LAW.INFO (or .US)
READ the "DISCLAIMER": at END of this Page. BEFORE you Proceed. → HERE.
FIRST. . . this ENTIRE site, (means all of it,) and
everything on it, is under a "Positive Law," Title 17 U.S.C Sec.
102: and 105, and under the "Bill of RIGHTS," as the 1st (FIRST) Amendment of the united states
Constitution, for "Education" and Comment."
AND, Secondly . . . .
WE ARE NOT "PRACTICING" LAW BECAUSE WE KNOW AND LIVE, THE "LAW OF COMMON LOGIC," AND OR "COMMON SENSE." And WE DO NOT NEED TO
"PRACTICE," NOR WILL WE NEED TO ASK FOR A LIE-Sense to DEFEND OUR RIGHTS AS "FREE LIVING BEINGS."
And WE are NOT some
"CORPORATE FICTION(S)," NOR "Agent(s)," Employee(s),
"Sub-Contractor(s), for any "City, County, State, NOR Federal "CHARTERED" COMPANY QUASI- Court(s), IMPERSONATING
AND Masquerading (Mask-a-Raiding,) as any "JUDICIAL Tribunal /
NOR ARE WE TO BE "CONTRACTED" (or placed under ANY
"NON" FULLY DISCLOSED (non-a-greed) agreed upon a
"FULL 4 (FOUR) Element CONTRACT,"
"OUR" FULL "On The Record CONSENT," at a "JURY Trial."
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect
Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common
defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to
ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution HERE
We the People - establish Justice (< and that be
We the People - insure domestic Tranquility
We the People - provide for the common defense
We the People - promote the general Welfare,
We the People - secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our
We the People - do ordain and establish this Constitution
ARE any of you VIEWING this site, so debased, as to see that
there is NO MENTION of any wordage stating that anyone other than "We the People," not including
any words like "City, or County, or State or Federal DO ALL OF THE ABOVE?
REALLY? ONLY in a mal-functional mind would see the words... "We the People -
do ordain and establish this Constitution, and than turned 180
Degrees and GIVE THAT IT AWAY to "artificial factions!" created by "WE THE
PEOPLE!" That was a statement, more than a question! "WE"
wouldn't give OUR "RIGHTS" away to any agency, or pretended court,
in any location anywhere, or a group of paid "representatives, WITHOUT OUR, "ON THE RECORD, CONSENT!"
NOR ARE WE BOUND BY ANY MAN
MADE LAWS (READ > *HERE * ) ""WITHOUT OUR CONSENT!"" Since "we the
are the ones whom set up THE "Government," than "we the
have to "CONSENT" to be "governed,"
or "judged," including to, but not limited to, summons into ANY LAW-LESS (= NOTestablished by a real "Positive LAW,")
"pretended" court, agency, or department,
or any OTHER, even
hidden other "VOLUNTARY" action.
IF ANY of WE BREAK the LAW OF
"COMMON SENSE / LOGIC" BY TRESPASSING, or ENCROACHING, or HINDERING
ANY OTHER LIVING BEINGS, IN THE ENJOYMENT OF THEIR "RIGHTS," WE NEED
TO COME TO AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN the Assumed 'INJURED PARTY,' ""WITHOUT""
THE NEED OF ANY CORPORATE / COMPANY / CHARTERED, "court(s),"
IMPERSONATING an "REAL ARTICLE 3 TRIAL BY JURY, COURT.
WHO ARE ACTUALLY "INTERFERING" THRU THEIR PRETENDED
"ADJUDICATION," and OR any need of any "Arbitration," AS
PRETENDING TO BE "JUDICIAL OFFICERS / JUDGES." (the really sad thing
is some of these actual and factual FEDERAL CRIMINALS "ignorantly"
believe that they are "real judges," which is a "DELUSION OF
GRANDEUR," to state the very least, of what they really, and TRULY are
> "................ explicatives here
GOLDEN RULE SHOULD RULE:
ANY of THESE "IMPOSTERS" . . . "summons," or demand you to
"appear" in their "LAW-LESS," UN-REAL, NON JUDICIAL, UN-Constitutional,
ANTI-7th Amendment, NON TRIAL Action(s) (civil, .... when their
"dispute" is above $20 USD, or any "criminal," and there is NO other types,) and YOU as a Living Being, and you are
not an employee, nor directly connected as a Sub-Contractor, of
"THEIR" Public or Private Corporation, THAN the FOLLOWING Pertaint to ALL PARTIES, but not LIMITED to "ACTING".... "judges, prosecutors, clerks of court, or any "process servers," . . .
Amendment of the Constitution of the United States is quoted . . . → HERE
In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty
dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a
jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than
according to the rules of the common law.
This "RIGHT" applies within the
states, commonwealths, and territories of the United States. Gonzalez-Oyarzun
v. Caribbean City Builders, Inc., 27 F. Supp. 3d 265 - Dist. Court, D. Puerto
Rico 2014 → PDF HERE
[end of quote of the FEDERAL COURT JUDGE, that is NOT "brain dead" as
a FEW of the rest.]
IF any are having problems with the WORD.. "SUIT" in the phrase "In
Suits at common law, we will PROVIDE A LEGAL Definition from → HERE [Quoting, in part ... see "Fair Use LAW...]
is a generic term, of comprehensive signification, and applies to any
proceeding in a court of justice in which the plaintiff pursues, in
such court, the remedy which the law affords him for the redress of an
Injury or the recovery of a right It is, however, seldom applied to a
[end of quoted, and IF you can READ that means there are ONLY 2 Different TYPES of "cases, actions" EITHER 1."CIVIL or 2. CRIMINAL" and any and all who repeat, or try to convince you other-than-wise that WHATEVER case, or action is NOT EITHER "CIVIL OR CRIMINAL, they need a "frontal lobotomy reversal." and , and do NOT HAVE A CLUE what they are "talking about" And that includes to anyone with , (or without,) a LAW DEGREE
FACTS... SUITS 1. applies
to any proceeding in a court of justice in which the plaintiff pursues, (and
that INCLUDES ANY PLAINTIFF, anyone who STARTS an "action," including
US, or any of them, judges, prosecutors, OR WHO THE FLIP OTHERS, except 2.. . . however, seldom applied to
a criminal prosecution."
So are you really, truthfully, without DURESS, or THREAT of Confindment or FINE, "LAW-FULLY"
required to "appear" in their "ILLEGAL" administrative
tribunal function, even if you did sign a "ticket," or a
REALLY? See "Affidavit
Of Corporate Denial" below ****.
And he Legal meaning of "OUT OR COURT" is found → HERE [AND. . . QUOTING. . . ]
OUT OF COURT . . . He who has no legal statue in court is said to be “out of court,” [end of quote, AND That the FACTS of this SITE, to NOTIFY ALL PARTIES of any "action," that if. . . ANYONE "has NO legal statute," they are ALL. . . "OUT OF COURT," and NOT a "LEGAL ACTION or CASE, IN LAW.
