WELCOME TO

NOT PRACTICING LAW .INFO (or .US)

 

NOTICE:

READ the  "DISCLAIMER": at END of this Page. BEFORE you Proceed. HERE.


        WE ARE NOT "PRACTICING" LAW BECAUSE WE KNOW AND LIVE, THE "LAW OF COMMON LOGIC, AND OR COMMON SENSE." And WE DO NOT NEED TO "PRACTICE," NOR WILL WE NEED TO ASK FOR A LIE-Sense to DEFEND OUR RIGHTS AS "FREE LIVING BEINGS." And WE are NOT some "CORPORATE FICTION(S)," NOR "Agent(s)," Employee(s), Nor any "Sub-Contractor(s), for any "City, County, State, NOR any Federal "Charted" COMPANY QUASI- Court(s), IMPERSONATING AND Masquerading (Mask-a-Raiding,) as any "JUDICIAL Tribunal / court."

     NOR ARE WE TO BE "CONTRACTED" (placed under ANY "NON" FULLY DISCLOSED (a-greed) upon a FULL 4 Element CONTRACT,"
WITHOUT
"OUR FULL CONSENT!"

   PREAMBLE : We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution HERE

We the People - establish Justice

We the People - insure domestic Tranquility

­ We the People - provide for the common defence

We the People - promote the general Welfare,

We the People - secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity,

We the People - do ordain and establish this Constitution

ARE any of you VIEWING this site, so debased, as to see that there is NO MENTION of any wordage stating that anyone other than "We the People," including any words like "City, or County, or State or Federal DO ALL OF THE ABOVE? REALLY? ONLY in a mal-functional mind would see the words... "We the People - do ordain and establish this Constitution, and than turned 180 Degrees and GIVE THAT AWAY to "artificial factions!" That was a statement, more than a question! "WE" wouldn't give OUR "RIGHTS" away to any agency, or pretended court in any location anywhere, WITHOUT OUR, ON THE RECORD, CONSENT!

           NOR ARE WE BOUND BY ANY MAN MADE LAWS (READ > *HERE * ) ""WITHOUT OUR CONSENT!"" Since "we the people" are the ones whom set up THE "Government," than "we the people" have to "CONSENT" to be "governed," or "judged," including to, but not limited to, summons into ANY "pretended" court, agency, or department, or any OTHER hidden "VOLUNTARY" action.

   ** BUT... **

   IF WE BREAK the LAW OF "COMMON SENSE / LOGIC" BY TRESPASSING, or ENCROACHING, or HINDERING ANY OTHER LIVING BEINGS, IN THE ENJOYMENT OF THEIR "RIGHTS," WE NEED TO COME TO AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN the Assumed 'INJURED PARTY,' ""WITHOUT"" THE NEED OF ANY CORPORATE / COMPANY / CHARTERED, "court(s)," IMPERSONATING an "ARTICLE 3 TRIAL BY JURY, COURT.

           WHO ARE ACTUALLY "INTERFERING" THRU THEIR PRETENDED "ADJUDICATION," and OR any need of any "Arbitration," AS PRETENDING TO BE "JUDICIAL OFFICERS / JUDGES." (the really sad thing is some of these actual and factual FEDERAL CRIMINALS "ignorantly" believe that they are "real judges," which is a "DELUSION OF GRANDEUR," to state the very least, of what they really, and TRULY are > ................ explicatives here ................"

  
THE GOLDEN RULE SHOULD RULE:

     IF THESE "IMPOSTERS" . . . "summons," or demand you to "appear" in their UN-REAL, NON JUDICIAL, UN-Constitutional, ANTI-7th Amendment, NON TRIAL Action(s) (civil, when their "dispute" is above $20 USD,) and YOU as a Living Being, and you are not an employee, nor directly connected as a Sub-Contractor, of "THEIR" Corporation, and . . .

THE 7th Amendment of the Constitution of the United States is quoted . . . HERE

    In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

This right applies within the states, commonwealths, and territories of the United States. Gonzalez-Oyarzun v. Caribbean City Builders, Inc., 27 F. Supp. 3d 265 - Dist. Court, D. Puerto Rico 2014 PDF HERE  [end of quote of the FEDERAL COURT JUDGE, that is not "brain dead" as some of the rest.]

[AND. . . QUOTING. . . ]

     "The text of the Amendment itself states as much: the right to a civil jury trial was "preserved," not created. U.S. CONST. amend. VII; see also Baltimore & Carolina Line v. Redman, 295 U.S. 654, 657, 55 S.Ct. 890, 79 L.Ed. 1636 (1935) ("[The] right of trial by jury thus preserved is the right which existed under the English common law when the Amendment was adopted."). HERE

[AND. . . QUOTING. . . ]

    "Nonetheless, one of "the best examples" of the "clauses of the Constitution which guarantee[s] and safeguard[s] the fundamental rights and liberties of the individual [is] the Seventh Amendment[], which guarantee[s] the right of trial by jury." Continental Ill. Nat'l Bank & Trust Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co., 275*275 294 U.S. 648, 669, 55 S.Ct. 595, 79 L.Ed. 1110 (1935). HERE

 "[T]he Bill of Rights codified venerable, widely understood liberties." District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570, 605, 128 S.Ct. 2783, 171 L.Ed.2d 637 (2008). The discussion of the civil jury trial's importance in American history elucidates its paramount importance. The basic right to a civil jury trial is a fundamental liberty interest.

NOW TO GET RID OF THE LIES the FLAGRANT IGNOR-ANTS OF THE 7th. Amendment ....

