Help to Translate this site HERE

ImTranslation LINK for this site, just copy LINK / URL
of this page and than paste, in top box..
Than choose your language to be translated to, and click the
"Translate" button lower left of same box.

OR.....

You can also add to add that extension to all the "major" browsers.


just use the button below....

Here 

__________________________________________________

 

WELCOME TO

NOT PRACTICING LAW.INFO 

 

NOTICE:

PLEASE... READ the  "DISCLAIMER": at END of this Page.

BEFORE you Proceed.   HERE.


We know that this PAGE is LONG

But so is any amount of "jail time," or

LOOSING Your children,

and OR your properity  would be....

WITHOUT A "TRIAL BY JURY!!"

SECONDLY. . .
this ENTIRE site, (means all of it,)
and everything on it, is under a
"Positive Law,"
Title 17 U.S.C Sec. 102: and 105,

and under the
"Bill of RIGHTS,"
as the
1st (FIRST) Amendment
of the United States Constitution,
for "Education" and Comment."

AND, Secondly . . . .
        WE ARE NOT "PRACTICING" LAW
BECAUSE WE
KNOW AND LIVE,
THE "
LAW OF COMMON LOGIC,"
AND OR "COMMON SENSE."
And WE DO 
NOT NEED TO "PRACTICE,"
NOR WILL WE NEED TO ASK FOR A LIE-Sense
to
DEFEND OUR RIGHTS AS "FREE LIVING BEINGS."

And WE are NOT some
"CORPORATE FICTION
(S),"
NOR
 "Agent(s)," Employee(s),
Nor
 any "Sub-Contractor(s), for any
"City, County, State,
NOR Federal "CHARTERED" COMPANY
QUASI-
 Court(s),
IMPERSONATING AND
Masquerading (Mask-a-Raiding,)
as any "JUDICIAL Tribunal / courts"

WITHOUT A "TRIAL BY JURY!"

     NOR ARE WE TO BE "CONTRACTED"
(nor placed under ANY "NON"
FULLY DISCLOSED

(non-a-greed) agreed upon a
"FULL 4 (FOUR) Element CONTRACT,"
WITHOUT
"OUR" FULL "On The Record CONSENT,"
at a Fully Guaranteed "JURY TRIAL."

   PREAMBLE :

We the People of the United States,
in Order to form a more perfect Union,
establish Justice, insure domestic
Tranquility,
provide for the common defense,
promote the general Welfare,
and secure the Blessings of Liberty
to ourselves and our Posterity,
do ordain and establish this Constitution
HERE

THAT SAID...

We the People - establish Justice (< and that be "JUST-US,")

We the People - insure domestic Tranquility

­ We the People - provide for the common defense

We the People - promote the general Welfare,

We the People - secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves
and our Posterity,

We the People - do ordain and establish this Constitution

ARE any of you VIEWING this site,
so debased, as to see that there is NO MENTION
of any wordage stating that anyone other than

"We the People
," do not include any words like
"City, or County, and or State, and or ANY Federal,
OR CONGRESS, OR PRISEDENT. . .
Are ANY of THOSE "NGOs" LISTED ABOVE ?
REALLY?

ONLY in a mal-functional mind
would see the words...

"We the People -
do ordain and establish this Constitution,

and than turn 180 Degrees
and GIVE THAT IT AWAY to

"artificial factions!" created by
"WE THE PEOPLE!"

That was a statement,
more than a question!
"WE the People" would NOT give
OUR "RIGHTS"
away to any agency,
or pretended court,
in any location anywhere,
or any group of paid qasi-"representatives,
"
WITHOUT OUR,
"ON THE RECORD," CONSENT!

         NOR ARE WE BOUND BY
ANY MAN MADE LAW(S) READ >
*HERE * )

""WITHOUT OUR CONSENT in Writing!""

Since "We the People"
are the ones whom SET up THE
"Government,"
than

"We the People"

have to 
"CONSENT"
to be "Governed,"
and or "Judged,"

including to, but not limited to,
any summons
into ANY LAW-LESS
(= NOT established by a real
"Positive LAW," by any)
"pretended" quazi-court, or agency
or department, , etc., etc., etc.
or any OTHER, (even hidden) other

"INVOLUNTARY / UNCONSENTED" action.

   BUT...

   IF ANY of "WE the PEOPLE" BREAK the LAW
OF "COMMON SENSE / LOGIC"
BY TRESPASSING, or ENCROACHING,
or HINDERING ANY OTHER LIVING BEINGS,
IN THEIR ENJOYMENT OF THEIR "RIGHTS,"
"We the People"
NEED TO COME TO AN AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
the Assumed "INJURED PARTY,"
"WITHOUT"" THE NEED OF ANY
CORPORATE / COMPANY / CHARTERED,
"court(s),"
IMPERSONATING a
"REAL ARTICLE 3 TRIAL BY JURY,
R-E-A-L COURT."

           ALL NON-Jury-Trial quazi-courts ARE ACTUALLY
"INTERFERING"
THRU THEIR PRETENDED
"ADJUDICATION,"

and OR any need of any REAL Legal
"Arbitration,"

AS PRETENDING TO BE
"JUDICIAL OFFICERS / JUDGES."
(the really sad thing is,
some of these actual and factual
FEDERAL CRIMINALS "ignorantly"
and Arrogantly
believe that they are "real judges,"
which is the height of a "DELUSION OF GRANDEUR,"
to state the very least, of what they really,
and TRULY are
> "................ expletives here ................"
<

  
THEE GOLDEN RULE SHOULD RULE:

     IF ANY of THESE "IMPOSTERS" . . . "summons,"
or demand you to "appear" in their
"LAW-LESS,"
UN
-REAL,
NON
JUDICIAL,
UN
-Constitutional,
ANTI-7th Amendment,
NON JURY TRIAL Action(s)
(civil, ....when their "dispute" is above $20 USD,
or any and all "criminal," which include any "jail time," what so ever...
(and there are NO other types,)
and YOU as a Living Being,
and you are not an employee,
and or not directly connected as a
Sub-Contractor, (as "under a fully informed
SIGNED
"4 Element" contract,"
)
AND Via A LEGAL AFFIDAVIT NOTARIZED by a NOTARY!

into "THEIR" Public, / Private Corporation, hearings
THAN the FOLLOWING is Pertinent to ALL
PARTIES, but not LIMITED to
"ACTING".... "judicial Officer" (JO)
"judges,
prosecutors,
clerks of court, or any
"process servers,
or so-called "law enforcement officer," (LEO)
and or ANY other
city, county of, state of, and or
any federal officers . . .

THE 7th Amendment of the 1791 Constitution
of the United States is  . . .  →  HERE

Quoting. . .

    "In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy
shall exceed twenty dollars, 
the right of trial by jury shall be preserved,
and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined
in any Court of the United States,
than according to the rules of the common law.

  This "RIGHT" applies WITHIN ALL the states,
commonwealths, and territories of the
United States.
Gonzalez-Oyarzun v. Caribbean City Builders,
Inc., 27 F. Supp. 3d 265 -
Dist. Court, D.
Puerto Rico 2014    PDF HERE
[end of quote, Extra Emphasis Added!
Verdict by
a FEDERAL COURT JUDGE,
who is NOT as "brain dead" as a FEW of the rest.]

And IF anyone is having problems with the WORD..
"SUIT"
in the phrase "In Suits at common law,"
we will PROVIDE A LEGAL Definition
from 
→  HERE
 [Quoting, in part ... see "Fair Use LAW...]

"Suit is a generic term, of comprehensive
signification,
and applies to any proceeding in a
court of justice
in which the plaintiff pursues,
in such court,
the remedy which the law affords him
for the redress of an Injury
or the recovery of a right It is,
however,
seldom applied to a criminal prosecution.
"
[end of quoted, and IF you can READ,
than that means there are
ONLY 2 (TWO)
Different TYPES of "cases, or actions"

EITHER
1.
"CIVIL" or
2. "CRIMINAL"

and any and all of those who repeat,
or try to convince you other-than-wise
that WHATEVER case,
and or action is
NOT
EITHER "CIVIL OR CRIMINAL,
they need a
"frontal lobotomy reversal."
and,
do NOT HAVE A CLUE what they are
"talking about"
And that includes to anyone with,
(or without,)
a LAW DEGREE.

FACTS...
SUITS 1. applies to any proceeding
in a court of justice
in which the plaintiff pursues,
(and that INCLUDES ANY PLAINTIFF,
anyone who STARTS an "action," including US,
"We the People,"
and or any of them, they be
"called" judges, prosecutors,
OR "WHO THE FLIP" OTHERS,
except
  2. . . "however, seldom applied to a
criminal prosecution."

You might ask, what is the differance of a
"court of justice,"
and a "court without justice?"

Answer:
Courts of Justice have Jury Trials, (Trials by Jury,)
and
"courts without justice"
do NOT have "Jury Trials,"
(Trials by Jury,)
to
have a LAWFull Verdict.

And IF they happen to send you,
or anyone that you know to JAIL,
even for
"Contempt of Court,"
OR "NO SHOW,"
both are
"Criminal Actions,"
and DEMANED the REQUITED
"Trial By JURY",
(a Jury Trial,)
BEFORE
ANY INCARSERATION!"
STUDY the above Federal CASE LAW AGAIN!