[AND. . . QUOTING. . . ]
"The text of the Amendment itself states
as much: the right to a civil jury trial was "preserved," not
created. U.S. CONST. amend. VII; see also Baltimore & Carolina
Line v. Redman, 295 U.S.
654, 657, 55 S.Ct. 890, 79 L.Ed. 1636 (1935) ("[The] right of trial by jury thus
preserved is the right which existed under the English common law when the
Amendment was adopted."). → HERE
[AND. . . QUOTING. . . ]
"Nonetheless, one of "the best examples" of
the "clauses of the Constitution which guarantee[s] and safeguard[s] the
fundamental rights and liberties of the individual [is] the Seventh Amendment,
which guarantee[s] the right of trial by jury." Continental
Ill. Nat'l Bank & Trust Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co.,
275*275 294 U.S. 648, 669, 55 S.Ct. 595, 79 L.Ed. 1110 (1935). → HERE
"[T]he Bill of
Rights codified venerable, widely understood liberties." District
of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S.
570, 605, 128 S.Ct. 2783, 171 L.Ed.2d 637 (2008). The discussion of the
civil jury trial's importance in American history elucidates its paramount
importance. The basic right to a civil jury trial is a fundamental liberty
NOW TO GET RID OF THE LIES the FLAGRANT IGNOR-ANTS OF THE 7th. Amendment
.... conjured up out of their fictional "law" schools.
[COPIED and PASTED, as in quoting . . . from → HERE]
76 U.S. (9 Wall.) 274
provision in the Seventh Amendment of the Constitution of the United States
which declares that no fact tried by a jury shall be otherwise reexamined
in any court of the United States than according to the rules of the common law
applies to the facts tried by a jury in a cause in a state court.
2. So much
of the 5th section of the Act of Congress of March
3, 1863, entitled
"An act relating to habeas corpus and
regulating proceedings in certain cases," as provides for the removal of a
judgment in a state court, and in which the cause was tried by a jury, to
the circuit court of the United States for a retrial on the facts and law is
not in pursuance of the Constitution, and is void.
"If any suit or prosecution, civil
or criminal, has been or shall be commenced in any state court,. . . . [end
WHAT did that say...... OH YEA..... ". . . than according to the rules of the common law
applies to the facts tried by a jury in a cause in a state court." [end
THAT SAID AGAIN (like restating the same FACT. . . and LOOK REAL CLOSE to
see the words. . . )
"If any suit or prosecution, civil or criminal, has been or shall be
commenced in any state court,. . . [end of quote.]
Please.....ALLOW a NON-Bar-Carder to show
you the TRUTH... 1. ". . . than according to the rules of the common law applies
to the facts tried by a jury in a cause in a state court." Those WORDS should
convey to any NON-Devolved being as a meaning... 2. "rules of the common law applies
to the facts tried by a jury in a cause in a state court," as the
location of a "CIVIL STATE COURT," and that the "TRIAL BY
JURY" . . . "STARTED," IN a "STATE COURT," that the 3. "TRIAL BY
JURY" was "CIVIL" in that "State COURT," before it was
"reexamined." OH. . . that applies, unless it is NOT A REAL, as in a "Positive Law Statute"
"STATE COURT OF LAW?" Right!
WORD in that above "CASE LAW" that stated, look real close this time
proceedings in certain cases," as provides for the removal of a judgment in a
state court, and in which the cause was tried by a jury," Now
we know that the so-called "subject matter" was at the
beginning of the sentence "habeas corpus," [produce the body,] but the fact of the matter is the
statements were made TWICE that. . . ". . . than according to the rules of the common law
applies to the facts tried by a jury in a cause in a state court." and that was and is a "civil
"at common LAW."
the "bar-carders" referring to only to "CORPORATE" ADMINISTRATIVE
NON-CONSTITUTIONAL cases, in a NON "state
court civil jury trial cases," (?) NOT having "jury trials?" That must be what the
nay-sayers are referring to, HUH? Corporate Law attempting to over take, and
"common law jury trial, civil actions." And as a great
surprise, they are partly right, EXCEPT if any party, on either side "DEMANDS A JURY
Federal Courts, than THEY SHOULD GET A "JURY TRIAL" AS A GUARANTEE, by any, and ALL
(A-L-L) who have taken, any, "Oath of OFFICE, to "Defend / or UPHOLD"
the United States Constitution as follows . .
in copied and pasted . . . SEE "OATH OF
OFFICE" → HERE ]
28 U.S.C. Sec 453- Judiciary and Judicial Procedure. Oaths of justices and
judges. . . .
Each justice or judge of the United States shall take the following oath or
affirmation before performing the duties of his office: “I, ______________, do
solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to
persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will
faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon
me as _________________ under the Constitution and laws of the United States.
So help me God.” [end of quote. and ALL, or anyone who is an "officer" of any Judicial and Judicial Procedure, IS REQUIRED to, under THAT "POSITIVE LAW STATUTE," to give their "OATH" to ALL THEM THERE WORDS, also be "BONDED," (as in "INSURED,") or they are NOT "Judges" of any "JUDICIAL PROCEDURE," IN THIS COUNTRY!]
SO . . .
WARNING TO ALL the "Actors," or whoever, that are pretending to be... UNDER the NON-Enacted,
NON-Codified, NON-Positive, NON-Law, that they are "fraudulently extorting
support payments, and court fees, etc., etc., etc.," which is . . .Title 42; OR Title 21 ; OR Title 47 U.S.C., then YOU / "THEY" are conversely under the FOLLOWING. . . since you, and some of
"THEY" can see the WORDS . . . again stating . . . "Each justice or
judge of the United States shall take the following oath or affirmation before
performing the duties of his office:" and if the "THEY" be under one "POSITIVE LAW," U.S.C,
then the "THEY"
be UNDER ALL THE US CODE, including the "Oath of Office," ALSO.
case you, or the "THEY" missed it, . . . "THE PREAMBLE OF THE United States Constitution IS IN
THE CONSTITUTION, and the "BILL OF RIGHTS," are IN the Constution of the United States," and YOU are also INSIDE THAT CONTRACT, that STATES. . .
