POSITIVE LAW

ONLY A "POSITIVE," Enacted, and Codified Code IS LAW!

SO HERE IS WHERE YOU CAN FIND THE TRUTH!

HERE is a "REBUTTAL" to any and ALL NON-POSITIVE Codes being "LAW."


AND IF.... there are RE-QUOTES from our "homepage" is a GOOD thing that some or most of us need to STUDY them again. 

HERE WE GO. . .

[COPIED "IN PART," Under "Fair Use" Educational, and PASTED from: https://www.govinfo.gov/help/uscode]

The United States Code, is the codification by subject matter of the general and permanent laws of the United States. It is divided by broad subjects into 53 titles and published by the Office of the Law Revision Counsel of the U.S. House of Representatives. . . . [end of copied PARTS.]

[more copied PARTS. . . ]

      ". . . .Of the 54 titles, the following titles have been enacted into positive (statutory) law : 1, 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 17, 18, 23, 28, 31, 32, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 44, 46, 49, 51, and 54. When a title of the Code was enacted into positive law, the text of the title became legal evidence of the law. Titles that have not been enacted into positive law are only prima facie evidence of the law. . .  [end of the "in part" copied and pasted educational QUOTE.]

 

NON - ENACTED, NOR CODIFIED and NOT "POSITIVE LAW," are Titles are 2, 6, 7, 8, 12, 15, 16, 19, 20, 21, 22, 24, 25, 26, 27, 29, 30, 34, 42, 43, 45, 47, 48, 53

SO IF YOU CAN SEE, and understand WHAT YOU SEE... Title 42 U.S.C has NOT been. . .
1. "ENACTED"  NOR

2. NOR "CODIFIED" NOR

3. Made "POSITIVE LAW."

OR RE-VIEW of the last COPIED Educational INFORMATION:

1. "the following titles have been enacted into positive (statutory) law"

2. "When a title of the Code was enacted into positive law, the text of the title became legal evidence of the law."

3. "Titles that have not been enacted into positive law are only prima facie evidence of the law. . ."

 

[COPIED "IN PART," Under "Fair Use" Educational, and PASTED from:

https://thelawdictionary.org/prima-facie/

A prima facie case, then, is one which is established by sufficient evidence, and can be overthrown only by rebutting evidence adduced on the other side.


 AND. . .Under "Fair Use" Educational, and PASTED from:

https://thelawdictionary.org/codification/

Definition of CODIFICATION: The process of collecting and arranging the laws of a country or state into a code, t. e., into a complete system of positive law, scientifically ordered, The Law Dictionary Featuring Black's Law Dictionary Free Online Legal Dictionary 2nd Ed.


[COPIED "IN PART," Under "Fair Use" Educational, and PASTED from:

Codification (law)From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is about the tradition of publishing the laws of a state or society as official documents or books. For other uses, see Codification (disambiguation).

In law, codification is the process of collecting and restating the law of a jurisdiction in certain areas, usually by subject, forming a legal code, i.e. a codex (book) of law."

 

Codification is one of the defining features of civil law jurisdictions.[contradictory] In common law systems, such as that of English law, codification is the process of converting and consolidating judge-made law into statute law.

 

[COPIED "IN PART," Under "Fair Use" Educational, and PASTED from:

positive_law_codification PDF there > https://uscode.house.gov/codification/positive_law_codification.pdf

Office of the Law Revision Counsel

Positive law titles

The United States Code is divided into subject matter titles. Some are "positive law" titles and some are "non-positive law" titles. The difference is this:

 

A positive law title of the United States Code is - itself - a Federal statute

 

A non-positive law title of the United States Code is an editorial compilation of Federal statutes.

SO "Positive LAW"  ARE FEDERAL STATUTES and

NON-Positive CODES are NOT "FEDERAL STATUTES

Title 42 U.S.C. is NOT "POSITIVE LAW," and it is JUST . . . "an editorial compilation of [the] Federal statutes.

NOW. . .   

