS without or OUTSIDE any "JURY TRIALS"
or "fake orders," in ALL them "LOWER" courts,
that have "NO CLUE" on any of
"subject matter of this site!"

Which are "VOID," and also TOTALLY "UNCONSTITUTIONAL"
when used "against We the People."

1. "An unconstitutional act is not a law. . .
that really means it is . . .
"NOT a L-A-W!"

2. "it confers no rights;" (on ANY so-called "law enforcement,
nor "NON-TRIAL-Quasi-courts-judges-prosicutors. PO, or Process Servers... ETC.)

3. "it imposes no duties;" (on US, "We the People."
to abide by, NOR "obey, NOR be "judged by.")

4. "it affords no protection;" (Nope, NOT One
Sub Atomic .... SPECK of **IMMUNITY 'Protection"
to ANY so called any "law enforcement," nor any
"NON-TRIAL-Quasi-pretend-duh-courts.
Means ALL of them have "NO IMMUNITY, ZERO, NADA, NONE!")

5. "it creates no office;" (gives "NO LAW-FULL
AUTHORITY,"nor ANY "Jurisdiction"
over anyone, anytime, anywhere,
in any "flipping way, shape or form!")

6. "it is, in legal contemplation, as inoperative as
though it had never been passed."
(BINGO . . . PLUS "TRIPLE DAMAGE $$$!")

NOW, those 6 Parts of a "RULING"
("again R-U-L-I-N-G" means it "RULES," is the AUTHORTY)....
which actually STATES
what this site is all about, which is there exists,
"NO immunity" (see NO. 4. above,) in any
"ACTION for any reason,"
AND,
If the perps (perpetrators) could only
R-E-A-D, AND,
could understand what those WORDS
STATED, . . . .
that one CASE, should Totally
STOP/ CEASE any
and ALL "LEOd" (Law Enforcement Officers,)
and or ANY and ALL "JOs"
(pretended "Judicial Officers,")
and like any "clerks of court (Cofs)
and ALL prosecutors,
and all
"process servers," of any city, county, state, or federal,
(refer to NOs. 2., 4., 5. and 6. just above,)
and. or anyone else connected to said
(NON) "jurisdictional" ACTORS in their OWN
FAKE "NON-TRIAL quasi-court "TRAPS."

And as an PRIME.....Example: OF a Corporate Jurisdictional CODE is...
Title 42 U.S.C (such as Family Courts (sick) and the NGOs= HHS, FDA, CDC
And any and ALL SUBCONTRACTED NGOs
pretended RULES, (for PROFIT,) that has
(as in Paste Tense,)....
Never Been (that means NEVER EVER has been,)
"Codified"
NOR "ENACTED,"
NOR made into "POSITIVE LAW."

which is being stated Under the
"FAIR USE Positive Law Title 17 U.S.C Sec. 107, for
"Education Purposes"
only as follows. . .

QUOTING from (in part from . . . )
uscode.house.gov/codification/term_positive_law.htm . . .
HERE

"in general, the term "positive law" connotes statutes, i.e.,
law that has been enacted by a duly authorized legislature."
GUILTY, on ALL COUNTS!

SO. . .
what is the OPPOSITE of a. . .
"law that has NOT been enacted by a duly authorized legislature!"

OH YES. "a NON LAW . . . that
"HAS NOT "been enacted,"
by a "NON-Authorized NON-Legislature,"
that is what that is . . .
"NON-Judicial,
NON-Authority granting,
NON- Subject Matter granting,
F-A-K-E
NON-"LAW,"
when it is a "NON-Positive,"
and "NON-CODIFIED"
and NON-"PASSED
as a POSITIVE LAW,"
making it a "NON-L-A-W."
[and all the "totally illiterate" just blink, and than say, Oh "yes it is!"]

AND...
That is a "No Brain-er" when anyone can NOT understand that "SIMPLE FACT."
NOT ONLY
are they legally, and law-fully UN-FIT for ANY "Public OFFICE," they need to be
"INCARCERATED" until they PAY for their CRIME$$$.

"Positive law typically consists of enacted law—
the codes, statutes, and regulations that are applied
and enforced in the courts.
The term derives from the medieval use of positum
(Latin "established"),
so that the phrase positive law literally means
law established by human authority."
Black's Law Dictionary 1200 (8th ed. 2004) → HERE or → HERE

So what does the WORDS mean stated above that said . . .
"Positive law typically consists of enacted law —
the codes, statutes, and regulations that are applied and enforced in the courts."
[end of quote.]