". . .under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God.” [end
Just a couple of "educated"
Maybe their "god," God, or GOD, just
is not "helping" them? .... Or 2. They just "mouthing" the words ,and NOT meaning ANY OF THEM! OR 3. maybe they DO NOT "understand" the English words, THEY SPOKE, and SIGNED, in front of WITNSESS "I do
solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will . . . .faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon
me as _________________ under the Constitution and laws of the United States" [END OF WHAT WAS "SWORN" AS AN "OATH. . .UNDER THE CONSTITUTION and LAWS," [not the NOT LAWS,] of the United States," And IF they DO NOT FILL_FULLY that "OATH," of that CONTRACT they should 1. "GO TO PRISON" and 2. PAY BACK to ALL their VICTIMS OF FRAUD," and 4. Lack of "Specified PERFORMANCE," of All ITEMS of said "CONTRACT" and at least 30 OTHER FEDERAL FELONIES that "we the people," can add in "THEIR" Personal FEDERAL CRIMINAL and CIVIL Complaints! And that was NOT a "threat," it is a Promise ,via the protection of a "Positive LAW, found at Title 18 Sec. 1512 → HERE
[and QUOTING, in part,
as in copy and pasted . . . ]
". . . OCGA §16-10-1
provides: “Any public officer who willfully and intentionally violates the
terms of his oath as prescribed by law shall, upon conviction thereof, be
punished by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than five years.”
(Emphasis supplied.) [end of quote. and "ANY"
means "ALL" of
them there "public officers," get "IMPRISONMENT," and
I'd vote for .... Without PAROLE for the whole "FIVE
YEARS!!" ]And THAT LAW is IN, as INSIDE all the State's Constitution or LAWS, no "free form dumb pass" on that fact, either.
LAW "CIVIL CASES" read (for the pretend-a-judges, and the
pretend-a-prosecutors, and the rest of the "RICO gang" to INSTRUCT them in
"REAL LIFE JURY TRIALS." PDF → HERE Oh, yes, you can attempt to persuade "others" with a LIE, but that is NOT GOING TO HAPPEN IN THIS IMMEDIATE CASE. See the ABOVE
DISCLAIMER → HERE
1 IF . . .you can NOT RECEIVE A "JURY TRIAL," TO DECIDE THE OUTCOME
/ VERDICT OF THE "DISPUTE," ACTION, THAN FACT . . . . IT IS NOT
A "R-E-A-L C-O-U-R-T!"
2 Is that the "THEY" are NOT "Constitutional," NOR "LAWFUL," in any aspect,
including their violating their sworn "OATHS OF OFFICE." to UPHOLD and Defend
the Constitution of the United States. Which makes them, not
only "voluntary LIARS," but actual terrorists, who are
"declaring war against the LAW(S) of this COUNTRY," also.
NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES . . .
can be "copied" from this site, BUT . . . any LINK, or referenced
URL, connected to the internet, has to have the URL / Web Address attached,
affixed, pointing to the LINKS provided this information, for legal educational
reference, and, to satisfy all "Copy Write and "Fair USE"
Positive LAWS, in "our country."
ALL (A-L-L,) "INFERIOR
COURTS" ARE 100% "SUBJECT," and OR ARE
"UNDER THE COMPLETE CONTROL" OF THE "UNITED
STATES SUPREME COURT'S" DECISIONS, / VERDICTS, and MUST / SHALL COMPLY TO
THE US SUPREME COURT DECISIONS / VERDICTS, as their
"deciding" factors, of ALL decisions, of any "INFERIOR
courts," (yes, ALL of them,) are directly UNDER CASE "LAW"
RULINGS. (LOOK UP the words "CASE LAW RULINGS," and than "Abide BY IT
["Abide" means "OBEY IT.")
THE FOLLOWING REASON-ABLE FACTS OF TRUTH AS
"REAL CASE LAWS" ARE AS FOLLOWS . . .
Holding v. Malley-Duff, 483 U.S. 143 (1987) → HERE
Case Law "Ruling" from the United States "SUPREME"
Court . . ]
"Unlike 1983, however, we believe that it is a federal statute that offers
the closest analogy to civil RICO. The
Clayton Act, 38 Stat. 731, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 15, offers a far
closer analogy to RICO than any state law alternative. Even a
cursory comparison of the two statutes reveals that the civil action provision
of RICO was patterned after the Clayton Act. The Clayton Act provides:
person who shall be injured in his business or property by reason of anything
forbidden in the antitrust laws may sue therefor in any district court of
the United States . . . and shall recover threefold the
damages by him sustained, and the cost of suit including a reasonable
attorney's fee." [end of quote.]
enforcement provision provides:
"Any person injured in his business or
property by reason of a violation of section 1962 of this chapter may sue
therefor in any appropriate United States district court and shall recover threefold
the damages he sustains and the cost of the suit, including a reasonable
attorney's fee." [end of quote.]
RICO and the Clayton Act are designed to remedy economic injury by providing
for the recovery of treble
damages, costs, and attorney's fees. Both statutes bring
to bear the pressure of "private attorneys general" on a
serious national problem for which public prosecutorial resources are deemed
inadequate; the mechanism chosen to reach the objective in both the Clayton
Act and RICO is the carrot of treble damages. Moreover, both statutes aim to compensate the same
type of injury; each requires that a plaintiff show injury "in his
business or property by reason of" a violation." [end
[QUOTING . .
"In rejecting a
significantly different focus under RICO, therefore, we are honoring an analogy
that Congress itself accepted and relied upon, and one that promotes the
objectives of civil RICO as readily as it furthers the objects of the Clayton
Act. Both statutes share a common congressional objective of encouraging civil
litigation to supplement Government efforts to deter and penalize the respectively prohibited
practices. The object of civil RICO is thus not merely
to compensate victims but to turn them into prosecutors, "private
attorneys general," dedicated to eliminating racketeering activity.3 Id.,at
(citing Malley-Duff, 483 U.
S., at 151 → HERE ) (civil RICO specifically has a "further
purpose [of] encouraging potential private plaintiffs diligently
to investigate"). The provision for treble damages is accordingly
justified by the expected benefit of suppressing racketeering activity, an
object pursued the sooner the better."
. . Rule 11(b)(3), allowing
pleadings based on evidence reasonably anticipated after further
investigation or discovery. See, e. g., Corleyv. Rosewood
Care Center, Inc. of Peoria,142 F.3d 1041, 1050-1051 (CA71998) (relaxing particularity requirements of Rule
9(b) where RICO plaintiff lacks access to all facts
necessary to detail claim). It is not that we mean to reject Rotella's concern
about allowing "blameless ignorance" to defeat a claim . . "Uriev. Thompson,337 U.
S. 163, 170 (1949) → HERE . . ."
of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.
It is so
ordered. [end of quote.]
Did you all actually "SEE" the WORDS......
"It is so ordered?" LOOKS like a "Court ORDER!" which is the Legal term called
"Stare Decisis" meaning "A judge is bound to follow precedent of earlier decisions."
HEY "judges" do we need us to provide you also with the DEFINITION of the word "BOUND,"
or would you RATHER chooses the experience of being "bound" as in "incarseration?"