 [COPIED and PASTED, as in quoting . . . from HERE]

The Justices v. Murray

76 U.S. (9 Wall.) 274

Syllabus

1. The provision in the Seventh Amendment of the Constitution of the United States which declares that no fact tried by a jury shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States than according to the rules of the common law applies to the facts tried by a jury in a cause in a state court.

2. So much of the 5th section of the Act of Congress of March 3, 1863, entitled

    "An act relating to habeas corpus and regulating proceedings in certain cases," as provides for the removal of a judgment in a state court, and in which the cause was tried by a jury, to the circuit court of the United States for a retrial on the facts and law is not in pursuance of the Constitution, and is void.

"If any suit or prosecution, civil or criminal, has been or shall be commenced in any state court,. . . . [end of quote.]

WHAT did that say...... OH YEA..... ". . .  than according to the rules of the common law applies to the facts tried by a jury in a cause in a state court." [end of quote.]

AND THAT SAID AGAIN (like restating the same FACT. . .  and LOOK REAL CLOSE to see the words. . . )

"If any suit or prosecution, civil or criminal, has been or shall be commenced in any state court,. . . [end of quote.]

Please.....ALLOW a NON-Bar-Carder to show you the TRUTH... 1. ". . .  than according to the rules of the common law applies to the facts tried by a jury in a cause in a state court." There is the words stating . . . . "rules of the common law applies to the facts tried by a jury in a cause in a state court," Those WORD should convey to any NON-Devolved being... mean... "rules of the common law applies to the facts tried by a jury in a cause in a state court," as the location of a CIVIL STATE COURT, and that the "TRIAL BY JURY" . . . "STARTED," IN a "STATE COURT," that the "TRIAL BY JURY" was "CIVIL" in that "State COURT," before it was "reexamined." 

AND the WORD in that above "CASE LAW" that state, look real close this time.....      "regulating proceedings in certain cases," as provides for the removal of a judgment in a state court, and in which the cause was tried by a jury," Now we know that the so-called 'subject matter" was at the beginning of the sentence "habeas corpus," but the fact of the matter is the statements were made TWICE that. . . ". . .  than according to the rules of the common law applies to the facts tried by a jury in a cause in a state court." and a "civil case" is also "at common LAW.

    OR are the "bar-carders" referring to only to "CORPORATE" law cases, in "state court civil jury trial cases," (?) NOT having "jury trials?" That must be what the nay-sayers are referring to, HUH? Corporate Law attempting to over take, and CON-Troll "common law jury trial, civil actions." And as a great surprise, they are partly right, EXCEPT if any party, on either side "DEMANDS A JURY TRIAL," in any "State," OR any Federal Courts THEY SHOULD GET A "JURY TRIAL" AS A GUARANTEE, by any and all who have taken, any, "Oath of OFFICE, to "Defend the United States Constitution as follows . .

[Quoting, PDF HERE, as in copied and pasted . . ]
28 U.S.C.- Judiciary and Judicial Procedure § 453. Oaths of justices and judges. . . .
Each justice or judge of the United States shall take the following oath or affirmation before performing the duties of his office: “I, ______________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as _______ under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God.”
[end of quote.]

SO . . . All the "Actors" are pretending to be UNDER the NON-Enacted, NON-Codified, NON-Positive, NON-Law, they "fraudulently extort support payments, court court fees, etc., etc., etc., Title 42 U.S.C then the "THEY" are conversely under the FOLLOWING. . . since you, and some of "THEY" can see the WORDS . . . again stating . . . "Each justice or judge of the United States shall take the following oath or affirmation before performing the duties of his office:" and the "THEY" be under one U.S.C, then the "THEY" be UNDER ALL THE US CODE, including the "Oath of Office," ALSO.

AND in case you or the "THEY" missed it . . . "THE PREAMBLE OF THE United States Constitution IS IN THE CONSTITUTION, that STATES. . .
". . .under the Constitution and laws of the
United States. So help me God.” [end of quote.]

SEE "OATH OF OFFICE  HERE   [and QUOTING, in part, as in copy and pasted . . . ]

  'OCGA §16-10-1 provides: “Any public officer who willfully and intentionally violates the terms of his oath as prescribed by law shall, upon conviction thereof, be punished by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than five years.” (Emphasis supplied.) [end of quote.]

    COMMON LAW "CIVIL CASES" read (for the pretend-a-judges, and the pretend-a-prosecutors, and the rest of the "RICO gang" to INSTRUCT them in "REAL LIFE JURY TRIALS." HERE Oh, yes, you can attempt to persuade with the LIE, but that is NOT GOING TO HAPPEN IN THIS IMITATE CASE. See the ABOVE DISCLAIMER > HERE

FACT: 1    IF . . .you can NOT RECEIVE A "JURY TRIAL," TO DECIDE THE OUTCOME / VERDICT OF THE "DISPUTE," ACTION, THAN FACT . . . .  IT IS NOT A "R-E-A-L C-O-U-R-T!"                         

FACT: 2    Is that the "THEY" are NOT  "Constitutional," in any aspect, including their violating their sworn "OATHS OF OFFICE." to UPHOLD and Defend the Constitution of the United States. Which makes them, not only "voluntary LIARS," but actual terrorists, who are "declaring war against the LAW(S) of this COUNTRY," also.

NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES . . .

   Anything can be "copied" from this site, BUT . . . any LINK, or referenced URL, connected to the internet, has to have the URL / Web Address attached, affixed, pointing to the LINKS provided this information, for legal educational reference, and, to satisfy all "Copy Write and "Fair USE" LAWS.