OH.... that means.... that... ONLY. . .
"Positive law - are "enacted" as codes, statutes, and or "regulations (RULES),"
are THE ONLY L-A-W-S . . .
"that are (SUPOSED to be,) applied and enforced in the courts."

The REST, "NON-Positive laws" DO NOT APPLY, AGAINST US,
nor AFFORDS ANY "AUTHORITY,"
NOR "FORCE OF LAW,"
nor are to be used AGAINST US, and only APPLIES to . . . THEM!

"Positive laws (Latin: ius positum) are human-made laws
that oblige or specify an action.
It also describes the establishment of specific rights
for an individual or group.
Etymologically, the name derives from the verb to posit.".

DID YOU HAPPEN TO SEE THE
WORDS...
"POSITIVE LAWS". . ,
and
"It also describes the establishment of specific rights
for an individual or group."

OH YEA....
A "NEGATIVE NON-LAW" that DO NOT "describe(s) the establishment of specific rights
for an individual or group."

AND IF THAT "RICO GROUP," such as any quasi-court are attempting to USE
"NON POSITIVE"
NON-LAWS against us?
WOE! CHA-CHING! TRIPLE DAMAGES $ $ $, and JAIL TIME for the PERPS!

(MORE ON "POSITIVE LAW," and the "Statutes and Codes that pertain directly
to ONLY THEM. → HERE! )

THEN FOLLOWING "ACTIONS" of "their crimes," COMES INTO EFFECT. . .
for starting actions against ANYONE, including....
Judges, Prosicutors, their Clerks of Court,
AND ALL Guardian Ad Litems and ALL Child Services,
and all City, County or State, or Federal LAW OFFICERS,
and ALL City Councels and ALL County or State Police, and ALL Prosecutors,
and All "Clerks of ANY court, NOW LET US....
VIEW what these perps, (perpetrators,) get themselves into. . .
A "POSITIVE LAW". . . found at . . . .

"If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten,
or intimidate any person in any State,
Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District
in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right
or privilege
secured to him (or her,) by the Constitution
or laws of the United States,
or because of his having so exercised the same
or
If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway,
or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his (or her,) free exercise
or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured-

They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years,
or both;
and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section
or if such acts include (but not limited to,) kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap,
aggravated sexual abuse,
or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse,
or an attempt to kill,
they shall be fined under this title
or imprisoned for any term of years or for life,
or both,
or may be sentenced to death."
[end of quote. and AGAIN, in case anyone "Skimmed and Grinned," any two or more . . . includes,
but not limited to, any LISTED JUST ABOVE.]

YES.... and the "they" do NOT have to "PLAN to commit a FELONY,"
ALL they have to do is
"APPLY an UNCONSTITUTIONAL"
pretend a law,
(also known as the "color of law,"
by any "NON-ENACTED-NON-Codified-NON-POSITIVE ACT,
also known as
"prima facie" which means....
"At first look as fact presumed to be true unless it is disproved (as a law,)"
as in
"UNCONSTITUTIONAL Act," (As in a FICITIONAL PLAY!)
THEN the "perps" get to enjoy G-POP (General Population)
in a Federal Penitentiary., at 10 YEARS,
**PER COUNT.**

Codes and supplements as evidence of the laws of United States
and District of Columbia; citation of Codes
and supplements.

Provided, however that whenever titles of such Code shall have been
enacted into positive law the text thereof
shall be legal evidence of the laws therein contained,
in all courts of the United States,
the several states, and the territories
and insular possessions of the United States.
[end of quote.]

SO.... that means any "NON-ENACTED" "Statute"
"NON-Positive, NON-CODIFIED INTO, NOT... REAL LAW,"
that "text thereof shall," NOT . . .
"be legal evidence....in ALL the courts of the United States.

Please Take JUDICIAL NOTICE the "words pertaining directly,
to the "NON-POSITIVE law"
equals the legal phrase . . .
"color of law" and .... again for as . . .from the site HOUSE.GOV... "An Example, any. . .
Title 42 U.S.C.
"NON-POSITIVE,"
and "Non-Enacted,"
NON-Lawful-Courts of the
"United States [Inc.] (see here ** )."
Funded
(FAKE, FRAUDLANT Fed Pay Offs,)
just call themselves, "family courts," which are
" . . . such acts include kidnapping, and or an attempt to kidnap. . ."
since that CODE (Title 42,) that is
actually a FAKE, "color of law," (colored to look like a law,)
pertains ONLY directly to
ONLY Federal and State employees,
and or a Federal or State Sub-Contractor(s,)
and or their families,
ONLY. . . unless "we the people CONSENT On the RECORD,"
to abide by Title 42, U.S.C.
under a "fully disclosed"
(explained.) As a LAWFUL
4 (FOUR) element, contract, is as follows....
For a BENEFIT!
1. the "offer" is a "fully disclosed" contract, and . .