   So are you really, truthfully,
without any DURESS,
(equales THREATEND, or Harassment)
and or by Confinement or any FINE?
Yes or NO?
And were you really "LAW-FULLY"

required to "appear" in their
"ILLEGAL administrative"
tribunal function
, with "NO TRIAL BY JURY,"
FALSE, FAKE, pretend-a-court function,
even if you did sign some "ticket,"
or had a summons,
or any "warrant?"
REALLY?  
THE ....... Answers ARE NO

BUT. . .
BEFORE the "quazi-court date,
or any "NO Show,"

SEE and DO an

"Affidavit Of Corporate Denial" below ****.

And the Legal meaning of "OUT OR COURT"
is found
HERE 

[AND. . . QUOTING. . . ]
OUT OF COURT
. . .
He who has no legal statue in court is said
to be “out of court.”

[end of quote, AND That the FACTS of this SITE,
So YOU CAN NOTIFY ALL PARTIES of any "action,"
that if. . .
ANYONE  "has NO legal statute,"
"RATIFIED BY WE the PEOPLE,"

as in 3/4 Three Quaters
of all the states,") than they are ALL
. . .
"OUT OF COURT,"
and NOT a "LEGAL ACTION, under any CASE of
ANY LAW. AND TOTALLY WITHOUT Subject Matter or
PERSONAL JURISDICTION,
what-so-ever!
NOR any "standing,"
NOR any "AUTHORITY to Proceed,"
in ANY ACTION, without OUR
ON the RECORD, CONCENT!

[AND. . . QUOTING. . . ]

    "The text of the Amendment itself
states as much:
the right to a civil jury trial was
"preserved,"
not created
."
U.S. CONST. amend. VII;
see also Baltimore & Carolina Line v. Redman,
295
U.S. 654, 657, 55 S.Ct. 890, 79 L.Ed. 1636 (1935)
("[The] right of trial by jury thus preserved
is the right which existed under the English
common law when the Amendment was adopted.")

(End of Quoted Case LAW → 
HERE

DID you happen to see the words "RIGHT of a TRIAL BY JURY...
*** . . . thus preserved. . .!***

[AND. . . Again....QUOTING. . . ]

    "Nonetheless, one of "the best examples" of the
"clauses of the Constitution which guarantee[s]
and safeguard[s] the fundamental rights
and liberties of the individual [is]
the Seventh Amendment,
which guarantee[s] the right of trial by jury."

Continental Ill. Nat'l Bank &
Trust Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island
& Pacific Ry. Co., 275*275 294 U.S. 648, 669, 55 S.Ct.
595, 79 L.Ed. 1110 (1935).
HERE

  "[T]he Bill of Rights codified venerable,
widely understood liberties."

District of Columbia
v. Heller,
554
U.S. 570, 605, 128 S.Ct. 2783,
171 L.Ed.2d 637 (2008).

The discussion of the civil jury trial's
importance in American history elucidates
its paramount importance.
The basic right to a civil jury trial
is a fundamental liberty interest.

(end of quoted LAW Emphasis Added for FOCUS, Only!)

DID YOU ALL SEE the Simple Words in that 2008 Fed. Case? . . .

"The basic right to a civil jury trial
is a fundamental liberty interest.
"

NOW TO GET RID OF THE LIES the FLAGRANT
IGNOR-ANTS OF THE
7th. Amendment ....
conjured up out of their
fictional pretended Quasi "law" schools.

NEXT: [COPIED and PASTED,
and NEVER has
been
"over-ruled," nor "overturned,"
nor "set aside,"
by any real "JUDICAL COURT"
as in quoting . . . from 
HERE]

The Justices v. Murray
76 U.S. (9 Wall.) 274

Syllabus

1. The provision in the Seventh Amendment
of the Constitution of the United States which
declares
that no fact tried by a jury shall be otherwise
reexamined
in any court of the United States
than according to the rules
of the common law applies to the facts tried
by a jury in a cause in a state court.

2. So much of the 5th section of the Act of
Congress of
March 3, 1863, entitled

    "An act relating to habeas corpus and
regulating proceedings in certain cases

as provides for the removal of a judgment
in a state court,
and in which the cause
was tried by a jury
,
to the circuit court of the United States
for a retrial on the facts
and law is not in pursuance of the Constitution,
and is void.

  "If any suit or prosecution,
civil
or criminal,
has been or shall be commenced in any
state court,. . . ."

[end of quote.]

   WHAT did that say...... OH YEA.....
". . .
 than according to the
rules of the common law applies to the facts
tried by a jury
in a cause in a state court."
[end of quote.]

  AND THAT SAID AGAIN (like restating the same
FACTS of EVIDENCE. . .  and LOOK REAL CLOSE
to see the words. . . )

  "If any suit or prosecution,
civil or criminal,
has been or shall be commenced in
any state court,. . .
[end of quote.]

   Please.....ALLOW a NON-Bar-Carder to
show you the. . . TRUTH...

1. ". . .  than according to the rules of the
common law applies to the facts
tried by a jury in a cause in a state court."

Those WORDS should convey to any mentally
NON-Devolved
being as a meaning...
2.
"rules of the c-o-m-m-o-n law applies
to the facts tried by a jury
in a cause in a state court
,"
as the location of a
"CIVIL STATE COURT,"
and that the
"TRIAL BY JURY" . . .
"STARTED,"
IN a
"STATE COURT," that the
3.
"TRIAL BY JURY" was "CIVIL" in that
"State COURT,"

before it was
"reexamined."
BY a "CONSTITUTIONAL 7th. Amendment COURT!

OH. . . that applies, unless it is NOT A REAL, as in a
"Positive Law Statute"
"STATE COURT OF LAW?" Right!

   AND the WORD in that above
"
CASE LAW" (CASE L-A-W)
that stated, look real close this time .....

"
regulating proceedings
in certain cases
," as provides for the
removal of a judgment in a state court
,
and in which the cause was tried by a jury,"
Now we know that the so-called
"subject matter"
was at the beginning of the sentence
"habeas corpus," [means produce the body,]
but the fact of the matter is the statements
were made TWICE that. . .
". . .  than according to the rules of the
common law
applies to the facts tried by a jury
in a cause in a state court."

and that was, and is a

"civil case," and
is also "at common LAW."

    OR are the "bar-carders" referring to only to their
"PRIVATE CORPORATE"
ADMINISTRATIVE
NON-CONSTITUTIONAL
cases, in a
NON "state court civil jury trial cases," (?)
NOT having "jury trials?"
OH...That must be what the nay-sayers are referring to, HUH? 

ANSWER: Believe it or NOT;
They don't have a CLUE!

Corporate Law attempting to over take,
and CON-Troll

"common law jury trial, in civil actions."
And as a great surprise, they are partly right,
EXCEPT if ANY PARTY,
on either side
"DEMANDS A JURY TRIAL,"
in any "State,"
OR any "Federal Courts," than
THEY SHOULD GET A

"JURY TRIAL" AS A GUARANTEE,

by any, and ALL (A-L-L) who have taken, any,

"Oath of OFFICE, to "Defend /
or UPHOLD"
within the United States of America
and within the United States Constitution
as follows . .

[Quoting, as in copied and pasted . . . SEE
"OATH OF OFFICE"
→  HERE ]
28 U.S.C. Sec 453- Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
Oaths of justices and judges. . . .
Each justice or judge of the United States shall take the
following oath or affirmation before performing the
duties of his office:
“I, ______________, do solemnly swear
(or affirm) that
I will administer justice without
respect to persons,
and do equal right to the poor
and to the rich,
and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge
and perform all the duties incumbent
upon me as _________________
under the Constitution and laws of the United States.
So help me God.”

[end of quote. and ALL, or anyone who is an "officer"
of ANY Judicial, and or
"Judicial" Procedure, Action
IS REQUIRED
to, under THAT
"POSITIVE LAW STATUTE,"
to give their "OATH" to ALL THEM THERE WORDS,
also be "BONDED," (as in "INSURED,") And
these Pretend-a-courts, are NOT real "Judges"
of any
"JUDICIAL PROCEDURE,"
EVERYWHERE IN THIS COUNTRY!]

IF they  VIOLATE their Sworn  OATH OF OFFICE
SO . . .
WARNING TO ALL the "Actors,"
or whoever, that are pretending to be...
UNDER the

NON-Enacted, NON-Codified, NON-Positive,
NON-Law, that they are
"fraudulently"
charging FINES,
and Jail Time,
AND extorting support payments,
and court fees, etc., etc., etc.,"
which is based on. . .

Title 42; OR Title 21 ; OR Title 47 U.S.C.,
then YOU / "THEY"
are conversely under the FOLLOWING. . .
since you, and some of "THEY"
can see the WORDS . . .
again stating . . .

"Each justice, or judge of the United States
shall take the following oath or affirmation
before performing the duties of his office:"

and if the "THEY" be under any
NON "POSITIVE LAW,"
U.S.C,
then the

"THEY" be UNDER ALL THE US CODES,
including the
"Oath of Office," ALSO.

THAT SAID. . .
"Each justice or judge of the United States"
and was their action started / filed
WITHIN THE UNITED STATES"
Yes or NO?

(Answer is "YES" it was!)
than WE WILL HAVE A "TRIAL BY JURY,"
or NO LAW-FULL ACTION is to continue.

AND, in case you, or the "THEY" missed it, . . .
"THE PREAMBLE OF
THE
United States Constitution IS
IN
THE CONSTITUTION,
and the
"BILL OF RIGHTS,"
are WITH-IN
the Constitution of the United States,"
and YOU ALL are also INSIDE
THAT CONTRACT, that STATES. . .

    ". . .under the Constitution and laws of the UNITED STATES

So help me God.”
[end of quote.] 