    FACT: 

   ALL (A-L-L,) "INFERIOR COURTS" ARE 100% "SUBJECT," and OR ARE "UNDER THE COMPLETE CONTROL" OF THE "UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT'S" DECISIONS, / VERDICTS, and MUST / SHALL COMPLY TO THE US SUPREME COURT DECISIONS / VERDICTS, as their "deciding" factors, of ALL decisions, of any "INFERIOR courts," (yes, ALL of them,) are directly UNDER CASE "LAW" RULINGS.  (LOOK UP the words "CASE LAW RULINGS," and than "Abide BY IT ["Abide" means "OBEY IT.")

NOW:

THE FOLLOWING REASON-ABLE FACTS OF TRUTH AS "REAL LAW" ARE AS FOLLOWS . . .

Agency Holding v. Malley-Duff, 483 U.S. 143 (1987) HERE

[QUOTING Case Law "Ruling" from the United States "SUPREME" Court . . ]

   "Unlike 1983, however, we believe that it is a federal statute that offers the closest analogy to civil RICO. The Clayton Act, 38 Stat. 731, as amended, 15 U.S.C.  § 15, offers a far closer analogy to RICO than any state law alternative. Even a cursory comparison of the two statutes reveals that the civil action provision of RICO was patterned after the Clayton Act. The Clayton Act provides:

    "Any person who shall be injured in his business or property by reason of anything forbidden in the antitrust laws may sue therefor in any district court of the United States . . . and shall recover threefold the damages by him sustained, and the cost of suit including a reasonable attorney's fee." [end of quote.]

15 U.S.C. § 15(a)

RICO's civil enforcement provision provides:

    "Any person injured in his business or property by reason of a violation of section 1962 of this chapter may sue therefor in any appropriate United States district court and shall recover threefold the damages he sustains and the cost of the suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee." [end of quote.]

18 U.S.C. § 1964(c)

   "Both RICO and the Clayton Act are designed to remedy economic injury by providing for the recovery of treble damages, costs, and attorney's fees. Both statutes bring to bear the pressure of "private attorneys general" on a serious national problem for which public prosecutorial resources are deemed inadequate; the mechanism chosen to reach the objective in both the Clayton Act and RICO is the carrot of treble damages. Moreover, both statutes aim to compensate the same type of injury; each requires that a plaintiff show injury "in his business or property by reason of" a violation." [end of quote.]

[QUOTING . . . ]

Rotella v. Wood - 528 U.S. 549 (2000) HERE

    "In rejecting a significantly different focus under RICO, therefore, we are honoring an analogy that Congress itself accepted and relied upon, and one that promotes the objectives of civil RICO as readily as it furthers the objects of the Clayton Act. Both statutes share a common congressional objective of encouraging civil litigation to supplement Government efforts to deter and penalize the respectively prohibited practices. The object of civil RICO is thus not merely to compensate victims but to turn them into prosecutors, "private attorneys general," dedicated to eliminating racketeering activity.3 Id.,at 187"

(citing Malley-Duff, 483 U. S., at 151 HERE ) (civil RICO specifically has a "further purpose [of] encouraging potential private plaintiffs diligently to investigate"). The provision for treble damages is accordingly justified by the expected benefit of suppressing racketeering activity, an object pursued the sooner the better."

    ". . . Rule 11(b)(3), allowing pleadings based on evidence reasonably anticipated after further investigation or discovery. See, e. g., Corleyv. Rosewood Care Center, Inc. of Peoria,142 F.3d 1041, 1050-1051 (CA71998) (relaxing particularity requirements of Rule 9(b) where RICO plaintiff lacks access to all facts necessary to detail claim). It is not that we mean to reject Rotella's concern about allowing "blameless ignorance" to defeat a claim . . "Uriev. Thompson,337 U. S. 163, 170 (1949) HERE . . ."

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

It is so ordered. [end of quote.]

Did you all actually "SEE" the WORDS......

"It is so ordered?" LOOKS like a "Court ORDER!]

    Those WORDS are a "demand, command," which equals the word, "ORDER." AND US SUPREME COURT DECISIONS DO "ORDER" ALL of the "Inferior pretend-a-article-3-judical-courts" BELOW the US SUPREME COURT, to abide, OBEY, and AGREE be controlled TOTALLY by THEIR decisions on ALL of the same "SUBJECT MATTER."  The  word "RULING," as in "Case L-A-W" means it is to "RULE" the "LOWER / INFERIOR courts in this country, as a "STANDARD," a GUIDE to what all courts "VERDICTS," Judgments, ETC: ETC: ETC: are to actually their FINAL VERDICT IS.

    AND .... That is NOT an . . . "if you feel like it, or don't feel like following THEIR "DECISION," it is a "O-R-D-E-R" to do so, by THE "S-U-P-R-E-M-E" "RULING" AGENT.  AND .... NOT if your so-called "judge" of any so-called "justice of the peace, or any municipal court, appeals court, state supreme court, or any "FEDERAL Court, or ANY OTHER PRETENDED COURT, or whatever the "IMPOSTERS" / IMPERSONATORS think to do or call themselves, "other-than-wise" as.

The United States S-U-P-R-E-M-E Court SAID IT, SO "JUST DO IT!" IT IS SO "ORDERED!"

    No other CHOICE! "JUST DO IT" and EXACTLY THAT WAY, or SUFFER AT YOUR OWN PERIL, danger, risk, demise, "job loss," down fall ETC, and with "TRIPLE DAMAGES," at that, and PRISON TIME!

The "INFERIOR" pretended "courts" want YOU to "OBEY" their pretended "orders." but are ILLEGAL, and if these "NON JURY TRAIL" quasi-court do NOT need to follow their RULING COURT'S "ORDERS." That is just a "double standard" to state the LEAST.  