2. parties that understand the entirety of the
contract, as in the phrase "meeting of the minds"

3. legal subject matter, or has to be LEGAL,
see NORTON v. SHELBY COUNTY(1886) No. 264 again. (and

4. and the "acceptance," and if the "contract'
runs more than a YEAR, it has to be writing.

SO as ONE EXAMPLE above, or Title 42 U.S.C is
NOT "ENACTED" as "Positive LAW" to be, ILL- LEGAL,
NOR Binding, NOR LAWFUL to gain any "subject matter"
NOR any "personal jurisdiction," over Any
NON-Federal / or STATE employees, and their immediate families,
and nor any Sub-Contractors,
and their immediate families,
with a 4 (FOUR,) ELEMENT CONTRACT.

By contrast, Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare,
is a non-positive law title.
Title 42 is comprised of many individually
enacted Federal statutes--
such as the Public Health Service Act
and the Social Security Act--that have been
editorially compiled and organized into the title,
but
the title itself has not been enacted.
[end of quote.] uscode.house.gov/codification/legislation.shtmluscode.
house.gov/codification/legislation.shtml HERE

The United States Code is divided into subject matter titles.
Some are "positive law" titles and some are "non-positive law" titles.

The difference is this:
A positive law title of the United States Code is - itself - a Federal statute.

A non-positive law title of the United States Code is an editorial compilation of Federal statutes.

For example, title 10, United States Code,
"Armed Forces", is a positive law title because the title, per se, has been explicitly enacted.

Alternatively, title 42, United States Code,
"The Public Health and Welfare", is a non-positive law title.
The Federal statutes set out editorially in title 42
have been explicitly enacted, but title 42, per se, has not.

Provisions set out in non-positive law titles
of the United States Code may vary slightly from the precise
language enacted into law; cross references
are adapted and stylistic changes are made in order
to facilitate the integration of Federal statutory provisions
into the United States Code.
By contrast, a positive law title of the United States Code
constitutes the precise statutory language enacted into law.
[end of quote.]
http://uscode.house.gov/codification/positive_law_codification.pdf → HERE

"Alternatively, title 42, United States Code,
"The Public Health and Welfare", is a non-positive law title.
The Federal statutes set out editorially in title 42 have been explicitly enacted,
but title 42, per se, has not."
[end of quote. → HERE ]

SO just another FACT of "specific evidence" that the EXAMPLE Title 42 U.S.C IS NOT
"A NON-POSITIVE LAW TITLE!" . . .
and "NOT EXPLICITLY ENACTED!"

.... When these "ACTORS ACT"....
"under the color of law," pertaining to
unlawful judges, or unlawful prosecutors or unlawful "clerks of a
unlawful court," THEY ARE NOT, and CAN NEVER BE SUCH,
in any sense of the DEFINITIONS thereof.
AND without OUR
"FULL KNOWLEDGEABLE CONSENT,"
it is a FEDERAL FELONY / FRAUD to pretended "jurisdiction,"
and, or any "legal or lawful complicity,"
what-so-ever!

[QUOTING, as follows. . .
and try to RE-read it until it you all comprehend it totally,!]

PENHALLOW v. DOANE'S ADMINISTRATORS
(Supreme Court of the United States 1795) → HERE
"Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person,
an abstraction,
and a creature of the mind only,
a government can interface only with other artificial persons.
The imaginary, having neither actuality
nor substance,
is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible.
The legal manifestation of this is that no government,
as well as any law, agency, aspect,
court, etc.
can concern itself with anything other than corporate,
artificial persons
and the contracts between them."
[end of copied and pasted.]

1. "Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person,". . .
NOW. . .
DID that BRAKE THE ICING ON THEIR FAKE COURT CAKE?
And if any entity, or group of people,
whoever,
work for ANY "government" agency,
City, County or State
(all are sub-contracted to the FEDERAL)
government,
they ALL are in fact are IN FACT are "Artificial persons," ALSO . . .

THAT "T-R-U-T-H sounds "stranger," then the FICTION
we are all were TAUGHT! HUH?