WHO IS the OLRC

Office of the Law Revision Counsel of the United States House of Representatives.

https://uscode.house.gov/browse.xhtml;jsessionid=CA4FD516E9DC82D586448F075683381B

POSITIVE LAW CODIFICATION

 

Positive law codification by the Office of the Law Revision Counsel is the process of preparing and enacting a codification bill to restate existing law as a positive law title of the United States Code. The restatement conforms to the policy, intent, and purpose of Congress in the original enactments, but the organizational structure of the law is improved, obsolete provisions are eliminated, ambiguous provisions are clarified, inconsistent provisions are resolved, and technical errors are corrected.

 

[COPIED "IN PART," Under "Fair Use" Educational, and PASTED from:

https://uscode.house.gov/codification/legislation.shtml [see the .gov.]

Positive Law Titles vs. Non-Positive Law Titles

The Code is divided into titles according to subject matter. Some are called positive law titles and the rest are called non-positive law titles.


A positive law title of the Code is itself a Federal statute. A non-positive law title of the Code is an editorial compilation of Federal statutes. For example, Title 10, Armed Forces, is a positive law title because the title itself has been enacted by Congress. For the enacting provision of Title 10, see first section of the Act of August 10, 1956, ch. 1041 (70A Stat. 1). By contrast, Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, is a non-positive law title. Title 42 is comprised of many individually enacted Federal statutes––such as the Public Health Service Act and the Social Security Act––that have been editorially compiled and organized into the title, but the title itself has not been enacted.

YES AGAIN. . . "A positive law title of the Code is itself a Federal statute."
WHICH conversely means that a NON-Positive Code is NOT "a Federal statute!"

 

[COPIED "IN PART," Under "Fair Use" Educational, and PASTED from:

https://uscode.house.gov/codification/legislation.shtml

The distinction is legally significant. Non-positive law titles are prima facie evidence of the law, but positive law titles constitute legal evidence of the law in all Federal and State courts.

 

AGAIN....THIS IS A REBUTTAL "Without needing to going to the Statutes at Large," 

JUST BY USING COMMON SENSE and OTHER  SITES which STATE FACTS that  A  NON-Positive  CODE IS NOT A "LAW" in any "sense" of the word "LAW!" IF IT, a Code, is NOT Positive LAW it must be... NEGATIVE law, or in reality NOT A LAW.

Quoted, in PART, "Fair Use, Educational, copied and pasted from:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_court#cite_note-2

In the United States family court falls under the heading of Trial Courts of Limited Jurisdiction. These types of courts deal only with a specific type of case and they are usually presided over by a single judge without a jury.

[2] "Federal Court Basics". uscourts.gov. 2013. Retrieved 31 July 2013.

 

YES that said.... "In the United States family court falls under the heading of Trial Courts. . ."  So with that FACT they are SUPPOSED to be "TRIAL Courts," since they are UNDER that "HEADING." THAN it states. . . "they are usually presided over by a single judge without a jury?" HUH?

 

IF they were, or should be.... under the "Heading of Dog Catcher Courts," they would be having "Doggy Court! Logic has it: IF they are UNDER "Heading" of "TRIAL COURTS" than they should be TRIAL ONLY COURTS. SAVVY?

 

FACT: Since they are NOT Established by any "POSITIVE LAW," NOR "Codified," NOR "Enacted" by the US Congress, than they are NOT IN FACT "COURTS," of LAW"

FACT: NO LAW, NO COURT! Now that is "LIMITED Jurisdiction!"

 

AND SINCE they are . . . "of Limited Jurisdiction."

THAT IS VERY "LIMITED" as in REAL NO "JURISDICTION," as they have NO  "POSITIVE LAW,' . . .NOR "Codified LAW, . . . NOR "ENACTED" by the CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES. NOW THAT IS TOTALLY "LIMITED" "jurisdiction," to state the LEAST! 

 

NOW, Since the "NON State Licensed," but rather, Private Association of the "bar carded," most have been wrongly taught, that the "BILL OF RIGHTS" does not cover a "State Court," as in "7th. Amendment  "TRIAL BY JURY"..... so "some of them" can fantasize themselves as being "judges" in their own NON-LAW-FUL quasi-courts.  So some of the "They" can make BILLIONS in their illegal profession, via their own "ILLEGAL FALLACY."              That "LIE" seems to be pre-VEILING fallacy by some of the "banisters."