    Remember: an UN-Constitutional "order" does NOT have to be "obeyed," as neither does any UN-Constitutional LAW. 

[NOW one of my most favor- right, actual, factual Case "LAW" cases is as follows . . . . ]

[QUOTING From HERE . . . . ]

Mr. Justice Field delivered the opinion of the court.

"An unconstitutional act is not a law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; it affords no protection; it creates no office; it is, in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed." [end of quote.]  United States Supreme Court: NORTON v. SHELBY COUNTY(1886) No. 264

NOTICE: That "VERDICT," or "case L-A-W" has never been overruled, overturned or set aside, so it still STANDS TODAY, as an "ORDER," to ALL so-called "INFERIOR" courts."

LET US, and the "skimmer and grinners," RE-View that "case LAW. . . . that pertains directly to ALL other PRETENDED "DECISIONS,"

in ALL "LOWER" courts. 

Which are "VOID," and "UNCONSTITUTIONAL" when used "against we the people."

1. "An unconstitutional act is not a law. . . that really means it is "NOT a LAW!"

2. "it confers no rights;" (on any so-called "law enforcement, nor "NON-TRIAL-courts.)

3. "it imposes no duties;" (on "we the people." to abide by NOR "obey, NOR be "judged by.")

4. "it affords no protection;" (Nope NO "law enforcement or "NON-TRIAL-courts, have "NO IMMUNITY, ZERO, NADA, NONE!")

5. "it creates no office;" (gives "NO AUTHORITY," nor "jurisdiction" over anyone, any time, and anywhere.)

6. "it is, in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed." (BINGO PLUS "TRIPLE DAMAGES!")

     NOW, those 6 Parts of a "RULING" ("R-U-L-I-N-G").... STATES what this site is all about, which is there exists, "NO immunity" (see NO. 4. above,) in any "ACTION for any reason,"  If the perps (perpetrators) could only R-E-A-D, AND, could understand what those WORDS STATED,, . . . . that one CASE, would STOP any "LEO (law enforcement officer,) and or "JO" (pretended "Judicial Officer,") or, like any "clerks of court, like ALL prosecutors, "process servers," (refer to NOs. 2., 4., 5. and 6. just above,) and or anyone else connected to said (NONE) "jurisdictional" ACTORS in their OWN FAKE "NON-TRIAL quasi-court "TRAPS." 

And as an Example: Title 42 U.S.C (ie. Family Courts (sick) pretended RULES, (for PROFIT,)  that is Never Been "PASSED NOR "ENACTED," as POSITIVE LAW."

SINCE Title 42 U.S.C HAS NEVER BEEN . . .

1. "ENACTED" NOR

2. "CODIFIED" NOR

3. "PASSED as POSITIVE LAW,"

which is stated Under the "FAIR USE LAW" for "Education Purposes" only as follows. . . 

QUOTING from (in part from  . . . ) uscode.house.gov/codification/term_positive_law.htm . . .      

"in general, the term "positive law" connotes statutes, i.e., law that has been enacted by a duly authorized legislature."

SO. . .  what is the OPPOSITE of a. . . 

"law that has been enacted by a duly authorized legislature?"

OH YES. "a NON LAW . . .that  "HAS NOT "been enacted," by as NON-DULY a NON-Authorized NON-Legislature, that is what that "NON-Judicial, NON-Authority granting, F-A-K-E "LAW," when it is a "NON-Positive," and "NON-CODIFIED" and NON-"PASSED as a POSITIVE LAW," making it a "NON-L-A-W." [and all the "illerate" say, yes it is!]

AND... That is a "No Brainer" when anyone can NOT understand that "SIMPLE FACT." NO ONLY are they legally and law-fully UN-FIT for any "Public OFFICE" they need to be "INCARCERATED until the PAY for their CRIMES.

AND Again QUOTING more Easy to Understand FACTS . . (fair use parts. . . )

"Positive law typically consists of enacted law—the codes, statutes, and regulations that are applied and enforced in the courts. The term derives from the medieval use of positum (Latin "established"), so that the phrase positive law literally means law established by human authority." Black's Law Dictionary 1200 (8th ed. 2004) HERE

So what does the WORDS mean stated above that stated. . . "Positive law typically consists of enacted law—the codes, statutes, and regulations that are applied and enforced in the courts."  [end of quote.]

OH.... that means.... that... ONLY. . . "Positive law - are "enacted" as codes, statutes, and or "regulations (RULES), are the ONLY LAWS . . . "that are applied and enforced in the courts."

 The REST DO NOT APPLY, AGAINST US, or AFFORDS ANY "AUTHORITY" nor are to be used AGAINST US, and only THEM.

[QUOTING . . . in part. HERE ]

 "Positive laws (Latin: ius positum) are human-made laws that oblige or specify an action.

It also describes the establishment of specific rights for an individual or group. Etymologically, the name derives from the verb to posit.".

DID YOU HAPPEN TO SEE THE WORDS...."It also describes the establishment of specific rights for an individual or group."

And with those words stated . . . WHAT IS THE OPPOSITE OF A "POSITIVE LAW,"

OH YEA....A "NEGATIVE LAW" that DOES NOT "describes the establishment of specific rights for an individual or group."

AND IF THAT "GROUP" such as any quasi-court are attempting to USE "NON POSITIVE" NON-LAWS against us? WOE!

THEN FOLLOWING "ACTION" COMES INTO EFFECT . . . .