Just a couple of "educated" guesses....

1. Maybe their "god," God, or GOD, just is not "helping" them? Huh! ....

And OR. . .
2.
They are just "mouthing" the words, and NOT meaning ANY OF THEM!

And OR . . .
3.
or they DO NOT "understand" the English words,
THEY SPOKE,

and SIGNED, in front of EYE WITTINESS!

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will . . . .
faithfully and impartially discharge and perform
all the duties incumbent upon me as _________________
under the Constitution and laws of the United States"
[END OF WHAT WAS
"SWORN" AS AN "OATH. . .
UNDER THE CONSTITUTION and LAWS,"
of the United States,"
[not the NON LAWS made up for profit only,]

And IF they DO NOT FILL_FULLY that
"OATH," of that
"SIGNED CONTRACT"

they should  . . .

1. "GO TO PRISON" for "LYING UNDER AN "OATH,"
That is Prejury!
Also Equals PRE-JURY!

and ALSO . . .

2. "PAY BACK to ANY and ALL their VICTIMS OF "THEIR PERSONAL
FRAUD,"
in TRIPPLE DAMAGES,

and ALSO . . .
3. There Lack of "Specified  PERFORMANCE,"
of All ITEMS of said "CONTRACT" and at LEAST
20 OTHER FEDERAL FELONIES that

"We the People," can ADD to "THEIR"
Personal
FEDERAL CRIMINAL Complaints,
and after them, thanCIVIL Complaints
AND ALL IN A FEDERAL COURT!

And that was NOT a "threat,"
that is a Promise,
via the protection of a "Positive LAW,"
found at
Title 18 Sec. 1512 
  HERE

[and QUOTING, in part,
as in copy and pasted a common law ... law. . . ]

  ". . . OCGA §16-10-1 provides:
“Any public officer who willfully and intentionally violates
the terms of his oath as prescribed by law shall,
upon conviction thereof, be punished by imprisonment
for not less than one nor more than five years.”
(Emphasis supplied.)

[
end of quote. and "ANY" means "ALL" of them there
"public officers,"
get
"IMPRISONMENT,"
and I'd vote for ....
a Without PAROLE
for the whole
"FIVE (5) YEARS!!"

And THE LAW to have a
"TRIAL BY JURY"
is IN, as INSIDE, ALL the State's Constitution,
and the US Constitution,
so NO ONE has a "free form dumb pass"
on that fact, either. Making an "OATH"
to do something, with hand or on a bible, means
no more than to them, PERPS,
than lying about most everything else,
that their "dirty little" hand(s) touch,
or their LYING mouths state,
FROM the "OATH" onward.

    COMMON LAW "CIVIL CASES" read
(for the "pretend-a-judges,"
and the "pretend-a-prosecutors,")
and all the REST or the "pretended
law enforcement officers,
are "OPERATING OUTSIDE ANY REAL LAW,"
which makes them ALL...
a
"RICO Gang'"
And instead of wasting time, and money
trying to INSTRUCT them in
"REAL LIFE JURY TRIALS." PDF → HERE

Then You USE.... Title 18 U.S.C 241 and 242
Duh THEY Shall be CHARGED by FEDERAL CRIMINAL CHARGES.

Not a patty cake, patty cake "civil suit FIRST, a "Criminal Action FIRST"

Hey WARNING all you pretend-dah-judges...
Oh, yes,
you can attempt to persuade "others" with a LIE,
but that is NOT GOING TO
HAPPEN IN THIS IMMEDIATE CASE ACTION!

See the ABOVE DISCLAIMER →  HERE

FACT: 1
IF . . .you Did NOT or can NOT RECEIVE A

"JURY TRIAL,"
TO DECIDE THE OUTCOME
/ VERDICT OF THE "DISPUTE," IN ANY ACTION,
THAN FACT . . . .

"IT IS NOT A "R-E-A-L C-O-U-R-T!"
(REALLY, it is NOT a "REAL COURT,
it is a
"FALSE,
FAKE,"
Pretend-a-judicial something,
(that I can't state here!)

FACT: 2
And the "PRETENDERS" are NOT
"Constitutional,"
NOR
"LAWFUL,"
in any aspect,
including their violating their sworn

"
OATHS OF OFFICE."
to UPHOLD and Defend
the Constitution of the
United States."
Which makes them, NOT only
"voluntary LIARS commiting Prejury"

but actual CRIMINAL terrorists, who are
"declaring war against the LAW(S)
of this COUNTRY,"
which is
"TREASON!"

Hey "actors,"
Would you LIKE to bet your LIFE(S),
that WE can't CONVINCE a Federal "Jury"
of that FACTS HERE?
HUH?

SO OPPS....
"IT" Looks LIKE a court?
and
it may even SMELLS
like a court,
but OOOOH I'm sure happy I did NOT to STEP IN IT!"

It is LIKE you "pretenders" should drop
any and ALL "Illegal" action(s),
and wipe OUR files Sparkling CLEAN,
as in "Expungment,"
(l@@k that up in a "L-A-W Dictionary,)
and I'll DROP the Federal, and State CRIMINAL
CHARGES, and there exists
NO other options.

NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES . . .

   Anything can be "copied" from this site,
BUT . . . any LINK, or referenced URL,
connected to the internet, has to have the
URL / Web Address attached, affixed,
pointing to the LINKS provided this information,
for legal educational reference, and,
to satisfy all "Copy Write and "Fair USE"
Positive LAWS, in "OUR country."
Find them in "Positive LAW"
Title 17 U.S.C
HERE
Sec. 102 and 105 (among others.)

    FACT 3:
  
ALL (A-L-L,) "INFERIOR COURTS"
ARE
100%"SUBJECT," and OR ARE
"UNDER THE COMPLETE CONTROL"
OF
THE "UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT'S"
DECISIONS, / VERDICTS,
and MUST / SHALL COMPLY
TO THE US SUPREME COURT DECISIONS
/ VERDICTS,

as their, the "LOWER COURTS"
rulings or "their"
deciding" factors, of ALL decisions,
of any
"INFERIOR courts,"
(yes, ALL of them,) are directly
UNDER
CASE "LAW" RULINGS.
(LOOK UP the words
"CASE LAW RULINGS,"

and than

"Abide BY THEM
["Abide" means "OBEY THEM."]

NOW: THE FOLLOWING REASON-ABLE
LAWFULL FACTS OF TRUTH AS IN
"REAL CASE L-A-W"

ARE AS FOLLOWS . . .

Agency Holding v. Malley-Duff, 483 U.S. 143 (1987)  →  HERE

[QUOTING Case Law "Ruling"
from the 
United States "SUPREME" Court . . ]

   "Unlike 1983, however, we believe that it is
a federal statute that offers the closest analogy
to civil RICO. The Clayton Act, 38 Stat. 731,
as amended, 15 U.S.C.  § 15, offers a far closer
analogy to RICO
than any state law alternative
.
Even a cursory comparison of the two statutes reveals
that
the civil action provision of RICO was patterned after the Clayton Act.

The Clayton Act provides:
    "Any person who shall be injured in his business
or property
by reason of anything
forbidden in the antitrust laws
may sue therefor in any district court of the United States . . .
and shall recover threefold the damages
by him sustained,
and the cost of suit including

a reasonable attorney's fee."
[end of quote.]

15 U.S.C. § 15(a)

(and quoting. . . )
RICO's civil enforcement provision provides:

    "Any person injured in his business
or property by reason of a violation of section
1962 of this chapter may sue therefor in any
appropriate United States district court
and shall recover threefold the damages
he sustains and the cost of the suit, including a
reasonable attorney's fee."
[end of quote.]

Did you SEE the words....
"May sue therefor in any
appropriate United States district court"

18 U.S.C. § 1964(c)

(and quoting. . . )

   "Both RICO and the Clayton Act are designed to
remedy economic injury by providing for the
recovery of treble damages, costs, and attorney's fees.
Both statutes bring to bear the pressure of
"private attorneys general"
on a serious national problem for which
public prosecutorial resources are deemed inadequate;
the mechanism chosen to reach the objective in both
the Clayton Act and RICO is the carrot
of treble damages.
Moreover, both statutes aim to
compensate
the same type of injury;
each requires that a plaintiff
show injury "in his business or property
by reason of" a violation
."

[end of quote.]

[QUOTING . . . ]

Rotella v. Wood - 528 U.S. 549 (2000) HERE

    "In rejecting a significantly different focus under RICO,
therefore, we are honoring an
analogy that Congress itself accepted
and relied upon,
and one that promotes the objectives of civil RICO
as readily as it furthers the
objects of the Clayton Act.
Both statutes share a common congressional
objective of encouraging
civil litigation to supplement Government
efforts to deter
and penalize the respectively
prohibited practices
.
The object of civil RICO is thus
not merely
to compensate victims
but to turn them into prosecutors,
"private attorneys general,"
dedicated to
eliminating racketeering activity
.
Id.,at 187"

(citing Malley-Duff, 483 U. S., at 151 HERE 

"but to turn YOU into prosecutors,"

(civil RICO specifically has a "further purpose [of]
encouraging potential private plaintiffs
diligently to investigate").
The provision for treble damages
is accordingly justified by the
expected benefit of
suppressing racketeering activity,
an object pursued the sooner the better."

    ". . . Rule 11(b)(3), allowing pleadings
based on evidence reasonably anticipated
after further investigation
or discovery
.