Those WORDS are
a " a demand, or a command," which equals the word,
"ORDER." AND US SUPREME COURT DECISIONS DO "ORDER" ALL of the
"Inferior pretend-a-article-3-judical-quasi-courts" BELOW the US
SUPREME COURT, to abide, OBEY, and
AGREE be controlled TOTALLY by THEIR decisions on ALL of
the same "SUBJECT MATTER." The word
"RULING," as in "Case L-A-W" means it is to "RULE" the "LOWER /
INFERIOR courts in this country, as a "STANDARD," a GUIDE to what all
Judgments, Decisions, Orders, ETC: ETC: ETC: are to actually their FINAL VERDICT EQUALS the "Verdicts" of the S-U-P-R-E-M-E COURT.
EXAMPLE would be.... The Head CEO states "IT IS SO ORDERED!" and EVERYONE below the
HEAD CEO do what was "ORDERED!" Which would be like.... the United States
SUPREME Court stating. . . "IT IS SO
That is NOT an . . . "if you feel like it, or
don't feel like following THEIR "DECISION," it is an . . . "O-R-D-E-R" to do so,
by THE "S-U-P-R-E-M-E"
"RULER" AGENT. HEAD CEO of the "JUDICIAL SYSTEM!" AND .... NOT if your so-called "judge,"
of any so-called "justice of the peace," or any municipal court,
or any county, or district, or appeals court, or state supreme court, or any "FEDERAL Court, or ANY OTHER
Quasi- COURT, or whatever the "IMPOSTERS"
/ IMPERSONATORS think to do or call themselves, "other-than-wise"
as. So for a "reiteration". . . The United States S-U-P-R-E-M-E Court SAID IT, SO "JUST DO
IT IS SO "ORDERED!"
CHOICE! "JUST DO IT" and EXACTLY THAT WAY, or SUFFER AT YOUR OWN
PERIL, danger, risk, demise, "job loss," down fall ETC, and with "TRIPLE DAMAGE$," at that, and "PRISON
INFERIOR" pretended "courts" want YOU to "OBEY" their
pretended "orders," but without an actual
LAW (example Title 42 U.S.C (or Title 42 C.F.R,) are ILLEGAL, and if these "NON JURY
quasi-court do NOT need to follow their SUPREME COURT RULINGS (Head CEO's) "ORDERS." That is just a
"double standard" to state the LEAST.
Remember: an UN-Constitutional "order" does NOT have to be "obeyed," as neither does any UN-Constitutional LAW.
[NOW one of my most favor- right, actual,
factual Case "LAW"
as follows . . . . ]
From HERE . . . . ]
Field delivered the opinion of the court.
"An unconstitutional act is not a law; it
confers no rights; it imposes no duties; it affords no protection; it creates
no office; it is, in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never
been passed." [end of quote.] United States Supreme
Court: NORTON v. SHELBY COUNTY(1886) No. 264
NOTICE: That "VERDICT," or "case L-A-W" has never been
overruled, overturned, nor set aside, so it still STANDS TODAY, as
an "ORDER," to ALL so-called
LET US, and the "skimmer and
grinners," RE-View that "case L-A-W". . . . that pertains directly to ALL other
PRETENDED "DECISIONS, or "fake orders," in ALL them
"LOWER" courts, that have "NO CLUE" on any of "subject matter
of this site!"
Which are "VOID," and "UNCONSTITUTIONAL" when used "against we the
1. "An unconstitutional act is not a law.
. . that
really means it is "NOT a L-A-W!"
2. "it confers no rights;" (on ANY so-called "law enforcement, nor "NON-TRIAL-Quasi-courts.)
3. "it imposes no duties;" (on
"we the people." to abide by NOR "obey, NOR be "judged
4. "it affords no protection;" (Nope, NOT ANY to
"law enforcement or "NON-TRIAL-Quasi-courts, have "NO IMMUNITY, ZERO, NADA, NONE!")
5. "it creates no office;" (gives
"NO LAW-FULL AUTHORITY,"
"Jurisdiction" over anyone, anytime, anywhere.)
6. "it is, in legal contemplation, as
inoperative as though it had never been passed." (BINGO . . . PLUS
those 6 Parts of a
"RULING" ("R-U-L-I-N-G" means it "RULES,").... which
what this site is all about, which is there exists, "NO
immunity" (see NO. 4. above,) in any "ACTION for any reason," AND, If the
perps (perpetrators) could only R-E-A-D, AND, could understand what those
. . . . that one CASE, would Totally STOP any and ALL "LEO" (Law
Enforcement Officer,) and or ANY and ALL "JO"
(pretended "Judicial Officer,") or, like any
"clerks of court, and ALL prosecutors, and all "process
servers," (refer to NOs. 2., 4., 5. and 6. just above,) and. or anyone else
connected to said (NONE) "jurisdictional" ACTORS in their OWN
FAKE "NON-TRIAL quasi-court "TRAPS."
And as an Example: Title 42 U.S.C (ie. Family Courts
(sick) pretended RULES, (for PROFIT,) that is Never Been "Codified" NOR "ENACTED," as "POSITIVE
(MORE "REBUTTABLE PROOF" of NON "POSITIVE
LAW" → HERE )
PDF LIST of "Positive and NON positive CODES → HERE
SINCE Title 42 U.S.C HAS NEVER BEEN . . .
1. "ENACTED" NOR
2. "CODIFIED" NOR
3. "PASSED as a POSITIVE LAW,"
which is stated Under the "FAIR USE
LAW Positive Law Title 17 U.S.C Sec. 102; 105, for "Education Purposes" only as follows. . .
QUOTING from (in part from . . . ) uscode.house.gov/codification/term_positive_law.htm
. . .
"in general, the term "positive
law" connotes statutes, i.e., law that has been enacted by a duly authorized
SO. . . what is the OPPOSITE of a. . .
"law that has been enacted by a duly
OH YES. "a NON LAW . . .that "HAS
"been enacted," by as NON-DULY a NON-Authorized NON-Legislature, that is what that "NON-Judicial,
NON-Authority granting, F-A-K-E "LAW," when it is a "NON-Positive,"
and "NON-CODIFIED" and NON-"PASSED as a POSITIVE LAW,"
making it a "NON-L-A-W." [and all the "illiterate" just blink
and than say, "yes it is!"]
AND... That is a "No
Brainer" when anyone can NOT understand that "SIMPLE
FACT." NOT ONLY are they legally, and law-fully UN-FIT for any
"Public OFFICE" they need to be "INCARCERATED" until they
PAY for their CRIME$.
AND Again QUOTING more Easy to Understand
FACTS . . (fair use parts. . . )
"Positive law typically consists of
enacted law—the codes, statutes, and regulations that are applied and enforced
in the courts. The term derives from the medieval use of positum (Latin
"established"), so that the phrase positive law literally means law
established by human authority." Black's Law Dictionary
1200 (8th ed. 2004) → HERE or HERE
So what does the WORDS mean
stated above that stated. . . "Positive law typically consists of
enacted law — the codes, statutes, and regulations that are applied and
enforced in the courts." [end of quote.]