See what these perps, get in Title 18 U.S.C. Sec. 241 and 242 HERE, ( Sec. 241. in part. . . ) [QUOTING . . . . ]

Title 18 U.S.C Sec. 241 states. . . .

If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same;  or

If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured-

They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both;  and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death." [end of quote.]

   YES.... and the "they" do NOT have to "PLAN to commit a FELONY," all they have to do is "APPLY an UNCONSTITUTIONAL" pretend a law, (also known as the "color of law, any NON-ENACTED-NON-POSITIVE law, also known as "prima facie" which means...."At first look as fact presumed to be true unless it is disproved (as a law,) as in "UNCONSTITUTIONAL, THEN the "perps" get to enjoy G-POP (General Population) in a Federal Penitentiary., up to 10 YEARS, **PER COUNT.**")  

AND QUOTING [from HERE ]. . .

1 USC § 204. Codes and supplements as evidence of the laws of United States and District of Columbia; citation of Codes and supplements.

(a) United States Code

   Provided, however that whenever titles of such Code shall have been enacted into positive law the text thereof shall be legal evidence of the laws therein contained, in all courts of the United States, the several states, and the territories and insular possessions of the United States. [end of quote.]

SO.... that means any "NON-ENACTED" "Code" "NON-Positive, NON-CODIFIED as a REAL LAW," that "text thereof shall," NOT "be legal evidence.... in all the courts of the United States."

   Please NOTICE the "words pertaining directly, to the "NON-POSITIVE law" equals the legal phrase . . .  "color of law" for as "An Example, any Title 42 U.S.C. "NON-POSITIVE," and "Non-Enacted, NON-Court of the "United States [Inc.] (see here ** )." Funded (Fed Pay Offs,) Family Courts, which are " . . . such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap. . ." since that CODE (Title 42,) that is actually a FAKE, "color of law," (colored to look like a law,) pertain directly to ONLY Federal employees, and or a Federal Sub-Contractors, and or their families, ONLY. . .  unless "we the people CONSENT" to abide by Title 42, U.S.C. under a "fully disclosed" (explained.) 4 element, contract, is as follows....                                             

1. the "offer"  is "fully disclosed" contract, and . . .                                                                                          

2. parties that understand the entirety of the contract, as in the phrase "meeting of the minds"

3. legal subject matter, or has to be LEGAL see NORTON v. SHELBY COUNTY(1886) No. 264 AGAIN.....  ( and,)                                                                   

4. and the acceptance, and if the "contract' runs more than a YEAR, it has to be writing.  

     SO as the EXAMPLE above, or Title 42 U.S.C is NOT "ENACTED" as "Positive LAW" to be, LEGAL, or Binding, or  LAWFUL to gain any "subject matter" NOR "personal jurisdiction," over Any NON-Federal employees, their immediate  families, and or Sub-Contractors, and their immediate families, with a 4 ELEMENT, CONTRACT.   

NEXT FACT: QUOTING (in part) . . .

    "POSITIVE LAW CODIFICATION - Office of the Law Revision Counsel

By contrast, Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, is a non-positive law title. Title 42 is comprised of many individually enacted Federal statutes--such as the Public Health Service Act and the Social Security Act--that have been editorially compiled and organized into the title, but the title itself has not been enacted. [end of quote.] uscode.house.gov/codification/legislation.shtmluscode.house.gov/codification/legislation.shtml HERE

[NEXT FACT: Quote and PDF HERE under "Fair Use Law" (in part) . . .]

[QUOTING . . . . ]

Positive law titles

The United StatesCode is divided into subject matter titles. Some are "positive law" titles and some are "non-positive law" titles. The difference is this:                                              

A positive law title of the United States Code is - itself - a Federal statute.

A non-positive law title of the United States Code is an editorial compilation of Federal statutes.

For example, title 10, United States Code, "Armed Forces", is a positive law title because the title, per se, has been explicitly enacted.

Alternatively, title 42, United States Code, "The Public Health and Welfare", is a non-positive law title. The Federal statutes set out editorially in title 42 have been explicitly enacted, but title 42, per se, has not.

Provisions set out in non-positive law titles of the United States Code may vary slightly from the precise language enacted into law; cross references are adapted and stylistic changes are made in order to facilitate the integration of Federal statutory provisions into the United States Code. By contrast, a positive law title of the United States Code constitutes the precise statutory language enacted into law. [end of quote.] http://uscode.house.gov/codification/positive_law_codification.pdf HERE 

AGAIN and again, and again, until the perps can understand ...... 

[QUOTING . . . . ]

    "Alternatively, title 42, United States Code, "The Public Health and Welfare", is a non-positive law title. The Federal statutes set out editorially in title 42 have been explicitly enacted, but title 42, per se, has not." HERE [end of quote.]

JUDICIAL NOTICE

SO just another FACT of "specific evidence" that the EXAMPLE Title 42 U.S.C IS NOT "A NON-POSITIVE LAW TITLE!" . . . and "NOT EXPLICITLY ENACTED!"

.... When these "ACTORS ACT".... "under the color of law," pertaining to lawful judges, or lawful prosecutors or lawful "clerks of a lawful court" ARE NOT and CAN NEVER BE SUCH, in any sense of the DEFINITIONS thereof. AND without OUR "FULL KNOWLEDGEABLE CONSENT," it is a FEDERAL FELONY / FRAUD to pretended "jurisdiction," and or any "legal or lawful complicity," what-so-ever, NEVER!

BESIDES. . . .

[QUOTING . . . . ]

PENHALLOW v. DOANE'S ADMINISTRATORS (Supreme Court of the United States 1795) HERE quoted as follows. . .  
    "Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only, a government can interface only with other artificial persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them." [end of copied and pasted.]