WHY NOT JUST "ALLOW,"
(and how long should it take to JUST "allow,") the TRUTH to SET YOU FREE!
READY... GO...
"government can interface only with other artificial persons."

SO that SAID....
GOVERNMENT IS SUPPOSED TO INTERACT WITH ONLY OTHER GOVERNMENT entities!"

And that means supposed to "judged" / adjudicate
ONLY OTHER GOVERNMENT agents of GOVERNMENT
agencies. UNLESS one of them is an
"artificial" persons,"
or any agents of the principal, COMMIT A CRIME,
against of ONE OF THEIR
United States Codes,
and or
State or
Federal Regulations,
and or State Statutes.
than
"WE the PEOPLE" ARE THE PLAINTIFFS against them in OUR "Jury Trial" courts!

WE the PEOPLE.... can lawfully have "court" over any one of "them," legally
or more of their "artificial persons," FICTIONS...
via a "TRIAL BY JURY" in one of "their" FICITIONAL courts.

SO THAT IS THE ONLY WAY THAT "THEIR COURTS"
SUPPOSED TO HAVE "TRIALS" FOR (or Against.)

IF the answer is. . . . "NO" . . .
than the "THEY" have
TO PROVE YOU ARE AN ARTIFICAL PERSON
or they have ....
NO "subject matter jurisdiction,"
NOR ANY "PERSONAL JURISDICTION,"
NOR ANY "JUDICIAL STANDING,"
NOR ANY, ANYTING..... what so flipping EVER,
over ANY of OUR, AFFAIRS, by "any of their" contrived CORPORATE . . .
"NON-Positive LAWS,
Statutes, Any Codes, Rules, or REGULATIONS,"
and duh "they" are NOT even to communicate with you without YOUR TOTAL PERMISSION.

THEY also lied, committed
FRAUD, Extortion,
pretending / ACTING as REAL "courts."
But YOU ALL ARE NOT "ARTIFICIAL PERSONS, like them."
Some, if NOT most, bar carders, were taught how. . .
"NOT TO READ,"
the actual words in a simple statement, and or question.

3. AND to be more CONCLUSIVE ....
"The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance,
is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible,"

JUDICIAL NOTICE:
WE the People, ARE THE ONLY "TANGIBLE,"
and NOT duh they, who are the "ARTIFICIAL PERSONS."
YOU ARE STOPPED, which Equals "Forclosed!"
(most ALL "bar carders" and ALL are quasi-judges,
won't know what a
"Judicial Notice,"
means, just like they do NOT know
how to have a "LAWFUL"We the People's Trial by our PeerS... Jury"
or
what was a real law-full court, is in reality.

THAT PERTAINS TO ANY,
NON JUDICIAL, NON-JURY TRIAL,
UN-CONSTITUTIONAL
"artificial persons"

Examples, AGAIN....just to name just FEW,
such as.... any and ALL
Family (pretended) Courts,
and Municipal (pretended) Courts,
and Justice of the Peace (pretended) Courts,
and ANY OTHER """NON TRIAL,""""
quasi governmental agents,
and ANY AND ALL NON-COMMON LAW,
ARE ALL "artificial persons,"
or "government" agencies."
City, County, State or Federal.

4. AND....QUOTING . . .
"The legal manifestation of this is that
NO government, as well as any law, agency,
aspect, court, etc.
can concern itself with anything
other than corporate,
artificial persons
and the contracts between them."
[end of quote.]

SINCE, only the "artificial, CORPORATE,
ADMINISTRATIVE, government, and artificial
FRAUDULENT COURT'S, agents, can ONLY under a
"legal manifestation of this is that NO government,
as well as any law, agency, aspect, court, etc.
can concern itself with anything other than
corporate, artificial persons
and the contracts between them."
[end of quote.]

SO .... WE DEMAND these "artificial" courts.....
for their evidence, ON their AFFIDAVITES,
NOTORIZED,
of THEIR ABSOLUTE PROOF THAT . . .
"WE are NOT the Living People,
(ON THE RECORD,")
are evidence that proves we are
"Artificial PERSONS?"

AND "IF" the "ACTORS" could READ. . .
(that be like a "heaven on earth," SITUATION.")
But they can NOT read thru "GREED stained bar cards."

The following
US SUPREME Court Case LAW,
pertains directly to any and
ALL
"NON-JURY,"
NON-Judicial,
NON-Courts,
and any and
ALL agencies of any city,
county or state, or federal (sounding)
named agency . . . .
Copied and Pasted, in part....]