OH.... that means.... that... ONLY. . . "Positive law - are "enacted"
as codes, statutes, and or "regulations (RULES)," are the ONLY LAWS . .
. "that are applied
and enforced in the courts."
The REST DO NOT APPLY, AGAINST US, nor
"AUTHORITY," OR "FORCE OF LAW, nor are to be used AGAINST US, and only
the . . . THEM.
[QUOTING . .
. in part. → HERE ]
"Positive laws (Latin: ius positum) are
human-made laws that oblige or specify an action.
It also describes the establishment of
specific rights for an individual or group. Etymologically, the name derives
from the verb to posit.".
DID YOU HAPPEN TO SEE THE WORDS.... "It also
describes the establishment of specific rights for an individual or
And with those words stated . . . WHAT IS THE
OPPOSITE OF A "POSITIVE LAW,"
OH YEA.... A "NEGATIVE LAW" that DOES NOT "describes the
establishment of specific rights for an individual or group."
AND IF THAT "GROUP" such as any
quasi-court are attempting to USE "NON POSITIVE" NON-LAWS against us? WOE!
THEN FOLLOWING "ACTION" COMES INTO
EFFECT . . .
(MORE ON "POSITIVE LAW," and the
"Statutes and Codes that pertain directly to only THEM. → HERE! )
NOW LET US.....
these perps, (perpetrators,) get in Title 18 U.S.C. Sec. 241 and 242 → HERE, (Sec. 241.
in part. . . )
[QUOTING . .
. . ]
U.S.C Sec. 241 states. . . .
If two or
more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in
any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free
exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the
Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so
exercised the same; or
If two or
more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with
intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or
privilege so secured-
be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and
if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if
such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse
or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for
life, or both, or may be sentenced to death." [end
of quote. and any two or more includes, but not limited to, any "judge(s)
or any "prosecutor(s,) or any "clerks of the [quasi-]courts.]
YES.... and the "they" do NOT have to "PLAN to commit a FELONY," all they have to do is "APPLY an
a law, (also known as the "color of law," any
"NON-ENACTED-NON-Codified-NON-POSITIVE ACT, also known as "prima
facie" which means...."At first look as fact presumed to be true unless it
is disproved (as a law,) as in "UNCONSTITUTIONAL," THEN the "perps" get to enjoy G-POP (General Population) in a Federal
Penitentiary., at 10 YEARS, **PER COUNT.**")
[from →HERE ]. . .
1 USC § 204. Codes and supplements as evidence of the
laws of United States and District of Columbia; citation of Codes and
Provided, however that whenever titles of such Code shall have been enacted
into positive law the text thereof shall be legal evidence of the laws therein
contained, in all courts of the United States, the several states, and the
territories and insular possessions of the United States. [end
means any "NON-ENACTED"
"Statute" "NON-Positive, NON-CODIFIED as a REAL LAW," that "text thereof
shall," NOT "be legal
evidence.... in all the courts of the United States."
Please NOTICE the
"words pertaining directly, to the "NON-POSITIVE
law" equals the legal
phrase . . .
for as "An Example, any
Title 42 U.S.C. "NON-POSITIVE," and "Non-Enacted,
NON-Lawful-Courts of the "United States [Inc.] (see here **
Funded (Fed Pay Offs,) just call themselves, "family courts," which
are " . . . such acts
include kidnapping, and or an attempt to kidnap. . ." since that CODE (Title 42,) that is actually a
FAKE, "color of
law," (colored to look like a law,) pertain directly to ONLY Federal
employees, and or a Federal Sub-Contractors, and or their families, ONLY. . .
the people CONSENT" to abide by Title 42, U.S.C. under a "fully
disclosed" (explained.) As a LAWFUL 4 element, contract, is
1. the "offer"
is "fully disclosed" contract, and
that understand the entirety of the contract, as in the phrase "meeting of the
subject matter, or has to be LEGAL see NORTON v. SHELBY COUNTY(1886) No. 264 again.... (
4. and the acceptance, and if the
"contract' runs more than a YEAR, it has to be writing.
SO as the EXAMPLE above, or
Title 42 U.S.C is NOT "ENACTED" as "Positive LAW" to
be, LEGAL, or Binding, or LAWFUL to gain any "subject matter"
NOR "personal jurisdiction," over Any NON-Federal employees, their immediate
families, and or Sub-Contractors, and their immediate families, with a 4
QUOTING (in part) . . .
LAW CODIFICATION - Office of the Law Revision Counsel
Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, is a non-positive law title. Title 42
is comprised of many individually enacted Federal statutes--such as the Public
Health Service Act and the Social Security Act--that have been editorially
compiled and organized into the title, but the title itself has not been
enacted. [end of quote.] uscode.house.gov/codification/legislation.shtmluscode.house.gov/codification/legislation.shtml
Quote and PDF → HERE under "Fair Use Law" (in part) . .
[QUOTING . .
. . ]
States Code is divided into subject matter titles. Some are "positive
law" titles and some are "non-positive law" titles. The
law title of the United States Code is - itself - a Federal statute.
non-positive law title of the United States Code is an editorial compilation of
title 10, United States Code, "Armed Forces", is a positive law title
because the title, per se, has been explicitly enacted.
title 42, United States Code, "The Public Health and Welfare", is a
non-positive law title. The Federal statutes set out editorially in title 42
have been explicitly enacted, but title 42, per se, has not.
set out in non-positive law titles of the United States Code may vary slightly
from the precise language enacted into law; cross references are adapted and
stylistic changes are made in order to facilitate the integration of Federal
statutory provisions into the United States Code. By contrast, a positive law
title of the United States Code constitutes the precise statutory language
enacted into law. [end of quote.] http://uscode.house.gov/codification/positive_law_codification.pdf → HERE
again, and again, until the perps can understand ......
[QUOTING . .
. . ]
title 42, United States Code, "The Public Health and Welfare", is a
non-positive law title. The Federal statutes set out editorially in title 42
have been explicitly enacted, but title 42, per se, has not." → HERE [end
SO just another FACT of "specific
evidence" that the EXAMPLE Title 42 U.S.C IS NOT "A NON-POSITIVE LAW
. . . and
these "ACTORS ACT".... "under the color of law," pertaining to lawful
judges, or lawful prosecutors or lawful "clerks of a lawful court,"
ARE NOT, and CAN NEVER BE SUCH, in any sense of the DEFINITIONS thereof. AND
without OUR "FULL
KNOWLEDGEABLE CONSENT," it is a FEDERAL FELONY / FRAUD to pretended
"jurisdiction," and, or any "legal or lawful
complicity," what-so-ever, NEVER!