    

    SO Let's prove that to be another "bar carded" FALLACY," as in a LIE!

WE could go PAST that ole "LAW of the LAND," which not only INCLUDES, the "BILL OF RIGHTS," but also the 7TH. Amendment, which "GUARANTEES" a "Trial by Jury" for ANY AMOUNT ($$) "in controversy," ABOVE $20 (USD), which has NEVER BEEN CHANGED, NOR "REPEALED, by anyone."

 

AND... LET the REST OF US,  as in EACH AND EVERYONE OF US. . .  

GO TO OUR OWN STATES CONSTITUTION, and STUDY... AND....

for this Legal EXAMPLE of a "TRIAL BY JURY" we see in Texas Constitution....

NOTE: since this SITE is a DIY (Do It Yourself,) assistance site, be my guest, and "YOU" can go and LOOK UP YOUR OWN STATE!

 

[Copied in Part and Pasted from:

https://tlc.texas.gov/docs/legref/TxConst.pdf 

     Sec. 15. RIGHT OF TRIAL BY JURY. The right of trial by jury shall remain

inviolate. The Legislature shall pass such laws as may be needed to regulate the same, and to maintain its purity and efficiency. . . " (Amended Aug. 24, 1935.) 

 

[QUOTED ... in PART, from. . .

https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/inviolate]

inviolate: adjective complete, consecrated, free from desecration, free from impairment, hallowed, intact, integer, inviolatus, pure, sacred, sanctified, secure, sound, spotless, stainless, unaffected by injury, unaltered, unblemished, unbroken, uncorrupted, undestroyed, undisturbed, unharmed, unhurt, unimpaired, uninjured, unpolluted, unprofaned, unscathed, unspotted, unstained, untouched, whole

 

IN Simple TERMS... NOT TO BE CESSED: STOPPED, or IMPAIRED, meaning NO "court, (equals NONE,) NO judge, NO Law enforcement agent, NO LAW, OR ANYONE, OR THING CAN PUT "TRIAL BY JURY" ASIDE, and the State of Texas can ONLY ".... and to maintain its purity and efficiency. . . " of the UNSTOPPABLE LAW of a "TRIAL BY JURY!" SAVVY YET!

 

And a SIDE FACT: the PEOPLE in the State of Texas also have this LAW,

   [QUOTING. . .]

Sec. 29. BILL OF RIGHTS EXCEPTED FROM POWERS OF GOVERNMENT AND INVIOLATE. To guard against transgressions of the high powers herein delegated, we declare that everything in this "Bill of Rights" is excepted out of the general powers of government, and shall forever remain inviolate, and all laws contrary thereto, or to the following provisions, shall be void.

 

QUOTING AGAIN, in case, anyone is STILL Trying to see thru a "bar card," the REST OF US SEE the GUARANTEE which states. . . .

    ". . . this "Bill of Rights" is excepted out of the general powers of government, and shall forever remain inviolate, and all laws contrary thereto, or to the following provisions, shall be void."

 

    AND since the so-called "family," so-called "courts" (pretend to be courts, without a "JURY TRIAL"),.... then any and ALL "ORDERS," and any and all "Judgments," and any and ALL "VERDICTS ARE VOID," (V-O-I-D) WITHOUT A "TRIAL BY JURY," because NO "LAW" can contrary thereto, and SHALL BE VOID." which INCLUDES, any pretended LAW.. including any Codes, any Statutes, any City or any County "Ordnances," equals. . . YOU_ALL_ARE_VOID of any JURISDICTION without a "TRIAL BY JURY."

 

___________________________________



HELP US HELP OTHERS 

by DONATING

 Tap the PIC BELOW.

Buy me a coffee!

 THAT IS AN Excellent DONATION SERVICE  SIGN UP AT . . .

BuyMeCoffee.com HERE

 SECURE: CONTACT US  HERE

_____________________________________



HOME PAGE

 BACK HOME!