"Corporations are also of all grades,
and made for varied objects;
all governments are corporations,
created by usage and common consent,
or grants and charters
which create a body politic for prescribed purposes;
but whether they are private,
local or general, in their objects,
for the enjoyment of property,
or the exercise of power,
they are all governed by the same
rules of law, as to the construction
and the obligation of the instrument by which the incorporation is made.

One universal rule of law protects persons and property.
It is a fundamental principle of the
common law of England,
that the term freemen of the kingdom,
includes 'all persons,'
ecclesiastical and temporal,
incorporate, politique or natural;
it is a part of their magna charta. . ."

2 Inst. 46-7. 'No man shall be taken,' 'no man shall be disseised,'
without due process of law,is a principle taken from magna charta,
infused into all our state constitutions, and is made inviolable by the federal government,
by the amendments to the constitution."
[Proprietors of Charles River Bridge v. Proprietors of,
36 U.S. 420 (1837)]
[Found → HERE or → HERE ]

AND THE NEXT
"SUPREME COURT CASE LAW CASE"
is as follows. . . THAT STANDS TODAY, NOW, FOREVER!

HALE v. HENKEL 201 U.S. 43 at 89 (1906) HERE
[most viewers, will, and or, should re-read
the following more than twice ( or better at least 3 TIMES),
to re-place the
"lies" that your, [and or your quasi-teachers,
Tele-ya-vision,]
may have lied to you, [and to themselves,]
about the HISTORY OF LAW . . .
while you, or they were "falsely" believing that they were
"Studying" LAW?". . . . ]

"The "individual" may stand upon "his Constitutional Rights"
as a CITIZEN.
He is entitled to carry on his
"private" business in his own way."
His power to contract is unlimited."
He owes no duty to the State
or to his neighbors to divulge his business,
or to open his doors to an investigation,
so far as it may tend to incriminate him.
He owes no duty to the State,
since he receives nothing there from,
beyond the protection of his life and property.
"His rights" are such as "existed"
by the Law of the Land
(Common Law)
"long antecedent" to the organization of the State",
and can only be taken from him by
"due process of law",
and "in accordance with the Constitution."
"He owes nothing to the public so long as he does not trespass
upon their rights."
[end of quote. And I should not have to use words like
"Emphasis added,"
for anyone that actually has an IQ above their belt size.
And the word "individual" in that statement means ALL of
"WE the living People," un-like the same word,
with a totally different meaning used in United States Codes.]

The CASES LISTED HEREIN ARE A
"JUDICIAL WARNING"
TO
"ALL" COURT PERSONAL and
Pretending "PUBLIC, City, County, State ETC.... OFFICERS!":

Including ALL "judges," and or ALL prosecutors, and or
ALL clerks, and or ALL bailiffs,
and
ALL Police, And ALL So-Called Health Officials,
and ETC., ETC., ETC., ETC,.

AND
ANY AND ALL OTHER
"NON-Positive Law"
Quasi-GOVERNMENT AGENCIES,
Departments, State, City, County,
Township OR "Home Owners ASSociation!" ETC ETC

NOT ONLY does the "Case LAW" Rules,
but ALSO the ALL the United States Codes
shall be applied within the "States"
as in 28 U.S.C. § 1652 -
Judiciary and Judicial Procedure § 1652.
State laws asrules of decision.

"The laws of the several states, except where the Constitution
or treaties of the United States
or Acts of Congress
otherwise requireor provide,
shall be regarded asrules of decision in civil actions in the courts of the
United States,
in cases where they apply."
[Refer to * 28 U.S.C. § 3002 below.
(a "Positive Law." )]
[end of quote]

Yes "RICO GANG,"
"IN THE COURTS of the US,"
and that includes so-called:
traffic,
municipal,
JP,
county,
dog catcher,
family,
district,
appeals,
state supreme,
federal court,
federal appeals, and
so-called "bankruptcy,
and or any
"tax court!"
AND ANY AND ALL of
THE *FIPPING* REST OF THEIR,
NON TRAIL,
NON JUDICIAL,
UN LAW-FOOL,
NON-COURTS,
PRETENDING TO BE... SOMETHING THEY ARE NOT !

FACT: IF it has the word
"COURT" in IT'S TITLE,
than ALL of the
"BILL OR RIGHTS,"
and ALL the U.S.C,
and ALLthe Federal and STATE,
Rules of Criminal
and CIVIL PROCEDURE,
and is FOUND in
ALL STATES
and FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONS
pertains
DIRECTLY to "ALL" OF THEM.