BESIDES. . .
follows. . .
and try to re-read it until it you comprehend it totally! ]
DOANE'S ADMINISTRATORS (Supreme Court of the United States 1795) → HERE
"Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an
abstraction, and a creature of the mind only, a government can interface only
with other artificial persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor
substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible.
The legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any law,
agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than
corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them." [end
of copied and pasted.]
QUOTING in the yellow color ....
1. "Inasmuch as
every government is an artificial person,". . . NOW. . . DID that
BRAKE THE ICING ON THE FAKE COURT CAKE? And if any entity, or group of people,
whoever, work for ANY "government" agency, City, County or State
(sub-contracted to the FEDERAL) government, they ALL are in fact are "Artificial
persons," ALSO . . .
"government can interface only with other artificial persons."
Doesn't that Go Against ALL YOUR gov-mentle
Like "FULL TILT!" HUH?
LIKE WOW, HUH?
THAT "T-R-U-T-H sounds
"stranger" then the FICTION we all were TAUGHT! HUH?
WHY NOT "ALLOW," (and how long
should it take to "allow,") the TRUTH to SET YOU FREE! READY...
GO... "government can interface only with other artificial persons."
SO that SAID.... GOVERNMENT IS SUPPOSED TO INTERACT WITH ONLY OTHER GOVERNMENT
And are supposed to "judge" /
adjudicate ONLY OTHER GOVERNMENT agents of GOVERNMENT agencies. UNLESS one of
"artificial" persons, or any agents of the principal, COMMIT A
against of ONE OF THEIR United States Codes, and or State or Federal
Regulations, and or State of Federal Statutes, than "WE the PEOPLE" can be
PLAINTIFFS against them in their courts! They can lawfully have "court"
over one, or
more of their
"artificial persons," via a "TRIAL BY JURY" in one of
SO THAT IS HOW ARE "THEIR COURTS"
SUPPOSED TO HAVE "TRIALS" FOR (or Against.)
SO .... ARE YOU AN "ARTIFICIAL
answer is. . . . "NO" . . . than the "THEY" have NO "subject matter jurisdiction," NOR ANY "PERSONAL
JURISDICTION," NOR ANY "JUDICIAL STANDING," what so flipping EVER, over ANY of
OUR, AFFAIRS, by "any of their" contrived CORPORATE "NON-Positive
LAWS, Statutes, Codes, Rules or REGULATIONS," and duh
"they" are NOT even to communicate with you without YOUR PERMISSION.
THEY also lied, committed FRAUD, pretending / ACTING that YOU ARE AN "ARTIFICIAL
Some, if NOT most, bar carders, were taught NOT TO READ, the actual words in a
simple statement or question.
3. AND to be
more CONCLUSIVE .... "The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed
from creating and attaining parity with the tangible,"
NOTICE: WE ARE THE "TANGIBLE," and NOT duh they, who are the "ARTIFICIAL
PERSONS." YOU ARE STOPPED!
PERTAINS TO ANY, NON JUDICIAL, NON-JURY TRIAL, UN-CONSTITUTIONAL "artificial
Examples, just to name just FEW, such as....and ALL Family (pretended) Courts,
and Municipal (pretended) Courts, Justice of the Peace (pretended) Courts, and
ANY OTHER """NON
TRIAL,"""" quasi governmental agents, and ANY AND ALL NON-COMMON
"artificial persons," or "government" agencies."
4. AND..... "The legal
manifestation of this is that NO government, as well as any law, agency,
aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than corporate,
artificial persons and the contracts between them." [end
SINCE, only the "artificial, CORPORATE, ADMINISTRATIVE, government,
COURT'S, agents, can ONLY under a "legal manifestation of this is that NO
government, as well as any law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself
with anything other than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts
between them." [end of quote.]
SO .... DEMAND these "artificial" courts..... their evidence, of THE ABSOLUTE
PROOF THAT, "WE
the Living People, ON THE RECORD," are "Artificial PERSONS?" SO, WHERE IS YOUR PROOF? Where is your "Preponderance of
"IF" the "ACTORS" could READ. . . (be like a "heaven
on earth," SITUATION.") But they can NOT read thru "GREED
stained bar cards."
The following US SUPREME Court Case LAW, pertains directly to any and ALL
"NON-JURY," NON-Judicial, NON-Courts, and any and ALL agencies of any
city, county or state, or federal (sounding) named agency . . . . Copied and
Pasted, in part....]
are also of all grades, and made for varied objects; all governments are
corporations, created by usage and common consent, or grants and charters which
create a body politic for prescribed purposes; but whether they are private,
local or general, in their objects, for the enjoyment of property, or the
exercise of power, they are all governed by the same rules of law, as to the
construction and the obligation of the instrument by which the incorporation is
One universal rule of law protects persons and property. It is a fundamental
principle of the common law of England, that the term freemen of the kingdom,
includes 'all persons,' ecclesiastical and temporal, incorporate, politique or
natural; it is a part of their magna charta
(2 Inst. 4),
and is incorporated into our institutions. The persons of the members of
corporations are on the same footing of protection as other persons, and their
corporate property secured by the same laws which protect that of individuals.
46-7. 'No man shall be taken,' 'no man shall be disseised,' without due process
of law, is a principle taken from magna charta, infused into all our state
constitutions, and is made inviolable by the federal government, by the
amendments to the constitution." [Proprietors of Charles
River Bridge v. Proprietors of, 36 U.S. 420 (1837)] [Found →
HERE or HERE ]
AND THE NEXT
"SUPREME COURT CASE LAW CASE" is as follows. . .
HALE v. HENKEL 201 U.S. 43 at 89
HERE [most viewers, will, and or, should re-read
the following more than twice (2 TIMES), to re-place the
"lies" that your, [and or your quasi-teachers,] may have lied to you,
[and to them,] about . . . while you or they were "falsely"
believing that they were "studying" LAW?. . . . ]
verbatim . . . ]
of the court states:
"The "individual" may stand upon "his Constitutional
Rights" as a CITIZEN. He is entitled to carry on his
"private" business in his own way." His power to contract is
unlimited." He owes no duty to the State or to his neighbors to divulge
his business, or to open his doors to an investigation, so far as it may tend
to incriminate him. He owes no duty to the State, since he receives nothing
there from, beyond the protection of his life and property. "His
rights" are such as "existed" by the Law of the Land (Common
Law) "long antecedent" to the organization of the State", and
can only be taken from him by "due process of
law", and "in accordance with the Constitution." "He
owes nothing" to the public so long as he does not trespass
upon their rights." [end of quote. And I should
not have to use words like "Emphasis added," for anyone that actually
has an IQ above their shoe size. And the word "individual" in that
statement means one of "WE the living People," un-like the same word,
with a totally different meaning used in United States Codes.]