That said, QUOTING in the yellow color ....

1. "Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person,". . . NOW. . . DID that BRAKE THE ICING ON THE FAKE COURT CAKE? And if any entity, or group of people, work for ANY "government" agency, City, County or State (sub-contracted to the FEDERAL) government, they ALL are in fact are "Artificial persons," ALSO . . .  

2.  "government can interface onlywith other artificial persons."                                       

ARE YOU AN "ARTIFICIAL PERSON?"  YES OR NO! 

    IF the answer is. . . . "NO" . . .  than the "THEY" have NO "subject matter jurisdiction," NOR ANY "PERSONAL JURISDICTION," NOR ANY "JUDICIAL STANDING," what so flipping EVER, over ANY of OUR, AFFAIRS, by "any of their" contrived CORPORATE NON-Positive LAWS, Statutes, Codes, Rules or REGULATIONS, and duh "they" are NOT even to communicate with you without YOUR PERMISSION.

   THEY also lied, committed FRAUD, pretending / ACTING that YOU ARE AN "ARTIFICIAL PERSON." Some, if NOT most, bar carders, were taught NOT TO READ, the actual words in a simple statement or question.

3. AND to be more CONCLUSIVE .... "The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible,"  JUDICIAL NOTICE: WE ARE THE "TANGIBLE," and NOT duh they, who are the "ARTIFICIAL PERSONS."

   THAT PERTAINS TO ANY, NON JUDICIAL, NON-JURY TRIAL, UN-CONSTITUTIONAL "artificial persons" Examples, just to name just FEW, such as....and ALL Family (pretended) Courts, and Municipal (pretended) Courts, Justice of the Peace (pretended) Courts, and ANY OTHER """NON TRIAL,"""" quasi governmental agents, and ANY AND ALL NON-COMMON LAW, "artificial persons," or "government" agencies."

4. AND..... "The legal manifestation of this is that NO government, as well as any law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them."  [end of quote.]

SINCE, only the "artificial, CORPORATE, ADMINISTRATIVE, government, artificial FRAUDULENT COURT'S, agents, can ONLY under a "legal manifestation of this is that NO government, as well as any law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them."  [end of quote.]

    SO .... DEMAND these "artificial" courts.....their evidence, of THE ABSOLUTE PROOF THAT "WE the Living People," are "Artificial PERSONS?"  WHERE IS YOUR PROOF? 

AND "IF" the "ACTORS" could READ. . . (be like a "heaven on earth," SITUATION.") But they can NOT read thru "GREED stained bar cards."

HALE v. HENKEL 201 U.S. 43 at 89 (1906) HERE [most viewers, will, and or, should re-read the following more than twice (2 TIMES), to re-place the "lies" that your, [and or their teachers,] may have lied to you, [and to them,] about . . . while you or they were "falsely" believing that they were "studying" LAW. . . .  ]

[QUOTING verbatim . . . ]

the opinion of the court states:

     "The "individual" may stand upon "his Constitutional Rights" as a CITIZEN. He is entitled to carry on his "private" business in his own way." His power to contract is unlimited." He owes no duty to the State or to his neighbors to divulge his business, or to open his doors to an investigation, so far as it may tend to incriminate him. He owes no duty to the State, since he receives nothing there from, beyond the protection of his life and property. "His rights" are such as "existed" by the Law of the Land (Common Law) "long antecedent" to the organization of the State", and can only be taken from him by "due process of law", and "in accordance with the Constitution." "He owes nothingto the public so long as he does not trespass upon their rights." [end of quote. And I should not have to use words like "Emphasis added," for anyone that actually has an IQ above their shoe size.]

THIS IS A "JUDICIAL WARNING" TO "ALL" COURT PERSONAL

Including "judges," prosecutors, clerks, ETC. ETC.

AND ANY AND ALL OTHER Quasi-NON-Positive Law GOVERNMENT AGENCIES,

Departments, State, City, County, Township, ETC ETC

FACTS as Evidence as follows . . .

Not ONLY the "case LAW" Rules, but ALSO the United States Codes shall be applied within the "States" as in 28 U.S.C. § 1652 - Judiciary and Judicial Procedure § 1652. State laws as rules of decision.

READ!

   "The laws of the several states, except where the Constitution or treaties of the United States or Acts of Congress otherwise require or provide, shall be regarded as rules of decision in civil actions in the courts of the United States, in cases where they apply." [Refer to * 28 U.S.C. § 3002 below.] [end of quote]            

That pertains DIRECTLY to any "court" anywhere IN THE UNITED STATES. Unless they provide an "AFFIDAVIT Under the Pains and Penalty, and under "Full Liability [not lie-ability,] signed by judges and clerk of court's own hands' and  quasi-court Seal affixed to their AFFIDAVIT, than

1. Silence Equals Consent by NOT responding to  "REQUEST / DEMAND for said Affidavit  or 2.  Also that becomes Evidence of their CORPORATE status, and will be used in one of THEIR CORPORATE Superior Quasi COURTS under an "Grand Jury INDICTMENT, and than with a "JURY TRIAL."

3. OR you are invited to the INTERNATIONAL COURT . . . PDF Handbook HERE 

   Impersonating ANY officer of the United States (Federal, and or State (any and ALL inferior courts,) is a federal felony violation of 18 U.S.C. 912.  

[QUOTING . . . . ]

    "Whoever falsely assumes or pretends to be an officer or employee acting under the authority of the United States or any department, agency or officer thereof, and acts as such, or in such pretended character demands or obtains any money, paper, document, or thing of value, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both." [end of quote.]