That pertains DIRECTLY to ANY
"court"
anywhere IN THE UNITED STATES.
Unless they File... and POST..... an . .
"Signed and Notorized Demand for an AFFIDAVIT of FACT,
that they are NOT a "Corporate,
nor an Incorporated" entity,"
And they are Applying only
"Positive, Enacted, and Codified LAW!"
Signed Under the Pains and Penalty,
and under "Full Liability" [not lie-ability,]
and provide evidance, they have.
that WE have been PROVEN to also,
ARTIFICAL Persons, to gain,
any "subject matter jurisdiction," and any
"personal jurisdiction,"
co-signed by all judges,
all prosecutors, and all clerk of court's, etc., etc.,
in said action, in and by their very own hands,'
and their quasi-court Seal
affixed to their AFFIDAVIT(S),
and than . . . NOTARIZED!
(Write one yourself, DIY ....
as in "Tweak" one of the ones → HERE )

1. and Write, or Copy in and paste into a. . .
2. Document following in the Affidavit,

1. "Silence Equals Consent" by NOT responding to
"AFFIDAVIT DEMAND"
Warn them if they try to IGNOR any
"Demand for Affidavit"
becomes lawful, legal evidance of FACTS in a
"Jury by Trial"!

2. IT automatically becomes
"Evidence of their
CORPORATE,Administrative, NON Judicial Status,"
and will be used in one of THEIR CORPORATE Superior COURTS under an
"Grand Jury INDICTMENT,"
and or a Federal "TRIAL BY JURY."

3. And tell them that they are all invited to the INTERNATIONAL COURT . . .
PDF Handbook → HERE

MORE "POSITIVE LAW" as follows.....
For "Impersonating" ANY officer of the United States
(Federal, and or State (any and ALL inferior courts,)
is a federal felony violation of

"Whoever falsely assumes or pretends to
be an officer or employee acting under the authority
of the United States
or any department, agency or officer thereof,
and acts as such,
or in such pretended character demands
or obtains any money, paper, document,
or thing of value,
shall be fined under this title
or imprisoned not more than three years,
or both."

Aiding and abetting such impersonation
is a felony violation of 18 U.S.C. 3 .
as an "accessory after (before or during,) the fact."

"Whoever, knowing that an offense against
the United States has been committed,
receives, relieves, comforts or assists
the offender in order to hinder or prevent his apprehension,
trial or punishment,
is an accessory after the fact.

Except as otherwise expressly provided by any Act of Congress,
an accessory
after the fact shall be imprisoned
not more than
one-half the maximum term of imprisonment or . . .
fined not more than one-half the
maximum fine prescribed for the punishment of
the principal, or both;
or if the principal is punishable by life imprisonment or death,
the accessory shall be imprisoned not more
than 15 years."
[end of quote.]

AGAIN!....
"an accessory after the factshall be imprisoned
not more than one-half the maximum term of imprisonment or . . .
fined not more than one-half the
maximum fine prescribed for the punishment of
the principal, or both;

When ANYONE TELLS ANYONE ELSE, that a crime is has been committed
OR is being committed,
and that "anyone else" is in ANY "law enforcement, AND OR. . .
ANY judicial. AND OR . . .
or governmental compactly,"
and they do
NOT DO ANYTHING TO STOPthe criminals,
nor notify other "LEOs or JOs.
"IMMEDIATELY: they become. . .
the "WHOEVER[s]" . . . .
ANY and ALL OF THEM, have ALSO"
VIOLATED" the following LAW.

Whoever,
having knowledge of the actual commissionof a felony cognizable by a
court of the United States,
conceals and does not as soon as possible
make known the same to some judge or other person in civil
or military authority under the United States,
shall be fined under this title
or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

[end of quote. SO "we" all ought to
"Make it known,"
asap, if we can find a R-E-A-L "judge"]

"Falsifying or concealing a material fact that is within the jurisdiction
of any branch of the Federal government,
and is another felony violation of . . ."

Except as otherwise provided in this section,
whoever,
in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive,
legislative,
or judicial branch of the knowingly, willfully-- ,
(a) falsifies, fact; Government of the United States
conceals,
or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact;

(1) makes any representation; materially false,
fictitious, or fraudulent statement or

(2) or materially makes or uses any false writing
or document knowing the same to contain any false,

(3) fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry; shall be fined
under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years."
[end of quote.]