See, e. g., Corleyv. Rosewood Care Center, Inc.
of Peoria,
142 F.3d 1041, 1050-1051 (CA71998)
(relaxing particularity requirements of Rule 9(b)
where RICO plaintiff lacks access to all facts
necessary to detail claim).
It is not that we mean to reject Rotella's
concern about allowing
"blameless ignorance"
to defeat a claim . . "

Urie
v. Thompson,337 U. S. 163, 170 (1949)
 HERE . . ."

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.
It is so ordered.
[end of quote.]

Did you all actually "SEE" the WORDS......
"It is so ordered?"

LOOKS like a
"Court O-R-D-E-R,"
to anyone with their IQ
above their SHOE SIZE,
which should know a Legal term called

"Stare Decisis"
meaning

"A judge is bound to follow precedent of earlier decisions."

And the word "PRECEDENT" means as a
Stated "RULE," a "to be followed,"
and "abide by the VERDICTS."
and NOT make up
"your own"
"get rich" quicker "pretend-a-verdicts,
in YOUR UN-LAW-FOOL
pretend-a-fake judicial
THING!

HEY "judges"
do we need to provide you also
with the DEFINITION of the word

"BOUND,"
OK... HeRE. . . That means

1. to adhere to.
2. to abide by.

OR, your only 2. choices,
or would you RATHER choose the experience
of being
"bound" as in
"incarceration?" as our Choice No. 3.
??

    Those WORDS are a
"a demand, or a command,"
which equals the word,

"ORDER
."
  OF ALL
US
SUPREME
COURT

DECISIONS

SO
"ORDERED" to ALL of the
"Inferior
pretend-a-article-3-judical-quasi-courts"

WHo are ALL
BELOW the
US SUPREME COURT
,
to faith-fully
abide,
OBEY,
and AGREE be controlled
TOTALLY
by THEIR decisions
on ALL
 of the same
"SUBJECT MATTER." 

The word "RULING," as in
"Case L-A-W"
means it is to

"RULE" (R-U-L-E,) the
"LOWER / INFERIOR courts

in this country,
as a
"STANDARD," and or, as a
GUIDE to what all courts
"VERDICTS," Judgdments, Decisions,
Orders,
ETC: ETC: ETC:

are to actually RULE ABIDE BY the

THEIR FINAL VERDICT Which EQUALS
the "Verdicts" by the
S-U-P-R-E-M-E COURT.

AND ...
ALL You who pretend to be "judges" and that includes anyone
BELOW the United States Supreme Court,
are "ACTING" as ANY court,
in ANY cities, counties, state, district, any State of Appeals, or any
Federal Criminal, or Civil, Justice of the Peace COURT, or
Municipal COURTS, or any other "court" between them to the
United States SUPREME COURT!

FACT... IF IT IS Named or CALLED a COURT, it is to ABIDE by the
United States SUPREME COURT RULINGS / VERDICTS / ORDERS!

AGAIN. . .
"Stare Decisis"
meaning
. . .
A judge is bound to follow precedent of earlier decisions."
And this was provided in
common English,

that did NOT mean
NOT abiding by "some traffic," grass,

parking ticket, nor Juvenile, or
Family, 
or WHAT THE FLIP OTHER NAME
(and any OTHER quasi-court,
UNTIL we get you
into the
United States
SUPREME
COURT
ON YOUR DIME
and on YOUR JAIL TIME!

Another EXAMPLE would be....
The Head CEO states

. . . "IT IS SO ORDERED!"

and EVERYONE below the HEAD CEO
do what was
"ORDERED!"
Which would be like....
the United States SUPREME Court

stating. . .
"IT IS SO ORDERED!"

    AND .... That is NOT an . . .
"if you feel like it, or don't feel like following THEIR

"DECISIONS,"
it is an . . .
"O-R-D-E-R" to do so,
by THE
"S-U-P-R-E-M-E" "RULER" AGENT,
HEAD CEO of the
"JUDICIAL SYSTEM!"
AND ....
NOT
 
if your so-called
"inferior judge,"
of any
so-called "justice of the peace court,"
nor any "municipal court,"
nor so-called

nor any "family court,"
nor any "juvinal court,"
nor any "county court,"
nor any "district court,"
nor any "appeals court,
nor state supreme court,"
nor any "tax court,"

nor any "FEDERAL Court,
nor ANY OTHER Quasi- COURT,
OR... Tax Court
nor whatever the "IMPOSTERS" /
IMPERSONATORS
think to do or call themselves,
"other-than-wise" as.
So for a "reiteration". . .
The United States 
S-U-P-R-E-M-E
Court SAID IT,
SO
"JUST DO IT!"

IT IS SO
"ORDERED!"

    NO other CHOICE! "JUST DO IT,"
and EXACTLY THAT WAY,
or SUFFER AT YOUR OWN PERIL,
danger, risk, demise, "job loss,"
down fall ETC, and with

"TRIPLE DAMAGE$,"

at that, and
"PRISON TIME!"
(WOOPY! Who-rah! I'd vote for all that!)

The "LAW-LESS INFERIOR"
(means with-out a LAW,)
or any of the pretended
"courts" want YOU to "OBEY"
"their"pretended-court
"orders," but without an actual
"REAL LAW"
(example Title 42 U.S.C or Title 42 C.F.R
AND.... Title 47 U.S.C and 20 PLUS MORE....)

since these
"NON JURY TRAIL" quasi-courts do
NOT
need to follow, (obey or adhere to.)
"THEIR" SUPREME COURT RULINGS
(Head CEO's)
"ORDERS."
BUT as in "hind-end sight," they want "YOU"
to OBEY their "law-less odors, (lol,)
and NON Jury Trail verdicts."

That is just a "double standard" to state the LEAST.  

    Remember: an UN-Constitutional "order"
does NOT
have to be
"obeyed,"
as neither does any

UN-Constitutional
ILLEGAL NON-LAW(S).

NOW one of my most favor- right,
actual, factual
US. SUPREME COURT Case

"LAW VERDICTS"
is as follows . . . .

[QUOTING From a real SUPREME Court
Article 3 Bill of RIGHTS JUDGE 
HERE . . . . ]

Mr. Justice Field delivered the opinion of the court.

"An unconstitutional act is not a law;
it confers no rights; it imposes no duties;
it affords no protection; it creates no office; it is,
in legal contemplation, as inoperative
as though it had never been passed."
[end of quote.] 

United States Supreme Court:
NORTON v. SHELBY COUNTY(1886) No. 264

    NOTICE: That "VERDICT," or
"Case L-A-W"

has never been overruled,
nor overturned,
nor set aside,
so it still
STANDS TODAY,
as an
"O-R-D-E-R," to ALL
so-called "INFERIOR" courts."

LET US, and all the
"skimmers and grinners,"
RE-View that
"Case L-A-W". . . .
that pertains directly to
ALL other PRETENDED "DECISIONS,
or "fake orders," in ALL them "LOWER" courts,
that have
"NO CLUE" on any of
"subject matter of this site!" 

Which are "VOID," and "UNCONSTITUTIONAL"
when used
"against we the people."

1. "An unconstitutional act is not a law. . .
that really means it is

"NOT a L-A-W!"

2. "it confers no rights;" (on ANY so-called
"law enforcement,
nor "NON-TRIAL-Quasi-courts-judges-prosicutors ETC.)

3. "it imposes no duties;" (on US, "We the People."
to abide by, NOR "obey, NOR be "judged by.")

4. "it affords no protection;" (Nope, NOT One
Micro SPECK of
'Protection"
to
ANY so called any "law enforcement," nor any
"NON-TRIAL-Quasi-pretend-duh-courts.
Means ALL of them
have
"NO IMMUNITY,
ZERO, NADA, NONE!")

5. "it creates no office;" (gives "NO LAW-FULL
AUTHORITY
,"nor ANY "Jurisdiction"
over anyone
, anytime, anywhere,
in any "flipping way, shape or form!")

6. "it is, in legal contemplation, as inoperative as
though it had never been passed."

(BINGO . . .
PLUS "TRIPLE DAMAGE$
$$!")

     NOW, those 6 Parts of a "RULING"
("again R-U-L-I-N-G" means it "RULES,")....
which actually
STATES
what this site is all about, which is there exists,
"NO immunity" (see NO. 4. above,) in any
"ACTION for any reason,"

AND,
If the perps (perpetrators) could only

R-E-A-D, AND,
could understand what those WORDS
STATED
, . . . .
that one CASE, should Totally
STOPCEASE any
and ALL "LEO" (Law Enforcement Officer,)
and or ANY and ALL "JOs"
(pretended "Judicial Officers,")
and like any "clerks of court,
and ALL prosecutors,
and all
"process servers,"city, county, state,or federal,
(refer to NOs. 2., 4., 5. and 6. just above,)
and. or anyone else connected to said
(NON)
"jurisdictional" ACTORS in their OWN
FAKE
"NON-TRIAL quasi-court "TRAPS." 

And as an Example:
Title 42 U.S.C
(such as Family Courts (sick)
pretended RULES, (for PROFIT,)  that has
(as in Paste Tense,)....
Never Been

"Codified"

NOR "
ENACTED,"
NOR made into "POSITIVE LAW."

(MORE "REBUTTABLE PROOF" of
NON "POSITIVE LAW" →  
HERE )

PDF LIST of "Positive and NON positive CODES"HERE

SINCE Title 42 U.S.C HAS NEVER BEEN . . .

1. "ENACTED" NOR

2. "CODIFIED" NOR

3. "PASSED as a POSITIVE LAW,"

which is being stated Under the
"FAIR USE Positive Law
Title 17 U.S.C Sec. 102; 105, for
"Education Purposes"
only as follows. . . 