   Aiding and abetting such impersonation is a felony violation of 18 U.S.C. 3 .  as an "accessory after (before or during,) the fact." 

[QUOTING. . .]

   "Whoever, knowing that an offense against the United States has been committed, receives, relieves, comforts or assists the offender in order to hinder or prevent his apprehension, trial or punishment, is an accessory after the fact.

   Except as otherwise expressly provided by any Act of Congress, an accessory after the fact shall be imprisoned not more than one-half the maximum term of imprisonment or . . . fined not more than one-half the maximum fine prescribed for the punishment of the principal, or both;  or if the principal is punishable by life imprisonment or death, the accessory shall be imprisoned not more than 15 years." [end of quote.]

18 U.S.C. 4 When anyone tell anyone else, that a crime is being committed, and that "anyone else" is in ANY "law enforcement, judicial, or governmental compactly," and they do NOT DO ANYTHING TO STOP the criminals, or notify other "LEOs or JOs. "IMMEDIATELY: they become. . . the "WHOEVER" . . . .

[QUOTING . . . . ]

    Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. [end of quote.]

Falsifying or concealing a material fact that is within the jurisdiction of any branch of the Federal government, and is another felony violation of 18 U.S.C. 1001.  Includes "electronic" email, posting your name on the internet ETC. ETC.

[QUOTING . . . . ]

    Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the knowingly d willfully-- , (a) falsifies, fact; Government of the United States conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material

(1) makes any representation; materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or

(2)  or materially makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any  false,

(3) fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry; shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years."  [end of quote.]

   Transmitting false and/or fraudulent court "process," subpoenas, orders ETC., ETC., via U.S. Mail is mail fraud, another felony violation of 18 U.S.C. 1341

[QUOTING in part . . . ]

    Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations . . . for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice or attempting so to do, places in any post office or authorized depository for mail matter, any matter or thing whatever to be sent or delivered by the Postal Service, or deposits or causes to be deposited any matter or thing whatever to be sent or delivered by any private or commercial interstate carrier. . . shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both . . . "   [end of quote. that also includes, "Public Notices" in news papers, or uploaded, and or posted into the internet, which is covered by the words . . . "sent or delivered by any private or commercial interstate carrier. . ."]

    Moreover, "mail fraud," is also one of the RICO "predicate acts" itemized at 18 U.S.C. 1961 et seq.  See also 28 U.S.C. 1691 in this context.  (to name a few of the 10 more FEDERAL CRIMINAL STATUTES that RULE any and ALL COURT PERSONAL within the BORDERS of the United States.) 

AND:

[QUOTING . . . . ]

*** 28 U.S.C. § 3002 14 & 15A - Judiciary and Judicial Procedure § 3002. Definitions. . .

(14) " State " means any of the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas, or any territory or possession of the United States

(15) ' United States " means--

(A) a Federal corporation;

(B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States;  or

(C) an instrumentality of the United States. [end of quote.]

[SO let us allow LOGIC to RULE in using the "Definition" of "United States," with (A) a " Federal Corporation," by injecting the meaning, into (B) and (C) as follows. . . .]

(B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the "Federal corporation;" or

(C) an instrumentality of the Federal corporation."

[AND CLOSER LOGICAL LOOK WE READ. . .]

(14) " State " means . . . .[a] " possession of the United States [A Federal Corporation.]"

OR even better "14) " State " means . . . .[a] " possession of the Federal Corporation.

         SO, . . . FACT: 
There is NO REAL, DEJURE, (equals any TRUE, REAL, ACCRUAL,) "STATE and or FEDERAL " government" / COURTS, Agencies, Departments, 
of and by "We the People" of the 
united states of America. That includes ALL City, County as  Sub-Contractor's of United States. AND you do not have to believe that for it, for that to still be a FACT.

** NO ONE ONE! **

But YOU CAN FORCE THESE PERPS / Perpetrators / "ACTORS" INTO "THEIR" so-called HIGHER COURTS, 
to have "THEM" TRIED BY A JURY, as a "REMEDY," and at "TRIPLE DAMAGE VIA A "FEDERAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT."   

AND if the OTHER "ACTORS" / "PRETENDED" GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, COURTS, etc., etc., etc.,
 DO NOT ACT UPON SAID FED COMPLAINT, 
THEY "JOIN" INTO THE CONSPIRACY UNDER Title 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3 AND 4
HERE

 [QUOTING . . . . ]

AND BY HINDERING AN INVESTIGATION Title 18 Sec. 1582  HERE

        Whoever, with intent to avoid, evade, prevent, or obstruct compliance, in whole or in part, with any civil investigative demand duly and properly made under the Antitrust Civil Process Act, willfully withholds, misrepresents, removes from any place, conceals, covers up, destroys, mutilates, alters, or by other means falsifies any documentary material, answers to written interrogatories, or oral testimony, which is the subject of such demand;  or attempts to do so or solicits another to do so;  or

  Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or. . .

Shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years . . ." [end of quote.]

[QUOTING . . . . ]

Title 18 Sec 1506 Theft or alteration of record or process; HERE

Whoever feloniously steals, takes away, alters, falsifies, or otherwise avoids any record, writ, process, or other proceeding, in any court of the United States, whereby any judgment is reversed, made void, or does not take effect;

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. [end of quote.]

 [QUOTING . . . . And here is a GREAT AFFIRMATION for "It is so ORDERED" issued by the United States Supreme Court, as in THEIR "IT IS SO ORDERED" challenge. ]

18 U.S.C. § 1509 - Obstruction of court orders HERE

Whoever, by threats or force, willfully prevents, obstructs, impedes, or interferes with, or willfully attempts to prevent, obstruct, impede, or interfere with, the due exercise of rights or the performance of duties under any order, judgment, or decree of a court of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

No injunctive or other civil relief against the conduct made criminal by this section shall be denied on the ground that such conduct is a crime.