Transmitting false and /or fraudulent court "process,"
subpoenas, records, transcripts,
and or orders ETC., ETC., via U.S.
Mail, is in fact is mail fraud,
Includes posting in an newspaper,
or on the "internet,"
or on any "search warrants,"
or any "arrest warrants,"
or any another felony violation of the following. . .

Whoever,
having devised or intending to devise
any scheme or artifice to defraud,
or for obtaining money or property
by means of false or fraudulent pretenses,
representations . . .
for the purpose of executing such scheme
or artifice or attempting so to do,
places in any post office or authorized depository
for mail matter, any matter or thing whatever
to be sent or delivered by the Postal Service,
or deposits or causes to be deposited
any matter
or thing whatever to be sent
or delivered by any private or commercial interstate carrier. . .
shall be fined under this title
or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both . . . "
[end of quote. that also includes,
"Public Notices" in news papers, which is "Defamation of Character," FRAUD!
or uploaded,
and or posted into the internet,
which is covered by the words . . .

"sent or delivered by any private or commercial interstate carrier. . ."
The internet is an "interstate," , "carrier."]

Moreover, "mail fraud," is also one of the
RICO "predicate acts" itemized at
18 U.S.C. 1961 et seq.
See also 28 U.S.C. 1691 in this context.
(to name a few of the 10 more FEDERAL
CRIMINAL STATUTES
that RULE any, and ALL COURT PERSONAL
Within the BORDERS of the United States.)

[QUOTING . . . . what most, lie repeaters call a "conspiracy theory,"
but it is an actual, factual POSITIVE LAW, Statute,
that states the following....
copied and pasted.... ]

(14) " State " means any of the several States,
the District of Columbia,
the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico,
the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas,
or any territory or possession of the United States

(B) an agency, department, commission,
board, or other entity
of the United States; or

to RULE in using the "Definition" of "United States,"
with (A) a " Federal Corporation,"
by injecting the meaning, into (B) and (C) as follows. . . .]

(B) an agency, department, commission, board,
or other entity of the "Federal corporation;" or

(14) " State " means . . . .
[a] " possession of the United States
[A Federal Corporation.]"

SO, . . . FACT:
There is NO REAL, DEJURE, (equals any TRUE,
REAL, ACTRUAL,)
"STATE and or FEDERAL
" government" / COURTS, Agencies, Departments,
of and by "We the People" of the united states of America.
That includes ALL
City, County as
Sub-Contractor's of United States.
AND you do not have to believe that for it,
for that to still be a FACT.
That's the bad news!

But YOU CAN FORCE
THESE PERPS / Perpetrators
/ "ACTORS" INTO "THEIR" so-called
HIGHER COURTS,
to have "THEM" TRIED BY
A "Trial by JURY," as a "REMEDY,"
and at "TRIPLE DAMAGE VIA A
"FEDERAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT."

AND if the OTHER "ACTORS" / "PRETENDED"
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, COURTS, etc., etc., etc.,
DO NOT ACT UPON SAID "FILED" FED COMPLAINT,
THEY CAN "JOIN" INTO THE CONSPIRACY

Whoever,
with intent to avoid, evade,
prevent, or obstruct compliance, in whole
or in part, with any civil investigative demand
duly and properly made under the
Antitrust Civil Process Act, willfully withholds,
misrepresents, removes from any place,
conceals, covers up, destroys, mutilates,
alters, or by other means falsifies any
documentary material, answers to written
interrogatories,or oral testimony, which is the
subject of such demand;
or attempts to do so or
solicits another to do so; or
Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force,
or by any threatening letter or
communication influences,
obstructs, or impedes or
endeavors to influence,
obstruct, or impede the due and proper
administration of the law under which any
pending proceeding
is being had before any department
or agency of the United States,
or the due and proper exercise of the power
of inquiry under which any inquiry or. . .

Shall be fined under this title,imprisoned not more than 5 years . . ."
[end of quote.]

Whoever feloniously steals, takes away,
alters, falsifies, or otherwise avoids any record,
writ, process, or other proceeding,
in any court of the United States,
whereby any judgment is reversed, made void,
or does not take effect;

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned
not more than five years, or both.
[end of quote.]

[QUOTING . . . . And here is a GREAT AFFIRMATION
for "It is so ORDERED"
issued by the United States Supreme Court,
as in THEIR "IT IS SO ORDERED" challenge. ]

Whoever, by threats or force, willfully prevents,
obstructs, impedes, or interferes with,
or willfully attempts to prevent, obstruct, impede,
or interfere with, the due exercise of rights
or the performance of duties under any order,
judgment, or decree of a court of the United States,
shall be fined under this title
or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

No injunctive or other civil relief against the conduct made criminal
by this section shall be denied on the ground that such conduct is a crime.
[end of quote. Copied and pasted....]