The CASES LISTED HEREIN ARE A "JUDICIAL
TO "ALL" COURT PERSONAL:
Including "judges," prosecutors,
clerks, bailiffs, ETC. ETC.
AND ANY AND ALL OTHER "NON-Positive
Law" Quasi-GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, Departments, State, City, County, Township,
FACTS as Evidence as follows . . .
Not ONLY does the "Case LAW" Rules, but ALSO the
ALL the United States Codes shall be applied within the "States" as in 28 U.S.C. § 1652 - Judiciary and Judicial
Procedure § 1652. State laws as rules of decision.
"The laws of the
several states, except where the Constitution or
treaties of the United States or Acts of Congress otherwise require
or provide, shall
be regarded as rules of decision in civil actions in the courts of
the United States, in cases where they apply."
[Refer to * 28 U.S.C. § 3002 below. (a
"Positive Law." )] [end of quote] Yes
"gang," "IN THE COURTS of the US," and
that includes so-called: traffic, municipal, JP, county, district, appeals, state
supreme, federal, federal appeals, and so-called
"bankruptcy," and ALL THE FIPPING REST OF THEM!
it has the word "COURT" in IT'S TITLE, than ALL of the "BILL OR
RIGHTS," and the U.S.C, the Federal and STATE, Rules of Criminal
and CIVIL PROCEDURE, and the STATE and FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONS
to ALL OF THEM.
That pertains DIRECTLY to ANY "court" anywhere IN THE UNITED STATES.
Unless they provide an "Signed and Attested AFFIDAVIT they are NOT a
"Corporate, or Incorporated" entity," Under the Pains and
Penalty, and under "Full Liability [not lie-ability,] signed
by all judges, all prosecutors, and all clerk of court's, etc., etc., in said
action, in and by their very own hands,' and their quasi-court Seal affixed to their
AFFIDAVIT, NOTARIZED! (Write one yourself, DIY .... as in
"Tweak" one of the ones → HERE )
And SINCE. . . .
1. "Silence Equals Consent" by NOT responding
REQUEST / DEMAND" or
2. IT automatically becomes "Evidence of their CORPORATE,
Administrative, NON Judicial Status," and will be used in one of THEIR CORPORATE
Superior COURTS under an "Grand Jury INDICTMENT,"
and or a "TRIAL
3. OR tell them that the are all invited to the INTERNATIONAL COURT . .
. PDF Handbook →HERE
ANY officer of the United States (Federal, and or State
(any and ALL inferior courts,) is a federal felony violation of 18 U.S.C. 912.
[QUOTING . .
. . ]
assumes or pretends to be an officer or employee acting under the authority of
the United States or any department, agency or officer thereof, and
acts as such, or in such pretended character demands or obtains any money,
paper, document, or thing of value, shall be fined under this title or
imprisoned not more than three years, or both." [end
of quote. and than sure sounds like a "promise."]
Aiding and abetting such impersonation is a felony violation of 18 U.S.C. 3 . as an "accessory after
(before or during,) the fact."
[QUOTING. . .]
knowing that an offense against the United States has been committed, receives,
relieves, comforts or assists the offender in order to hinder or prevent his
apprehension, trial or punishment, is an accessory after the fact.
as otherwise expressly provided by any Act of Congress, an accessory after the
fact shall be imprisoned not more than one-half the maximum term of
imprisonment or . . . fined not more than one-half the maximum fine prescribed
for the punishment of the principal, or both; or if the principal
is punishable by life imprisonment or death, the accessory shall be imprisoned
not more than 15 years." [end of quote.]
18 U.S.C. 4 When anyone tell anyone else, that
a crime is being committed, and that "anyone else" is in ANY
"law enforcement, judicial, or governmental compactly," and they do
NOT DO ANYTHING TO STOP the criminals, or notify other "LEOs or JOs.
"IMMEDIATELY: they become. . . the "WHOEVER[s]" . . . . ANY and ALL
[QUOTING . .
. . ]
knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the
United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to
some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United
States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three
years, or both. [end of quote. SO "we" all ought to
"Make it known," asap, if we can
find a "judge"]
or concealing a material fact that is within the jurisdiction of any branch
of the Federal government, and is another felony violation of 18 U.S.C. 1001.
[QUOTING . .
. . ]
Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the
jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the knowingly
d willfully-- , (a) falsifies, fact; Government of the United States conceals,
or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material
any representation; materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or
materially makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to
contain any false,
fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry; shall be fined under this title,
imprisoned not more than 5 years." [end of quote.]
Transmitting false and/or fraudulent court "process," subpoenas,
orders ETC., ETC., via U.S. Mail is mail fraud, another felony violation
of 18 U.S.C. 1341.
in part . . . ]
Whoever, having devised or
intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or
property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses,
representations . . . for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice or
attempting so to do, places in any post office or authorized depository for
mail matter, any matter or thing whatever to be sent or delivered by the Postal
Service, or deposits or causes to be deposited any matter or thing whatever to
be sent or delivered by any private or commercial interstate carrier. . . shall be fined under
this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both . . .
" [end of quote. that also includes, "Public
Notices" in news papers, or uploaded, and or posted into the internet, which
is covered by the words . . . "sent or delivered by any private or commercial
interstate carrier. . ." This is an "interstate," not for heir, "carrier."]
one of the RICO "predicate
acts" itemized at 18 U.S.C. 1961 et seq.
See also 28 U.S.C. 1691 in this context. (to
name a few of the 10 more FEDERAL CRIMINAL STATUTES that RULE any, and ALL COURT
PERSONAL within the BORDERS of the United States.)
[QUOTING . .
. . what most, lie repeaters call a "conspiracy theory," but it is an
actual, factual POSITIVE LAW, Statute, that states the following....copied and
and Judicial Procedure § 3002. Definitions. . .
State " means any of the several States, the District
of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth
of the Northern Marianas, or any territory or possession of
the United States
(15) ' United
States " means--
(A) a Federal
agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United
instrumentality of the United States. [end of quote.]
[SO let us
allow "LOGIC" (the rest can "peek past their bar card,") to
RULE in using the "Definition" of "United States," with (A) a " Federal
injecting the meaning, into (B) and
(C) as follows. . . .]
agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the "Federal
instrumentality of the " Federal corporation."
LOGICAL LOOK WE READ. . .]
State " means . . . .[a] " possession of the United
States [A Federal Corporation.]"
. . .
State " means . . . .[a] " possession of the Federal
SO, . . . FACT:
There is NO REAL, DEJURE, (equals any TRUE, REAL, ACCRUAL,)
"STATE and or FEDERAL " government" / COURTS, Agencies,
of and by "We the People" of the united states
of America. That includes ALL City, County as Sub-Contractor's of United
States. AND you do not have to believe that for it, for that to still be a
FACT. That's the bad news!