[end of quote.Copied and pasted....]

WARNING:

 This is an actual NOTICE that anyone (which can include you,) who READS THIS NOTICE is being duly NOTIFIED as the "WHO-EVERS" MENTIONED ABOVE U.S.C. which includes, but not limited to,) PO "Police Officers, LEOs (Law Enforcement Officers, JOs (Judicial Officers, including prosecutors, clerks etc. etc) OF THAT FACT IN A WARNING AT THE BEGINNING OF THE COMPLAINT RIGHT AFTER THE HEADING.

____________________________________


NOW FOR THE LINKS!

NOTICE:

ANY OR ALL OF THE LINKED SITES, on this site, may (or may,) NOT Agree, with any "subject matter," on this site. AND ..... 

SO With that FACT in Mind..... "NONE of the LINKED SITES ARE LIABLE FOR ANYTHING ON THIS SITE."

 

AND. . . We are "NOT" RESPONSIBLE for any "DEAD" Links! 

BUT YOU can kindly, Let Us Know, and when we get time, 

we will attempt to fix, or what needs to be to updated in any "dead" links. THANKS!

____________________________________________

 

OUR Newest Youtube Vid about this site.  HERE 

THE SUPREME LAW LIBRARY  HERE

FAMILY Guardian  HERE

Freedom-School.com/law HERE

TheConstitution.org HERE

  Bouvier's LAW DICTIONARY HERE

Black's Law Dictionary - Free Online HERE

FACT: 

ALL Municipal, and all JP / Constable courts are in "TOTAL LACK of LAWFUL Jurisdiction" to issue "search warrants and or arrest" warrants, that upon conviction could end in ANY "Jail Time" what so ever. LAW-FULLY . . .

FAC: They are ALL ONLY  "Class C Misdemeanors , 

1. FINE ONLY,  PDF HERE  Quoting verbatim . . . "They also have jurisdiction in misdemeanor cases where punishment upon
conviction may be by fine only.  [end of quote.]         

2. NO "jail,"

3. NO "Confinement,"  SEE above PDF, refer to the IMAGE on Municipal Court QUOTING . . 

"Criminal misdemeanors punishable by fine only (no confinement)" [end of quote,]

And to a normal minded "living being" that is NOT trying to "READ thru a "bar card," . . . the words . . .

"Criminal misdemeanors punishable by fine only (no confinement)" means NO ARREST, NO JAIL TIME, NO DETAINMENT PEROID!

and REMEMBER that means they can NOT ARREST ANYONE and must bump the case / ACTION to the county level where a

"JURY TRIAL" is available, for a "JURY TRIAL."  


AT Youtube™ (until they take it down again.)

 Municipal Court have NO Jurisdiction 1  HERE

OR

Municipal Court have NO Jurisdiction 2  HERE

 

_________________________________________


HELP US HELP OTHERS 

by DONATING

 Tap the PIC BELOW.

Buy me a coffee!

 THAT Excellent DONATION SERVICE IS:

BuyMeCoffee.com HERE

 

SECURE: CONTACT US  HERE

_____________________________

 

TO "HELP" PROMOTE and GROW THIS SITE FOR FREE

THE FOLLOWING SITES are "SUBMIT SITES" 

SO "ADD YOUR SITE" from the "CLICK ON the TEXT LINKS!" 

 

Active Search Rresults


EXACTSEEK

 

 FREE WEB MONITORING

 

MORE TO COME INCLUDING DOCS / PDFs

  

_________________________________________________________

 

AGAIN....

NOTICE: ON ALL EXTERNAL LINKS . . . .

"ANY "LINKED" SITES, above may or may NOT agree with SOME, or ALL

of the "Subject Matter" contained herein, and are only provided as EDUCATIONAL

REFERENCE MATERIAL, FOR "RESEARCH," and totally HERE under the "FARE USE LAW," ONLY!!

 

 __________________________________________

 

** THIS IS THE DISCLAIMER at the END of the Page:

SO YOU DON'T WASTE "OUR" TIME. . .

WE ARE NOT LEGALLY, nor MORALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANYTHING YOU DO,

AND, OR DO NOT DO, 

IF YOU DO IT INCORRECTLY, OR

YOU DO IT WITH THE WRONG ATTITUDE.  

[The "attitude" part is about if you "believe" in what you are using, or not, or if it works or does not work.]

FACT 1: 

If YOU DO NOT "REALLY" BELIEVE IN WHAT YOU ARE USING WILL WORK, 

OR EVEN .....

"IT WILL WORK," equals "The WORKING ATTITUDE"

BUT. . .

IF YOUR ATTITUDE / Belief is....  "it maybe should work,"

OR  . . .  "has it worked before?"

OR  "How do you know if it works NOW?"

than

THAT IS YOUR FAULT,

and REALLY has NOTHING TO DO WITH THE MATERIAL, NOR the Process. 

 

FACT 2.

BE-LIVE IT OR NOT..... 

IF YOU DO NOT BELIEVE SOMETHING WILL WORK.... 
MORE THAN LIKELY, IT WILL NOT WORK!

SO . . . YOU SHOULD DO THE "ATTITUDE Adjustments" BEFORE YOU 

1.  BEGIN any "process" filings before you file, and

BEFORE .... 

2. YOU START THROWING BLAME, on any "others!"

THANKS!

(^ Back to the TOP ^)