QUOTING from (in part from  . . . )

uscode.house.gov/codification/term_positive_law.htm . . .
    HERE  

"in general, the term "positive law"
connotes statutes, i.e.,

law that has been enacted by a
duly authorized legislature."

SO. . .
what is the OPPOSITE of a. . .
 

"law that has NOT been enacted by a duly authorized legislature!"

OH YES. "a NON LAW . . . that
"HAS NOT
"been enacted,"
by a
"DULY a NON-Authorized NON-Legislature,"
that is what that
"NON-Judicial,
NON-Authority granting,
NON- Subject Matter granting,
F-A-K-E
NON-"LAW,"

when it is a
"NON-Positive,"
and "NON-CODIFIED"
and NON-"PASSED
as a POSITIVE LAW,"
making it a "NON-L-A-W."
[and all the "totally illiterate"
just blink, and than say,Oh "yes it is!"]

AND...
That is a
"No Brain-er" when anyone can NOT
understand that "SIMPLE FACT."
NOT ONLY
are they legally, and law-fully UN-FIT
for ANY "Public OFFICE," they need to be
"INCARCERATED" until they PAY for their CRIME$$$.

AND Again QUOTING more
Easy to Understand FACTS . .
(fair use parts. . . )

"Positive law typically consists of enacted law—
the codes,statutes,
and regulations that are applied
and enforced in the courts.
The term derives from the medieval use of positum
(Latin "established"),
so that the phrase positive law literally means
law established by human authority."

Black's Law Dictionary 1200 (8th ed. 2004)
HERE or HERE

So what does the WORDS mean stated above
that stated. . .

"Positive law typically consists of enacted law —
the codes, statutes, and regulations
that are applied and enforced in the courts."
[end of quote.]

OH.... that means.... that... ONLY. . .
"Positive law
- are "enacted" as codes, statutes,
and or "regulations (RULES),"

are THE ONLY L-A-W-S . . .

"that are applied and enforced in the courts."

WOW!
That just made the RICO GANG

GO TILT!
Best Hide them Bar Cards, NOW!

 The REST, "NON-Positive laws"
DO NOT APPLY, AGAINST US,
nor AFFORDS
ANY "AUTHORITY,"
NOR "FORCE OF LAW,"

nor are to be used AGAINST US,
and only APPLIES to . . . THEM.

[QUOTING . . . in part. → HERE ]

 "Positive laws (Latin: ius positum)
are human-made laws
that oblige or specify an action.
It also describes the establishment of
specific rights
for an individual or group.
Etymologically, the name derives from the
verb to posit.".

DID YOU HAPPEN TO SEE THE
WORDS...

"POSITIVE LAWS". . ,
and
"It also describes the establishment of
specific rights
for an individual or group."

And with those words stated above. . .

WHAT IS THE OPPOSITE OF A
"POSITIVE LAW,"

OH YEA....
A
"NEGATIVE NON-LAW" that DOES NOT
"describe(s) the establishment of specific rights
for an individual or group."

AND IF THAT "RICO GROUP,"
such as any quasi-court are attempting to USE
"NON POSITIVE"
NON-LAWS
against us?
WOE!  CHA-CHING! $$$

 (MORE ON "POSITIVE LAW," and the
"Statutes and Codes that pertain directly
to ONLY THEM. → 
HERE! )

 THEN FOLLOWING "ACTIONS"
of "their crimes," COMES INTO EFFECT.
. .
for starting actions against ANYONE, including....
Judges, Prosicutors, their Clerks of Court,
AND
all Guardian Ad Litems,
and all Child Services,
and all Police,
and ALL Child Services....

and on, and ON and ON,
since they are all in the same
NO-LAW RICO GANG!

NOW LET US....
VIEW what these perps, (perpetrators,) get themselves into. . .

Title 18 U.S.C. Sec. 241 and 242 HERE,

(Sec. 241. in part. . . )

[QUOTING . . . . ]

Title 18 U.S.C Sec. 241 states. . . .

If two or more persons conspire to injure,
oppress,threaten,
or intimidate any person
in any State,
Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District
in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right
or privilege
secured to him by the Constitution
or laws of the United States,
or because of his having so exercised the same;  or

If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway,
or on the premises of another,
with intent to prevent
or hinder his free exercise
or enjoyment of any right
or privilege so secured-

They shall be fined under this title
or imprisoned not more than ten years,
or both;
and if death results from the acts committed
in violation of this section
or if such acts include kidnapping
or an attempt to kidnap,
aggravated sexual abuse
or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse,
or an attempt to kill,
they shall be fined under this title
or imprisoned for any term of years or for life,
or both,
or may be sentenced to death."
[end of quote. and any two or more includes,
but not limited to, any LISTED JUST ABOVE.]

   YES.... and the "they" do NOT have to
"PLAN to commit a FELONY,"

ALL they have to do is
"APPLY an UNCONSTITUTIONAL"
pretend a law,
(also known as the
"color of law,"
by any "NON-ENACTED-NON-Codified-NON-POSITIVE ACT,
also known as
"prima facie" which means....
"At first look as fact presumed to be true
unless it is disproved (as a law,)

as in

"UNCONSTITUTIONAL,"

THEN the "perps" get to enjoy
G-POP (General Population)
in a Federal Penitentiary., at 10 YEARS,
**
PER COUNT.**")  

(AND QUOTING [from →HERE ]. . .

1 USC § 204.

Codes and supplements as evidence
of the lawsof United States
and District of Columbia; citation of Codes
and supplements.

(a) United States Code

   Provided, however that whenever
titles of such Code shall have been
enacted into positive law
the text thereof
shall be legal evidence
of the laws therein contained,
in all courts of the United States,
the several states,
and the territories
and insular possessions of the United States.
[end of quote.]

SO.... that means any "NON-ENACTED"
"Statute"
"NON-Positive, NON-CODIFIED
INTO a REAL LAW,"

that
"text thereof shall," NOT
"be legal evidence....
in ALL the courts of the United States
."

   Please NOTICE the
"words pertaining directly
,
to the
"NON-POSITIVE law"
equals the legal phrase . . .
"color of law" again for as "An Example, any
Title 42 U.S.C.
"NON-POSITIVE,"

and "Non-Enacted,
NON-Lawful-Courts of the
"United States [Inc.] (see here
** )."
Funded
(FAKE, FRAUDLANT Fed Pay Offs,)
just call themselves,
"family courts," which are

" . . . such acts include kidnapping, and or
an attempt to kidnap. . ."

since that CODE
(Title 42,) that is
actually a FAKE,

"color of law," (colored to look like a law,)
pertain directly to
ONLY Federal and State employees,
and or a Federal or State Sub-Contractors,
and or their families,
ONLY. . .  unless
"we the people
CONSENT On the RECORD,"
to abide by Title 42, U.S.C.
under a "fully disclosed"
(explained.) As a LAWFUL
 4 (FOUR) element, contract, is as follows....
For a BENEFIT!

1. the "offer" is a  "fully disclosed" contract, and . .

2. parties that understand the entirety of the
contract, as in the phrase
"meeting of the minds"

3. legal subject matter, or has to be LEGAL,
see
NORTON v. SHELBY COUNTY(1886) No. 264 again. (and

4. and the "acceptance," and if the "contract'
runs more than a YEAR, it has to be writing.

     SO as ONE EXAMPLE above, or Title 42 U.S.C is
NOT "ENACTED" as "Positive LAW" to be, LEGAL,
  NOR Binding, NOR LAWFUL to gain any "subject matter"
NOR "personal jurisdiction,"
over Any
NON-Federal / or STATE
employees, and their immediate  families,
and nor Sub-Contractors,
and their immediate families, with a 4 ELEMENT CONTRACT.   

NEXT FACT: QUOTING (in part)
as in copied and pasted. . .

    "POSITIVE LAW CODIFICATION -
Office of the Law Revision Counsel

By contrast, Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare,
is a non-positive law title.
Title 42 is comprised of many individually
enacted Federal statutes--
such as the Public Health Service Act
and the Social Security Act--that have been
editorially compiled and organized into the title,
but
the title itself has not been enacted
.
[end of quote.] uscode.house.gov/codification/legislation.shtmluscode.
house.gov/codification/legislation.shtml HERE

[NEXT FACT: Quote and PDF → HERE under "Fair Use Law" (in part) . . .]

[QUOTING . . . . ]

Positive law titles

The United States Code is divided into
subject matter titles.
Some are "positive law" titles and some are
"non-positive law" titles.

The difference is this:
A positive law title of the United States Code is
- itself - a Federal statute.

A non-positive law title of the United States Code
is an editorial compilation of Federal statutes.

For example, title 10, United States Code,
"Armed Forces", is a positive law title because the title,
per se, has been explicitly enacted.

Alternatively, title 42, United States Code,
"The Public Health and Welfare", is a non-positive law title.
The Federal statutes set out editorially in title 42
have been explicitly enacted, but title 42, per se, has not.

Provisions set out in non-positive law titles
of the United States Code may vary slightly from the precise
language enacted into law; cross references
are adapted and stylistic changes are made in order
to facilitate the integration of Federal statutory provisions
into the United States Code.
By contrast, a positive law title of the United States Code
constitutes the precise statutory language enacted into law.
[end of quote.]

http://uscode.house.gov/codification/positive_law_codification.pdf HERE 

AGAIN and again, and again, until YOU and the perps can understand ...... 