** NO ONE ! **
The GREAT NEWS IS.....
But YOU CAN FORCE THESE PERPS / Perpetrators /
"ACTORS" INTO "THEIR" so-called HIGHER COURTS,
to have "THEM" TRIED BY A "Trial by JURY," as a
"REMEDY," and at "TRIPLE DAMAGE VIA A "FEDERAL CRIMINAL
(Found HERE or HERE (scroll down
AND if the OTHER "ACTORS" /
"PRETENDED" GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, COURTS, etc., etc., etc.,
DO NOT ACT UPON SAID "FILED" FED
THEY CAN "JOIN" INTO THE CONSPIRACY UNDER Title 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3 AND
. . . . ]
AND BY HINDERING AN INVESTIGATION Title 18 Sec.
with intent to avoid, evade, prevent, or obstruct compliance, in whole or in
part, with any civil investigative demand duly and properly made under the
Antitrust Civil Process Act, willfully withholds, misrepresents, removes
from any place, conceals, covers up, destroys, mutilates, alters,
or by other means falsifies any documentary material, answers to written
interrogatories, or oral testimony, which is the subject of such demand; or
attempts to do so or solicits another to do so; or
Whoever corruptly, or by
threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences,
obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due
and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is
being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due
and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or. . .
Shall be fined under this title, imprisoned
not more than 5 years . . ." [end of quote.]
[QUOTING . .
. . ]
Title 18 Sec 1506 Theft or alteration of
record or process; →HERE
Whoever feloniously steals, takes away, alters,
falsifies, or otherwise avoids any record, writ, process, or other
proceeding, in any court of the United States, whereby
any judgment is reversed, made void, or does not take effect;
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned
not more than five years, or both. [end of quote.]
[QUOTING . . . . And
here is a GREAT AFFIRMATION for "It is so ORDERED" issued by the United
States Supreme Court, as in THEIR "IT IS SO ORDERED" challenge. ]
18 U.S.C. § 1509 - Obstruction of court orders → HERE
Whoever, by threats or force, willfully
obstructs, impedes, or interferes with, or willfully attempts to prevent,
obstruct, impede, or interfere with, the due exercise of rights or the performance
of duties under any order, judgment, or decree of a court of the United States,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
No injunctive or other civil relief against
the conduct made criminal by this section shall be denied on the ground that
such conduct is a crime.
[end of quote. Copied and pasted....]
"Take NOTICE of this JUDICIAL
This is an actual "NOTICE" that anyone (which
can include you,) who READS THIS "NOTICE," is being duly "NOTIFIED," as the "WHO-EVERS" MENTIONED ABOVE in the
18 U.S.C." which includes, but not limited to,) to ANY and ALL ... PO
"Police Officers, and ANY AND ALL LEOs (Law Enforcement Officers,
and ANY and ALL JOs (Judicial Officers, including prosecutors,
clerks etc. etc) OF THAT FACT, AS A WARNING AT THE BEGINNING OF THE COMPLAINT
RIGHT AFTER THE HEADING of Federal Complaint.
NOW FOR THE LINKS!
ANY OR ALL OF THE LINKED SITES, on this site, may (or may,) NOT
Agree, with any of the "subject matter," on this site.
SO With that FACT in Mind..... "NONE of the LINKED SITES
ARE LIABLE FOR ANYTHING ON THIS SITE."
AND. . . We are "NOT" RESPONSIBLE
for any "DEAD" Links!
BUT YOU can kindly, Let Us Know, and when we
we will attempt to fix, or what needs to be to
updated in any "dead" links.
OUR Newest Youtube Vid about this site. HERE
Older NPL video on other site. HERE
ALSO NPL video on another site. HERE
THE SUPREME LAW LIBRARY HERE
FAMILY Guardian HERE
Bouvier's LAW DICTIONARY HERE
Law Dictionary - Free Online HERE
ALL Municipal, and ALL JP / ALL Constable, and
ALL Traffic, courts (?) are in "TOTAL LACK of LAWFUL "Subject
to issue any "search warrants and or
arrest" warrants, that upon conviction could end in ANY "Jail
so ever. LAW-FULLY . . .
FACT: They, which are ALL mentioned, after the
FACT:, are ALL ONLY "Class C Misdemeanors" ,
1. "FINE ONLY,"
2. NO "jail time,"
3. NO "Confinement,"
but . . . YOU can "CONSENT" to
their UN-LAW-FULL, NON-JURY-TRIAL verdicts.
FOUND AT Youtube (™.)
Municipal Court have NO Jurisdiction
1 → HERE
Municipal Court have NO Jurisdiction 2 → HERE
Tap the PIC BELOW.
THAT Excellent DONATION SERVICE
BuyMeCoffee.com → HERE
SECURE: CONTACT US → HERE
TO "HELP" PROMOTE and GROW THIS SITE
THE FOLLOWING SITES are "SUBMIT
SO "ADD YOUR SITE" from the
"CLICK ON the TEXT LINKS!"
MORE TO COME INCLUDING DOCS / PDFs
ON ALL EXTERNAL LINKS . . . .
"ANY "LINKED" SITES, above may
or may NOT agree with SOME, or ALL
of the "Subject Matter" contained
herein, and are only provided as "EDUCATIONAL
REFERENCE MATERIAL," FOR
"RESEARCH," and totally HERE under the "FARE USE POSITIVE
LAW," Title 17 USC Sec 102 and 105
and under the "First Amendment" of
the united states Constitution, called the "Freedom of Speech."
** THIS IS THE "DISCLAIMER" at
the END of this Web Page:
SO YOU DON'T WASTE "OUR" TIME. . .
WE ARE NOT LEGALLY, nor MORALLY RESPONSIBLE
FOR ANYTHING YOU DO,
AND, OR, DO NOT DO,
IF YOU DO IT INCORRECTLY, OR
YOU DO IT WITH THE WRONG ATTITUDE.
[The "attitude" part is about if you
"believe" in what you are using, or not, or if it works or does not
If YOU DO NOT "REALLY" BELIEVE IN
WHAT YOU ARE USING WILL WORK,
OR EVEN .....
"IT WILL WORK," equals "The
BUT. . .
IF YOUR ATTITUDE / Belief is....
"it maybe should work,"
OR . . . "has it worked
OR "How do you know if it works
"THAT IS YOUR FAULT,"
and REALLY has NOTHING TO DO WITH THE
MATERIAL, NOR the Process.
BE-LIVE IT OR NOT.....
IF YOU DO NOT BELIEVE SOMETHING WILL
MORE THAN LIKELY, IT WILL NOT WORK!
SO . . . YOU SHOULD DO THE "ATTITUDE
Adjustments" BEFORE YOU
1. BEGIN any "process" filings
before you file, and
2. YOU START THROWING BLAME, on any