This is an actual "NOTICE" that anyoneor ALL
the Whoever(s) (which can include you,)
who READS THIS
"NOTICE,"
is being duly "NOTIFIED," as the
"WHO-EVERS"
MENTIONED ABOVE in the
"Title 18 U.S.C." (which includes, but not limited to,)
to ANY and ALL ...
PO ("Police Officers,)
and ANY AND ALL LEOs (Law Enforcement Officers,)
and ANY and ALL JOs (Judicial Officers,including prosecutors,
clerks, bailiffs, or transcribers etc. etc) OF THAT FACT,
AS A WARNING
AT THE BEGINNING OF THE COMPLAINT
RIGHT AFTER THE HEADING
of the Federal Criminal Complaint.

ANY OR ALL OF THE LINKED SITES, on this site,
may (or may,) NOT Agree, with any of the
"subject matter," on this site.

SO With that FACT in Mind....."NONE of the LINKED SITES ARE
"LIABLE" NOR RESPONSABLEFOR ANYTHING ON THIS SITE."

AND. . . We are "NOT" RESPONSIBLE for any "DEAD" Links!
BUT YOU can kindly, Let Us Know,
and when we get time, we will attempt to fix,
or what needs to be to updated in any "dead" links.

Bouvier's LAW DICTIONARY → HERE

Black's Law Dictionary - Free Online → HERE

ALL Municipal, and
ALL JP /
ALL Constable,
and ALL Traffic, courts (?)
are in
"TOTAL LACK of LAWFUL
"Subject Matter Jurisdiction"
AND "Personal Matter Jurisdiction"
to LEGALLY issue any "search warrants"
and or any
"arrest warrants,"
that upon conviction could end
in ANY "Jail Time" what so ever.

LAW-FULLY . . .
NO...
THEY CAN NOT JAIL ANYONE
WITHOUT A "TRIAL BY JURY!"
FACT: They, which are ALL mentioned,
after the FACT:,
are
ALL ONLY

OR "HELP" PROMOTE and GROW THIS
SITE FOR FREE
SinceTHE FOLLOWING SITES
are "SUBMIT SITES"SO "ADD YOUR SITE" from the

*** "ANY LINKED" SITES, above may or may NOT agree with SOME, or ALL
of the "Subject Matter" contained herein,
and are only provided as "EDUCATIONAL
REFERENCE MATERIAL," FOR "RESEARCH,"
and are totally HERE under the "FARE USE POSITIVE LAW,"
Title 17 USC Sec 102 and 105 and 107
and MOSTLY....under the "First Amendment"
of the united states Constitution,
called the
"Freedom of Speech."

** THIS_IS_THE DISCLAIMER_ at_the_END_of_this_Web_Page: **
SO YOU DON'T WASTE "yOUR" TIME. . .
WE ARE NOT LEGALLY, nor MORALLY
RESPONSIBLE
FOR ANYTHING YOU DO,
AND, OR, YOU DO NOT DO,
IF YOU DO IT INCORRECTLY,
OR . . most of all . . .
YOU DO IT WITH THE WRONG ATTITUDE!
[The "attitude" is a BIG part is about if you "believe" in what you are using, or not,
or if it works, or if it does not work. ATTITUDE!]

If YOU DO NOT "REALLY," and "FULLY" BELIEVE IN WHAT YOU ARE USING WILL WORK,
OR EVEN .....
"IT WILL WORK," equals "The ONLY WORKING ATTITUDE"

BUT. . .
IF YOUR ATTITUDE / Belief is.... "it maybe should work?,"
OR . . .
"has it worked before???????"

OR . . .
"How do you know if it works NOW?????"
than
"THAT IS YOUR FAULT,"and REALLY has NOTHING TO DO
WITH Any of the MATERIAL, and, NOR the Process.

IF YOU DO NOT BELIEVE SOMETHING
WILL WORK....
MORE THAN LIKELY, IT WILL NOT WORK!
SO . . .
YOU SHOULD DO THE "ATTITUDE Adjustments"
BEFORE YOU . . .
1. BEGIN any process, adjust your "feelings"before you file," and

BEFORE ....
2. YOU START THROWING BLAME, on any"anyone else anywhere else!"
Because that "stuff will not FLUSH, anywhere at any time