[QUOTING . . . . ]

    "Alternatively, title 42, United States Code,
"The Public Health and Welfare", is a non-positive law title.
The Federal statutes set out editorially in title 42 have been explicitly enacted,
but title 42, per se, has not."

[end of quote. HERE ]

"JUDICIAL NOTICE"

SO just another FACT of "specific evidence"
that the EXAMPLE Title 42 U.S.C IS NOT
"
A NON-POSITIVE LAW TITLE!" . . .
and
"NOT EXPLICITLY ENACTED!"

.... When these "ACTORS ACT"....
"under the color of law,"
pertaining to
lawful judges, or lawful prosecutors or lawful "clerks of a
lawful court," ARE NOT, and CAN NEVER BE SUCH,
in any sense of the DEFINITIONS thereof.
AND without OUR

"FULL KNOWLEDGEABLE CONSENT,"
it is a FEDERAL FELONY /
FRAUD to pretended "jurisdiction,"
and, or any "legal or lawful complicity,"
what-so-ever, NEVER!

BESIDES. . . .

[QUOTING, as follows. . .
and try to re-read it until it you all comprehend it totally!
]

PENHALLOW v. DOANE'S ADMINISTRATORS
(Supreme Court of the United States 1795)
HERE 
    "Inasmuch as every government is an
artificial person
,
an abstraction,
and a creature of the mind only,
a government can interface only
with other artificial persons.
The imaginary, having neither actuality
nor substance,
is foreclosed from creating
and attaining parity with the tangible.
The legal manifestation of this is
that no government,
as well as any law, agency, aspect,
court, etc.
can concern itself with anything
other than corporate,
artificial persons
and the contracts between them."

[end of copied and pasted.]

That said, QUOTING in the yellow color ....

1. "Inasmuch as every government
is an artificial person
,". . .

NOW. . .
DID that BRAKE THE ICING
ON THE FAKE COURT CAKE?
And if any entity, or group of people,
whoever,
work for ANY "government" agency,
City, County or State
(all are sub-contracted to the FEDERAL)
government,
they ALL are in fact are
IN FACT
"Artificial persons,"
ALSO . . .

2.  "government can interface only with other artificial persons."  

NOW...
Doesn't that Go Against ALL YOUR "govern-mentle
school programming?

   Like "FULL TILT. . .  WOW?" HUH?

THAT "T-R-U-T-H sounds "stranger," then the FICTION
we are all were TAUGHT! HUH?  

WHY NOT JUST "ALLOW,"
(and how long should it take to JUST "allow,")
the TRUTH to SET YOU FREE!
READY... GO...
"government can interface only with other artificial persons."

SO that SAID....
GOVERNMENT IS SUPPOSED TO INTERACT WITH
ONLY OTHER GOVERNMENT entities!"

And are supposed to "judge" / adjudicate
ONLY OTHER GOVERNMENT
agents of GOVERNMENT
agencies. UNLESS one of them

"artificial" persons,
or any agents of the principal,
COMMIT A CRIME,

against of ONE OF THEIR
United States Codes,
and or
State or
Federal Regulations,
and or State Statutes.

than
"WE the PEOPLE"
can be THE PLAINTIFFS
against them in their "Jury Trial" courts!
 

WE can lawfully have
"court" over any one of "them,"
or more of their "artificial persons,"
via a
"TRIAL BY JURY" in one of "their" courts.

SO THAT IS HOW "THEIR COURTS"
SUPPOSED TO HAVE "TRIALS" FOR
(or Against.)

SO ....
ARE YOU AN
"ARTIFICIAL PERSON?"
YES OR NO! 

    IF the answer is. . . . "NO" . . .
than the "THEY" have
TO PROVE YOU
ARE AN ARTIFICAL PERSON
or they have ....

NO
"subject matter jurisdiction,"
NOR ANY "PERSONAL JURISDICTION,"
NOR ANY "JUDICIAL STANDING,"
what so flipping EVER,
over ANY of OUR, AFFAIRS, by
"any of their"
contrived CORPORATE

"NON-Positive LAWS,
Statutes, Codes, Rules or REGULATIONS,"

and duh "they" are NOT even to communicate
with you without YOUR PERMISSION.

   THEY also lied, committed
FRAUD,
Extortion
,
pretending / ACTING as REAL "courts.
But YOU ALL ARE NOT

"ARTIFICIAL PERSONS."
Some, if NOT most,
bar carders, were taught
"NOT TO READ,"
the actual words in a simple statement,
and or question.

3. AND to be more CONCLUSIVE ....
"The imaginary, having neither actuality
nor substance,
is foreclosed from creating
and attaining parity with the tangible," 

    JUDICIAL NOTICE:
WE the People, ARE
THE "TANGIBLE,"

and NOT duh they, who are the "ARTIFICIAL PERSONS."
YOU ARE STOPPED which Equals "Forclosed."
(most "bar carders"
and most are quasi-judges,
won't know what a

"Judicial Notice,"
means, just like they do
NOT know
how to have a
"LAWFUL" trial by jury"
or
what a real law-full court, is
in reality.

   THAT PERTAINS TO ANY,
NON JUDICIAL,
NON-JURY TRIAL
,
UN-CONSTITUTIONAL
"artificial persons"

Examples, just to name just FEW,
such as....
any and ALL
Family (pretended) Courts,
and Municipal (pretended) Courts,
and Justice of the Peace (pretended) Courts,
and ANY OTHER
"""NON TRIAL,""""
quasi governmental agents,
and ANY AND ALL NON-COMMON LAW,

"artificial persons,"
or "government" agencies."
City, County, State or Federal.

4. AND....QUOTING . . .
"The legal manifestation of this is that
NO government, as well as any law, agency,
aspect, court, etc.
can concern itself with anything
other than corporate,
artificial persons
and the contracts between them."

[end of quote.]

   SINCE, only the "artificial, CORPORATE,
ADMINISTRATIVE, government, artificial

FRAUDULENT COURT'S, agents, can ONLY under a

"legal manifestation of this is that NO government,
as well as any law, agency, aspect, court, etc.
can concern itself with anything other than
corporate, artificial persons
and the contracts between them."

[end of quote.]

    SO .... WE DEMAND these "artificial" courts.....

for their evidence,
ON AFFIDAVITES,

NOTORIZED,
of THEIR ABSOLUTE PROOF THAT,
"WE are NOT the Living People,
(ON THE RECORD,")

are
evidence that proves we are
"Artificial PERSONS?" 

SO, WHERE IS YOUR PROOF? 

Where is your
"Preponderance of evidence?"

  AND "IF" the "ACTORS" could READ. . .
(that be like a "heaven on earth," SITUATION.")
But they can NOT read thru "GREED stained bar cards."

   The following
US SUPREME Court Case LAW
,
pertains directly to any and
ALL
"NON-JURY,"
NON-Judicial,
NON-Courts,
and any and
ALL agencies of any city,
county or state, or federal (sounding)
named agency . . . .
Copied and Pasted, in part....]

    "Corporations are also of all grades,
and made for varied objects;
all governments are corporations,
created by usage and common consent,
or grants and charters
which create a body politic for prescribed purposes;
but whether they are private,
local or general, in their objects,
for the enjoyment of property,
or the exercise of power,
they are all governed by the same
rules of law,
as to the construction
and the obligation of the
instrument by which the
incorporation is made.

   One universal rule of law protects persons and property.
It is a fundamental principle of the
common law of England,
that the term freemen of the kingdom,
includes 'all persons,'
ecclesiastical and temporal,
incorporate, politique or natural;
it is a part of their magna charta

(2 Inst. 4), and is incorporated into our institutions.
The persons of the members of corporations
are on the same footing of protection as other persons,
and their corporate property secured by the
same laws which protect that of individuals.

2 Inst. 46-7. 'No man shall be taken,'
'no man shall be disseised,'
without due process
of law,is a principle taken from magna charta,
infused into all our state constitutions,
and is made inviolable by the federal government,
by the amendments to the constitution."
[Proprietors of Charles River Bridge v. Proprietors of,
36 U.S. 420 (1837)]

[Found
  HERE or  HERE ]

AND THE NEXT
"SUPREME COURT CASE LAW CASE"
is as follows. . . .

HALE v. HENKEL 201 U.S. 43 at 89 (1906)  HERE
[most viewers, will, and or, should re-read
the following more than twice ( or better at least 3 TIMES)
,
to re-place the
"lies" that your, [and or your quasi-teachers,
Teleyavision,]
may have lied to you, [and to them,]
about . . .
while you or they were "falsely" believing that they were
"Studying" LAW?". . . .  ]

[QUOTING verbatim . . . ]

the opinion of the court states:

     "The "individual" may stand upon "his
Constitutional Rights"
as a CITIZEN.
He is entitled to carry on his
"private" business in his own way.
"
His power to contract is unlimited."
He owes no duty to the State
or to his neighbors to divulge his business,
or to open his doors to an investigation,
so far as it may tend to incriminate him.
He owes no duty to the State,
since he receives nothing there from,
beyond the protection of his life and property.
"His rights" are such as "existed"
by the Law of the Land
(Common Law)
"long antecedent" to the organization of the State",
and can only be taken from him by

"
due process of law",
and "in accordance with the Constitution
."
"He owes nothingto the public
so long as he does not trespass
upon their rights
."
[end of quote. And I should not have to use words like
"Emphasis added,"
for anyone that actually has an IQ above their belt size.
And the word "individual" in that statement means one of
"WE the living People," un-like the same word,
with a totally different meaning used in United States Codes.]

The CASES LISTED HEREIN ARE A
"JUDICIAL WARNING"
TO
"ALL" COURT PERSONAL and Pretending "PUBLIC OFFICERS!"

Including ALL "judges," and or
ALL prosecutors, and or
ALL clerks,  and or ALL bailiffs,
and
ALL police, Health Officials,
and ETC., ETC., ETC.,  ETC,.

AND
ANY AND ALL OTHER
"NON-Positive Law"
Quasi-GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
,
Departments, State, City, County,
Township
  OR "Home Owners ASSociation!" ETC ETC

FACTS as Evidence as follows . . .  

NOT ONLY does the "Case LAW" Rules,
but ALSO the ALL the United States Codes
shall be applied within the
"States"
as in 
28 U.S.C. § 1652 -
Judiciary and Judicial Procedure § 1652.

State laws asrules of decision.

READ and STUDY!

   "The laws of the several states,
except where the Constitution

or treaties of the United States
or Acts of Congress
otherwise requireor provide,

shall be regarded as
rules of decision
in civil actions in the courts of the
United States,
in cases where they appl
y."
   
[Refer to * 28 U.S.C. § 3002 below.
(a "Positive Law." )]

[end of quote]

Yes "RICO GANG,"
"IN THE COURTS of the US,"
and that includes so-called:
traffic,
municipal,
JP,
county,
dog catcher,
family,
district,
appeals,
state supreme,
federal court,

federal appeals, and
so-called "bankruptcy,
and or any
"tax court!"
AND ANY AND ALL of
THE *FIPPING* REST OF THEIR,
NON TRAIL,
NON JUDICIAL,
UN LAW-FOOL,
NON-COURTS,
PRETENDING TO BE...
SOMETHING THEY ARE NOT !     

FACT: IF it has the word
"COURT" in IT'S TITLE,
than ALL of the

"BILL OR RIGHTS,"
and ALL the U.S.C,
the Federal and STATE,
Rules of Criminal
and CIVIL PROCEDURE,
and is FOUND in
ALL STATES
and FEDERAL
CONSTITUTIONS
pertain

DIRECTLY to "ALL" OF THEM

  That pertains DIRECTLY to ANY
"court
"
anywhere IN THE UNITED STATES
.
Unless they provide an

"Signed and Notorized
Demand for an AFFIDAVIT of FACT,
that they are NOT a "Corporate,
nor an Incorporated" entity,"
And they are Applying only
"Positive, Enacted, and Codified LAW!"
Signed Under the Pains and Penalty,
and under "Full Liability"
[not lie-ability,]
and provide evidance, they have.
that WE are
ARTIFICAL Persons, to gain,
"subject matter jurisdiction," and
"personal jurisdiction,"
co-signed by all judges,
all prosecutors, and all clerk of court's, etc., etc.,
in said action, in and by their very own hands,'
and their quasi-court
Seal
affixed to their AFFIDAVIT(S),
and NOTARIZED!

(Write one yourself, DIY ....
as in "Tweak" one of the ones
HERE )

1. and Write, or Copy in and  paste into a. . .
2.
Document following in the Affidavit,

JUDICIAL NOTICE

1. "Silence Equals Consent" by NOT responding to
"AFFIDAVIT DEMAND"
 
Warn them  iif they try to IGNOR any
"Demand for Affidavit"
becomes lawful,
legal evidance of FACTS in a
"Jury by Trial"!

2. IT automatically becomes
"Evidence of their
CORPORATE
,Administrative, NON Judicial Status,"
and will be used in one of
THEIR CORPORATE
Superior COURTS
under an
"Grand Jury INDICTMENT
,"
and or a Federal
"TRIAL BY JURY."

3. And tell them that they are all invited
to the I
NTERNATIONAL COURT . . .
PDF Handbook
HERE 

 MORE "POSITIVE LAW" as follows.....
For
 "Impersonating" ANY officer
of the United States

(Federal, and or State
(any and ALL inferior courts,)
is a federal felony violation of

 18 U.S.C. 912.  

[QUOTING . . . . ]

    "Whoever falsely assumes or pretends to
be an officer or employee acting
under the authority
of the United States
or any department,
agency or officer thereof,
and acts as such
,
or in such pretended character demands
or obtains any money, paper, document,
or thing of value,
shall be fined under this title
or imprisoned not more than three years,
or both."

[end of quote. and than sure sounds like a
"SOLID promise."]

   Aiding and abetting such impersonation
is a felony violation of 
18 U.S.C. 3 .
as an "accessory after (before or during,) the fact." 

[QUOTING. . .]

   "Whoever, knowing that an offense against
the United States has been committed,
receives, relieves, comforts or assists
the offender in order to hinder
or prevent his apprehension,
trial or punishment,
is an accessory after the fact.

   Except as otherwise expressly
provided
by any Act of Congress,
an accessory
after the factshall be imprisoned
not more than
one-half the maximum term of imprisonment or . . .
fined not more than one-half the
maximum fine
prescribed for the punishment of
the principal, or both;
 or if the principal is punishable
by life imprisonment or death,
the accessory shall be imprisoned not more
than 15 years."

[end of quote.]

AGAIN!....
"an accessory
after the factshall be imprisoned
not more than one-half the maximum term of imprisonment or . . .
fined not more than one-half the
maximum fine
prescribed for the punishment of
the principal, or both;

When ANYONE TELLS ANYONE ELSE,
that a crime is has been committed
OR is being committed
,
and that "anyone else" is in
ANY "law enforcement,
ANY judicial,
or governmental compactly,"
and they do
NOT DO ANYTHING TO STOP

the criminals,
nor notify other "LEOs or JOs.
"IMMEDIATELY: they become. . .
the
"WHOEVER[s]" . . . .
ANY and ALL OF THEM, THEY have "
VIOLATED" the following LAW.

18 U.S.C. 4

[QUOTING . . . . ]

    Whoever,
having knowledge of the actual
commissionof a felony cognizable by a
court of the United States,
conceals and does not as soon as possible
make known the same to some
judge or other person in civil
or military authority under the United States,
shall be fined under this title
or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

[end of quote. SO "we" all ought to
"Make it known,"
asap, if we can find a R-E-A-L "judge"]

"Falsifying or concealing a material fact
that is within the jurisdiction
of any branch of the Federal government,
and is another felony violation of . . ."

18 U.S.C. 1001.

[QUOTING . . . . ]

    Except as otherwise provided in this section,
whoever,
in any matter within the jurisdiction
of the executive,
legislative,
or judicial branch of the knowingly, willfully-- ,
(a) falsifies, fact; Government of the United States
conceals,
or covers up by any trick, scheme,
or device a materialfact fact;

(1) makes any representation; materially false,
fictitious, or fraudulent statement or

(2)  or materially makes or uses any false writing
or document knowing the same to contain any  false,

(3) fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry; shall be fined
under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years."

[end of quote.]

   Transmitting false and /or fraudulent court "process,"
subpoenas, records, transcripts,
and or orders ETC., ETC., via U.S.
Mail, is in fact is mail fraud,
Includes posting in an newspaper,
or on the "internet,"
or on any search warrants,
or any arrest warrants,
or any another felony violation of

18 U.S.C. 1341

[QUOTING in part . . . ]

    Whoever,
having devised or
intending to devise
any scheme or artifice to defraud,

or for obtaining money or property
by means of false or fraudulent pretenses
,
representations . . .
for the purpose of executing such scheme
or artifice or attempting so to do,
places in any post office
or authorized depository
for mail matter, any matter or thing whatever
to be sent or delivered by the Postal Service,
or deposits or causes to be deposited
any matter

or thing whatever to be sent
or delivered by any

private or commercial interstate carrier. .
.
shall be fined under this title
or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both . . . " 

[end of quote. that also includes,
"Public Notices"
in news papers,
or uploaded,
and or posted into the internet,

which is covered by the words . .
.

"sent or delivered by any private
or commercial interstate carrier. . ."
The internet is an "interstate,"
, "carrier."]

    Moreover, "mail fraud," is also one of the
RICO "predicate acts"
itemized at
18 U.S.C. 1961 et seq.
See also 28 U.S.C. 1691 in this context.
(to name a few of the 10 more FEDERAL
CRIMINAL STATUTES
that RULE any, and ALL COURT PERSONAL
Within the BORDERS of the United States.) 

AND:

[QUOTING . . . . what most, lie repeaters call a
"conspiracy theory,"
but it is an actual, factual
POSITIVE LAW, Statute,
that states the following....
copied and pasted.... ]

*** 28 U.S.C. § 3002 14 & 15A 

Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
§ 3002. Definitions. . .

(14) " State " means any of the several States,
the District of Columbia,
the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico,
the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas,
or any territory
 or possession of the United States

(15) " United States " means--

(A) a Federal corporation;

(B) an agency, department, commission,
board, or other entity
of the United States;  or

(C) an instrumentality of the United States.
[end of quote.]

[SO let us allow "LOGIC"
(the rest can "peek past their bar cards,")

to RULE in using the "Definition" of "United States,"
with
(A) a " Federal Corporation,"
by injecting the meaning, into (B) and (C) as follows. . . .]

(B) an agency, department, commission, board,
or other entity of the "Federal corporation;" or

(C) an instrumentality of the Federal corporation."
[AND CLOSER LOGICAL LOOK WE READ. . .]

(14) " State " means . . . .
[a] " possession of the United States
[A Federal Corporation.]"

OR even better . . . .

"14) " State " means . . . .
[a] " possession of the Federal Corporation."

         SO, . . . FACT: 
There is NO REAL, DEJURE, (equals any TRUE,
REAL, ACTRUAL,)
"STATE and or FEDERAL
" government" / COURTS, Agencies, Departments, 
of and by "We the People" of the united states of America.
That includes ALL
City, County as
Sub-Contractor's of United States.
AND you do not have to believe that for it,
for that to still be a FACT.
That's the bad news!

** NO ONE ! **

The GREAT NEWS IS.....

But YOU CAN FORCE
THESE PERPS / Perpetrators
/ "ACTORS" INTO "THEIR" so-called
HIGHER COURTS, 
to have "THEM" TRIED BY
A "Trial by JURY," as a "REMEDY,"
and at "TRIPLE DAMAGE VIA A
"FEDERAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT."         

(Found HERE   or HERE (scroll down to PDF.)

AND if the OTHER "ACTORS" / "PRETENDED"
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, COURTS, etc., etc., etc.,
 DO NOT ACT UPON SAID "FILED" FED COMPLAINT, 
THEY CAN "JOIN" INTO THE CONSPIRACY

UNDER Title 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3 AND 4 HERE

 [QUOTING . . . . ]

AND BY HINDERING AN INVESTIGATION

Title 18 Sec. 1582  HERE

        Whoever,
with intent to avoid, evade,
prevent, or obstruct compliance, in whole
or in part, with any civil investigative demand
duly and properly made under the
Antitrust Civil Process Act, willfully withholds,
misrepresents, removes from any place,
conceals, covers up, destroys, mutilates,
alters, or by other means falsifies any
documentary material, answers to written
interrogatories,or oral testimony, which is the
subject of such demand;
or attempts to do so or
solicits another to do so;  or
  Whoever
corruptly, or by threats or force,
or by any threatening letter or
communication
influences,
obstructs, or impedes or
endeavors to influence,
obstruct, or impede the due and proper
administration of the law under which any
pending proceeding
is being had before any department
or agency of the United States
,
or the due and proper exercise of the power
of inquiry under which any inquiry or. . .

Shall be fined under this title,
imprisoned not more than 5 years . . ."
[end of quote.]

[QUOTING . . . . HERE]

Title 18 Sec 1506
Theft or alteration of record or process; 

Whoever feloniously steals, takes away,
alters, falsifies, or otherwise avoids any record,
writ, process, or other proceeding
,
in any court of the United States,
whereby any judgment is reversed, made void,

or does not take effect;

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned
not more than five years, or both.

[end of quote.]

 [QUOTING . . . . And here is a GREAT AFFIRMATION
for
"It is so ORDERED"
issued by the United States Supreme Court,
as in THEIR "IT IS SO ORDERED" challenge. ]

[Quoting following HERE ]

18 U.S.C. § 1509 - Obstruction of court orders

Whoever, by threats or force, willfully prevents,
obstructs, impedes, or interferes with
,
or willfully
attempts to prevent, obstruct, impede,
or interfere with, the due exercise of rights
or the performance of duties under any order,
judgment, or decree of a court of the United States
,
shall be fined under this title
or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

No injunctive or other civil relief against the conduct made criminal
by this section shall be denied on the ground that such conduct is a crime.

[end of quote. Copied and pasted....]

"Take NOTICE of this JUDICIAL WARNING:"

 This is an actual "NOTICE" that anyoneor ALL
the
Whoever(s) (which can include you,)
who READS THIS

"NOTICE,"

is being duly
"NOTIFIED," as the
"WHO-EVERS"

MENTIONED ABOVE in the

"Title 18 U.S.C." which includes,
but not limited to,)
to ANY and ALL ...
PO ("Police Officers,)
and ANY AND ALL LEOs (Law Enforcement Officers,)
and ANY and ALL JOs (Judicial Officers,
including prosecutors,
clerks, bailiffs, or transcribers etc. etc) OF THAT FACT,
AS A WARNING
AT THE BEGINNING OF THE COMPLAINT
RIGHT AFTER THE HEADING
of the Federal Criminal Complaint.

____________________________________


NOW FOR THE LINKS ON THIS PAGE!

NOTICE:

ANY OR ALL OF THE LINKED SITES, on this site,
may (or may,) NOT Agree, with any of the
"subject matter," on this site.

AND ..... 

SO With that FACT in Mind.....
"NONE of the LINKED SITES ARE
"LIABLE" NOR RESPONSABLE
FOR ANYTHING ON THIS SITE."

AND. . . We are "NOT" RESPONSIBLE
for any "DEAD" Links!
BUT YOU can kindly, Let Us Know,
and when we get time,
we will attempt to fix,
or what needs to be to updated
in any "dead" links.

THANKS!

____________________________________________

 

OUR Newest Youtube Vid about this site.  HERE 

Older NPL video on other site.  HERE

ALSO NPL video on another site.  HERE

THE SUPREME LAW LIBRARY  HERE

FAMILY Guardian  HERE

Freedom-School.com/law HERE

TheConstitution.org HERE

  Bouvier's LAW DICTIONARY HERE

Black's Law Dictionary - Free Online HERE

FACT: 

ALL Municipal, and
ALL JP /
ALL Constable,
and ALL Traffic, courts (?)
are in
"TOTAL LACK of LAWFUL
"Subject Matter Jurisdiction"
AND
"Personal Matter Jurisdiction"
to issue any "search warrants"
and or any
"arrest warrants,"

that upon conviction could end
in ANY "Jail Time"
what so ever.

LAW-FULLY . . .
NO...
THEY CAN NOT JAIL ANYONE
WITHOUT A "TRIAL BY JURY!"
FACT: They, which are ALL mentioned,
after the FACT:,
are
ALL ONLY

"Class C Misdemeanors"

1.  "FINE ONLY,"

2.  NO "jail time,"

3.  NO "Confinement,"  

but . . . YOU can "CONSENT"
to their  UN-LAW-FULL,
NON-JURY-TRIAL verdicts.

Vidoes FOUND AT Youtube (.)

 Municipal Courts have NO Jurisdiction 1   HERE

OR

Municipal Courts have NO Jurisdiction 2   HERE

 

_________________________________________


HELP US HELP OTHERS 

by "DONATING"

 Donate HERE

Help US HELP OTHERS

And or

BY BECOMING A MONTHLY MEMBER

Tap the PIC BELOW.

DONATE Here

 AND: To "Sign up" for that Excellent
DONATION SERVICE IS:

BuyMeCoffee.com  →  HERE

AND

Hey!
You ALL..
who want to "donate" to help others

Just text . . . (202) 858-1233

and USE shortcode of. . . . Giv911&THX

And . . .

SECURE: CONTACT US    HERE

OR  →  Email Contact


AND for EXTRA Correct-U-lar Activity

As YOU as a **VOLUNTEER**
To Support Others, and learn LAW to DIY

Volunteer To Help

We use Telegram So Leave a PH#

AND....

SHARE On TELEGRAM

HERE

Telegram SHARE

Telegram SHAREGet Telegram HERE
______________

 

TO "HELP" PROMOTE and GROW THIS
SITE FOR FREETHE FOLLOWING SITES
are "SUBMIT SITES"SO "ADD YOUR SITE" from the

"CLICK ON the TEXT LINKS!" 

 Active Search Rresults

EXACTSEEK  

 FREE WEB MONITORING


MORE INFO TO COME
INCLUDING DOCS / PDFs

  

__________________________________________

 

AGAIN....

NOTICE:

ON ALL EXTERNAL LINKS . . . .

"ANY "LINKED" SITES, above may or may

NOT agree with SOME, or ALL

of the "Subject Matter" contained herein,

and are only provided as "EDUCATIONAL

REFERENCE MATERIAL," FOR "RESEARCH,"

and totally HERE under the "FARE USE POSITIVE LAW,"

Title 17 USC Sec 102 and 105

and under the "First Amendment"
of the united states Constitution,
called the "Freedom of Speech."

 

 __________________________________________

 

** THIS IS "THE DISCLAIMER" at the END of this

Web Page:

SO YOU DON'T WASTE "OUR" TIME. . .

WE ARE NOT LEGALLY, nor MORALLY

RESPONSIBLE

FOR ANYTHING YOU DO,

AND, OR, DO NOT DO, 

IF YOU DO IT INCORRECTLY, OR

YOU DO IT WITH THE WRONG ATTITUDE.  

[The "attitude" is a BIG part is about if you
"believe" in
 what you are using, or not,
or if it works or does not work.]

FACT 1: 

If YOU DO NOT "REALLY" BELIEVE IN

WHAT YOU ARE USING WILL WORK, 

OR EVEN .....

"IT WILL WORK," equals
"The ONLY WORKING ATTITUDE"

BUT. . .

IF YOUR ATTITUDE / Belief is....
"it maybe should work?,"

OR  . . . 

"has it worked before???????"

OR 

"How do you know if it works NOW?????"

than

"THAT IS YOUR FAULT,"
and REALLY has NOTHING TO DO
WITH THE MATERIAL,
NOR the Process.

FACT 2.

BE-LIVE IT OR NOT..... 

IF YOU DO NOT BELIEVE SOMETHING
WILL WORK.... 
MORE THAN LIKELY, IT WILL NOT WORK!

SO . . .

YOU SHOULD DO THE "ATTITUDE Adjustments"

BEFORE YOU 

1.  BEGIN any process, adjust your  "feelings"
before you file, and

BEFORE .... 

2. YOU START THROWING BLAME, on any
"anyone else anywhere!"

THANKS!

(^ Back to the TOP ^)